|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/showthread.php?t=19160 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Feeling at Home
|
![]() Quote:
He made a fresh batch. Get 'em if you want 'em. http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/showthread.php?t=25949 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
From what I've seen so far, Scott's beads need no maintainance, whereas the HF beads do. I have Scott's beads as the primary humidifying source in my vino's and the HF beads to recycle any drippings from condensation. I use HF in my cooler. I don't think there is anything out there that can duplicate Shilala beads. Silica is a different story though. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |