|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Dad Jokester Supreme
|
![]()
Nice shots!
Back in my photog days, I use to really enjoy long exposure night shots. It wasa always thrilling to see what actually showed up on the film. Of course, that was back in the day when we used film, not digital stuff.
__________________
...So don't sit upon the shoreline and say you're satisfied, Choose to chance the rapids and dare to dance that tide |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
I Need My Space
|
![]()
You want more you got more! Two more of my better shots.... They can be seen in my gallery as well.
The Great Cluster in Hercules - M13 ![]() The Dumbell Nebula ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
God Like Status
|
![]()
Always been fascinated with space photography! Thanks so much for sharing. Questions - you stated that you have several exposures. What determines your exposure times and the amount of? Also is there a correction in the scope between exposures - or is the distance between points A and B so great that none are required.
Ron |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
I Need My Space
|
![]() Quote:
As for correction, the scope itself tracks the object with its built in motor. This tracking is good enough for visual observing or short exposure photo's, but not for long exposure photography. For long exposures, I use another telescope mounted on my primary scope. This scope has a second camera which locks onto a star and sends corrections to the mount as the scope moves. Only five years ago, this process was completely manual meaning you had to watch the same star through your telescope while making the corrections yourself. I've said it a few times already, but the technology is amazing. |
|
![]() |
![]() |