|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Bull Goose Loony
|
![]()
My friend swears it's the wave of the future for the movie industry, whereas I think it's just faddish, and I really don't like it in the first place.
If they continue doing 3-D, half the films are going to be shot with the characters facing directly into the camera...lame... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Have My Own Room
|
![]()
The problem is that they are able to charge more for the tickets at the theatres, and it is incentive to increase theatre attendance. DVDs took a huge chunk out of their attendance numbers over the last dozen years. 3D is putting butts back in seats like nothing else they've done has. Similar change to how color affected the movies, IMO. It's not a fad, and it's not going away. quality will improve as more movies are shot in it, as Avatar was, instead of converted as Alice was. Like any other business, they follow the money. More profits on 3D movies = more 3D movies.
__________________
Formerly Malik23 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Dayman, Master of Karate
|
![]()
Well the main problem is that most of these movies aren't actually shot as 3d films. They're being retrofitted in post production. Avatar was intended to be a 3d movie and was shot with new 3d cameras. Clash of the Titans, Alice in Wonderland, etc--they're shot like any other film. Then someone on a computer forces them to be 3d.
But bottom line; yes, it's completely overdone. It has never once made a movie better for me. 2001: A Space Odyssey was made in 2d (in the sixties), still looks phenomenal, and is better than almost everything out coming out nowadays.
__________________
In the merry month of June, from me home I started... |
![]() |
![]() |