|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Have My Own Room
|
![]()
Overpriced, way over priced and absurdly overpriced, at least in my opinion. The 64s are so much better than any 26 that I've had, and for less money. There's no real choice there.
__________________
Formerly Malik23 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
The Homebrew Hammer
|
![]()
I've never had a 40th or an 80th, just too expensive for me to justify the purchase although I've been tempted just to try them.
You didn't ask ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Have My Own Room
|
![]() Quote:
Padron 1926 Padron 1964 Padron 40th Padron 80th? I have only smoked the 1964 (not impressive) and have seen the 1926's, but I don't think I know what a 40th or 80th is.
__________________
Artillery Lends Dignity to What Would Otherwise Be a Vulgar Brawl |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
The Homebrew Hammer
|
![]()
The 40th & 80th are limited releases in the 1926 line. They retail for about $25 and $30 per stick (box price) respectively, compared to about $20/stick of a comparable vitola in the 1926 line. Not entirely sure of the differences--as Dave points out, they're all rolled from the same tobacco but with different aging. And CA named the 40th Cigar of the Year some time ago. I think that might be one of the reasons why Bruce started the thread--to discuss what the differences might be, especially to warrant the higher price.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Feeling at Home
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Feeling at Home
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |