|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I have been watching this from afar up to now.
Inherently I disagree which is my opinion not a statement of fact but it really makes no sense whatsoever. That is like saying if I buy my Windex at the local grocer on the corner that I am going to get a superior product than if I ordered it from Costco online that given that the manufacturer knows it is for Costco they will use a slightly inferior and cheaper formula and charge costco less so they can sell it at a lesser price. It sounds a little absurd when we are talking about window cleaner, yet I believe this is the exact same argument that has been applied. I cannot see it happening, I see no empirical evidence that it is, and I cannot imagine retailers (online) and consumers tolerating it. In fact I would bet that somewhere in the annals of Fair Trade and Market Laws it is illegal to represent them as the same product if they are in fact not. |
![]() |
#3 | |
Crotchety Geezer
|
![]() Quote:
In any case, I do a lot of sensory testing for my job. I realize that you need a lot of samples to have validity in your conclusions. I also realize that there are other possible explanations for the differences that you have observed. I do not doubt at all that you have seen clear preferences for cigars purchased at your B&M compared to online. Why would I? You come here looking for an explanation, which is cool. But you were given the explanation. Age of cigars and possibly humidity of storage. I will, however, contribute money and time to the effort to design and run the experiment to test your hypothesis; as long as you are willing to accept the results of the experiment, as I am. I am willing to accept that I may be wrong ... I am married after all ![]()
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat? |
|
![]() |