|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Gramps 4x's
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Horatio Seymore Hiny
Location: Boca Raton - North of La Habana
Posts: 8,774
Trading: (8)
![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Why were you surcharged for a rear end where you were the one rear ended? That is not a loss qualifying for a surcharge. Are you sure your increase was not attributed to a non related regular rate increase? If it was due to an accident surcharge, I would contact your carrier and demand a reduction and credit. If they don't comply, file a complaint with your local state insurance department.
__________________
Little known fact: I am a former member of the Village People - The Indian |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Jordan #2
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Gramps 4x's
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Horatio Seymore Hiny
Location: Boca Raton - North of La Habana
Posts: 8,774
Trading: (8)
![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
This is not uncommon. What happens is the new carrier sees a record of an accident. Based on that, they assume it is one they can surcharge. If you contact your prior carrier that you had at the time, they are obligated to provide you with a letter stating outcome of that accident. If you didn't go through your own carrier and you went through that of the party that rear ended you, same thing. They have to provide you a letter indicating you were not at fault. When you get that letter, your carrier will be obligated to reimburse you the surcharge amount. While I work for an insurance company and am often explaining our actions that most don't understand, if I were you, I would invest the minimal time involved in getting this letter and get your money back. Better in your pocket than in theirs.
__________________
Little known fact: I am a former member of the Village People - The Indian |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Jordan #2
|
![]() Quote:
75$ is 75$. |
|
![]() |
![]() |