|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Chutney Lovebusciut
Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Chutney
Location: On the shores of Loch Shiel
Posts: 4,291
Trading: (67)
![]() |
Quote:
![]()
__________________
That's when I got it. - Tristan (Shack XX) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Still Watching My Back
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Herf Crew of 2
Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Kevin
Location: The birthplace of Fathers Day
Posts: 2,465
Trading: (41)
![]() ![]() |
When using the word "strong" do you think the article is equating strong to taste or to nicotine strength. I like strong "tasting" cigars while I don't care for cigars High in nicotine content. Hell, if I want a lot of nicotine I'll go back to chain smokin cigs!
__________________
Founding member of the Lilac City Dedicated Herfers |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I agree, this and the Partagas Black. I've smoked 3 of the 5 and I didn't know those were suppose to be strong. I'd rather smoke any of those 5 before smoking another Partagas Black, even though it's been a few years those always made me dizzy. The CAIN was strong but didn't make me dizzy might smoke another one of those.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm with you on that Eric!
And I would have included the T110 too! I guess I'm just missing it with the Partagas Black, I "never" thought it was anything more than "maybe" a medium bodied cigar! ....and lastly, I'm sure everyone noticed that list was done in February 2008, damn near two years ago now. |
|