|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Instead of choosing one and eliminating one choice completely, I would look at specific TVs from a spec, price, and quality standpoint and then go from there.
Or just buy a pioneer elite. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Haberdasher
|
Plasma by far. Burn ins were a thing of the past. New sets also have extended lives of up to 100,000 hours. If you're hitting the slope, go with something you won't regret. Start with 50". Panasonic makes a damn nice 50" and can be had for <$1300 if you search around. I have a Panny 42" that's 4 years old and it still wows me. LCDs are getting better, especially the 120 Hz models. I like the warm plasma look though. Nothing smaller than 1920x1080.
__________________
Somebody has to go back and get a chitload of dimes |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
difetosso
|
Quote:
__________________
I'm an outcast riding into town alone I got wanderlust branded deeper than the bone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Still Watching My Back
|
I went with plasma when I took the plunge early this year. And I went with a Panasonic 42" 1080p. The screen has an anti-reflective coating so bright room glare is minimized too. Plasma has a wider viewing angle than LCD, which was another of my requirements. The set I got really fits my needs and wows me too, even though conventional wisdom says a 42" is too small to show the full glory of 1080p.
__________________
"I know God won't give me anything I can't handle. I just wish He didn't trust me so much." |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
puta por Ninfas!
|
Plasma, no doubt.
The best LCD's have about a 50,000-to-1 dynamic contrast ratio; plasma has 1,000,000-to-1. Meaning you'll get a better picture, higher contrast and truer blacks with plasma.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Adjusting to the Life
|
Another piece of advice. Like a humi, go bigger than you think. In order to really appreciate 1080p, you need to be closer than with a CRT. The larger the TV, the further away you can sit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|