|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Traveler
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EMPEROR TOMPKINS
![]() |
![]()
I for one love 3D if it's made correctly, best 3D I have ever seen was COMING AT YA, anyone ever heard of it? The movie itself sucks balls, but the 3D in is amazing and entire movie every 5 seconds something is COMING AT YA.
I feel 3D is being run into the ground and they are now ruining it. Do we really need 3D tv's so our favorite sports players can jump out at us??? I don't need an ugly ass Shaq in my house *Shudder* And now cable is jumping on the bandwagon and now offering 3D.....it's run it's course....as one person said it was cool in the 50's now it's just a gimmick. Again, if it's done right like the film I mentioned above then by all means make it in 3D, but I don't want to see Twilight in 3D or anything like that, where only the fight sequences are in 3D. There, just my ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
The Belly of the Beast
|
![]()
I actually picked up a 3D tv, not because I wanted a 3D tv, but because I got a great price on it, and due to the nature of 3D the processor in this TV is insane. I suppose I could have just purchased a high end TV with a 240 MHZ processor, but I figured for the novelty and a few extra bucks (less than 100) for a 3D setup, it was worth it.
I've watched a few baseball games with the 3D feature turned on, and its ok, adds depth back into the TV, not projecting out at you, but the few movies that I've watched have been really cool, Monsters VS. Aliens specifically.
__________________
Lover of the One and Only, New Castle Brown Ale |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Will herf for food
|
![]() Quote:
BTW, the 120/240 Hz rating on TVs is not the processor speed. It is the refresh rate. It is a measurement of the number of times per second (Hz, not MHz which would be millions of times per second) the screan is redrawn/refreshed. The higher the number the less blurring you'll see when watching action movies or other fast motion. That said, the human eye has a very hard time detecting refresh rates over about 85 Hz. I have somewhat of a sensitive eye and I can tell see flicker visible due to low refresh rates (especially old CRTs) at rates up to 75 Hz. Once they hit 85 Hz, I can't see the flicker anymore and the screen appears static or solid. Low refresh rates common to CRTs and low end LCD TVs usually start at 60 Hz. While you may not have a senstive eye that can see the flicker it will still cause eye strain. Again CRTs are much worse than any LCD, but still I would recommend the 120 Hz models. 240 Hz in my opinon is overkill. If you're eye can't detect it, why pay extra for it?
__________________
“Eating and sleeping are the only activities that should be allowed to interrupt a man's enjoyment of his cigar;” Mark Twain |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Grrrrrr
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Laser Disc wasn't really a fad. For being such an expensive early technology it had quite a long run, over 20 years. Ultimately, why it died was the cost and the convenience of newer technology had outpaced it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
MIND OVER MATTER...
Join Date: Feb 2011
First Name: RICO
Location: So. CAL 33° 44' 44" N / 117° 52' 0" W
Posts: 2,330
Trading: (1)
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
3-D is like all the reality shows it's make money right now but everyone gets all fed-up with it it will go the way of the Dodo bird...
![]()
__________________
When I want your opinion, I'll give it to ya. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |