Large RG not for me anymore

kenstogie · 08-11-2009, 01:13 PM

If I have the time the Big stuff is good. But generally I like a corona. Depends on the stick of course.

Noodles · 08-11-2009, 01:21 PM

I have always preferred Corona, PC and Lonsdale sizes. Recently, I've been digging larger cigars such as Robusto, CG, Torps, Churchill, DC. Who knows what I will like a year from now.

akumushi · 08-11-2009, 01:33 PM

I'm on a cigar allowance from the wife (2 a week) so I feel ripped off if I only get a 45 minute smoke, so I tend to stick with the larger vitolas to maximize my smoking time. I have recently fallen in love with the lonsdale size though, and have been meaning to try more lanceros. Thin or thick doesn't matter so much as the length to me because of smoking time. I have to say anything more than a 52 rg is excessive.

08-11-2009, 01:13 PM	#1
kenstogie following the whiterabbit Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Albany, NY Posts: 1,325 Trading: (3)	Re: Large RG not for me anymore If I have the time the Big stuff is good. But generally I like a corona. Depends on the stick of course.

08-11-2009, 01:21 PM	#2
Noodles Adjusting to the Life Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 412 Trading: (2)	Re: Large RG not for me anymore I have always preferred Corona, PC and Lonsdale sizes. Recently, I've been digging larger cigars such as Robusto, CG, Torps, Churchill, DC. Who knows what I will like a year from now.

08-11-2009, 01:33 PM	#3
akumushi Habanos Apologist Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 1,298 Trading: (11)	Re: Large RG not for me anymore I'm on a cigar allowance from the wife (2 a week) so I feel ripped off if I only get a 45 minute smoke, so I tend to stick with the larger vitolas to maximize my smoking time. I have recently fallen in love with the lonsdale size though, and have been meaning to try more lanceros. Thin or thick doesn't matter so much as the length to me because of smoking time. I have to say anything more than a 52 rg is excessive.