|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Jordan #2
|
![]() Quote:
![]() They're very large cameras. The XTi or XSi offers a compact DSLR that will take nearly the same photos. Only thing it will lack is some of the focusing perks or advanced options... etc. Obviously the 40D is a better package overall, but I hope my intent is clear on this ![]() In the end the lenses will make more of a difference than the body ever will. And ultimately above all that, the user ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
difetosso
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
I'm an outcast riding into town alone I got wanderlust branded deeper than the bone |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Jordan #2
|
![]()
yea yea yea
![]() Personally, I consider NEEDing good lenses. A body is a body as long as it works well enough for your skill level. I'd advise investing that extra 200-300$ into a used 70-200 f/4L or something like a 17-85IS for a nice intermediate jump over the kit lens. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Feeling at Home
|
![]()
Absolutely, I agree on the lenses. However, I believe it all depends on the application as well. If you are just going to use it as an advanced P&S, then the kit lenses will meet your needs. However, if you are going to do portraits, macro, landscapes, or sports, definately save your loose change in a big jar and invest in good glass...the rewards are more than worth the $ outlay.
A must have is a nifty 50mm F1.4 or even the less expensive 1.8 for low light and indoor shots. |
![]() |
![]() |