 |
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should Pete Rose be in the Hall of Fame? | |||
| Rose should be in the Hall. |
   
|
62 | 65.26% |
| Rose should not be in the Hall. |
  
|
20 | 21.05% |
| Depends (discuss below). |
  
|
7 | 7.37% |
| I could care less. |
  
|
6 | 6.32% |
| Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-28-2009, 12:19 PM
|
#11 | |
|
Knowhutimean, Vern?
Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Andy
Location: In a little town somewhere in the USA
Posts: 10,237
Trading: (4)
  |
Re: Pete Rose, 20 years later...HOF or not?
Quote:
 I might agree with those who want him to finish the lifetime ban, as long as he gets inducted the year that he dies. His record as a player deserves to be honored. How can the greatest hitter in the game not be recognized in Cooperstown? As long as he gets in, I'm fine with it. I just hope I'm around to see it. I will admit that I'm very biased on this subject, as I'm a die-hard Reds fan. We're known for three things: being the first professional baseball team, the Big Red Machine, and Charlie Hustle. (No offense to all of the other great Reds players through the years that weren't a part of the BRM: Larkin, Sabo, Davis, F. Robinson, O'Neill, and countless others.)
__________________
 Insert quote here. |
|
|
|
Threaded Mode