More Questions :) What is Cellaring

Originally Posted by Curly Cut

correct. if you buy them in a TIN, do NOT open them (if your intent is to age them).
if you find a blend you like that's sold in bulk (cheaper/larger amounts), then you can seal them in large mason jars.

my tins are on my closet shelf... not on display, etc. there are some ppl around here with hundreds of tins, and probably 20+ lbs of bulk sealed in jars. so, having all that on top of your humidor would be difficult to pull off.

Ok so ready for the famous last words

I will not have that much tobacco.

[BigFrank]

Originally Posted by SilverFox

So if you are aging tobacco should you then not open it?
As in lets say I bought a pound and had a smaller smoking jar 1 oz or some similar and it was to get empty is there anything wrong with opening it and refilling or does opening effect the aging process adversely

What I meant was I buy a pound of tobacco, and take over half of it (10-12oz) and put it in a large jar for long term cellaring. I then take the remaining 4-6oz and split that tobacco up in smaller mason jars, usually 1oz or more, so that I can open a jar periodically and not spoil the larger mason jar.

Originally Posted by SilverFox

Ok so ready for the famous last words

I will not have that much tobacco.

You will. Best thing I did was buy a nice large rubber maid container and I just place everything in there and keep it in my closet. But now I have two, one for tins and one for jars...

Wal-Mart or Target sells a glass jar with a rubber seal at the top. I find these are nice for keeping tobacco. They also look nice. I usually open a tin and store it in a jar. These are kept on my desk. rX has a ton of them, check some of his pictures of his stash.

[DrDubzz]

Originally Posted by BigFrank

Wal-Mart or Target sells a glass jar with a rubber seal at the top. I find these are nice for keeping tobacco. They also look nice. I usually open a tin and store it in a jar. These are kept on my desk. rX has a ton of them, check some of his pictures of his stash.

Ema (Emma?) Jars. Very nice for tobacco you are going to be smoking regularly, pretty cheap too

[Mister Moo]

Rule of thumb about aging sealed tobaccos -

1. english blends tend not to show great improvement over time
2. most burley blends aren't known for their development over time
3. virginia tobaccos tend to improve over time

[RevSmoke]

Originally Posted by Mister Moo

Rule of thumb about aging sealed tobaccos -

1. english blends tend not to show great improvement over time
2. most burley blends aren't known for their development over time
3. virginia tobaccos tend to improve over time

This is most certainly true, but I'd add a little something

Virginias and Va/Pers age very well, and may even change drastically.

That means also that any blends containing a good amount of virginia have a good possibility of aging well - including English and/or Oriental blends.

If you want to cellar for aging purposes, whatever you sit aside - whether sealed tins or bulk in mason jars - leave alone and do not open.

If you are cellaring just to keep a little tobacco on hand (what I do) and buying by the pound (it is cheaper that way), get some smaller mason jars. I like 1/2 pint jars, and a pound will usually garner four 1/2 pint jars. Unintentional aging.

The nice thing about using mason jars, you can open them occasionally to draw tobacco out and it will remain fresh. The seal on the lids is usually very good.

[Bruce]

I would have to disagree about English blends not ageing well.
I have tins of John Cotton's, Sullivan's, Dunhill's, and Sobranie that are simply marvelous after 20/30/40 years in the tin.
As a matter of fact, I will only smoke tobaccos that have been aged for at least 5 to 10 years.

[Curly Cut]

Originally Posted by Bruce

I would have to disagree about English blends not ageing well.
I have tins of John Cotton's, Sullivan's, Dunhill's, and Sobranie that are simply marvelous after 20/30/40 years in the tin.

i have to agree with bruce and have sampled some of the tobacco from his cellar he mentions.

it's not that latakia based blends don't age well, it's just that the amount of time needed for them to improve is so much longer than it is for a VA - most don't want to wait that long or don't want to pay the premium for vintage sealed tins.

in my own experiences, the aged latakia blends are far, far, far superior to their fresher/younger versions. so much so that you would think you're not even smoking the same blend. i've had some that i doubted had a lick of latakia in them, that's how much they aged/improved. to me, it's a large improvement if i can't tell it has latakia, cuz i have found out i really don't like latakia.

so, it's not that they don't age/improve, it's just that to taste it, you have to age them for a while longer than a VA or VA/Per. where a VA can improve/mellow out/smooth the edges after 5 yrs or so, i haven't been able to tell a difference in 5 yr old heavy English or Oriental blends.

at least, that's what i've personally experienced.

[Mister Moo]

Originally Posted by Bruce

I would have to disagree about English blends not ageing well.
I have tins of John Cotton's, Sullivan's, Dunhill's, and Sobranie that are simply marvelous after 20/30/40 years in the tin.
As a matter of fact, I will only smoke tobaccos that have been aged for at least 5 to 10 years.

I cannot disagree with your disagreement but I did say english blends "tend" not to show great improvement, not that they do never improve. (I've enjoyed Sobranie and some Barry Levin stuff that was spectacular after 10-20 years in the can I've seem more latakia appear to hold, or lose, ground in my short viewing span of five-eight years.) This would be something interesting to discuss in depth in a new thread, if you would. -moo