Legend's rating system

[icehog3]

Originally Posted by TheRiddick

There is a real danger with point scores. As already mentioned, they are objective to only one person and no one else. While in essence, taste preference is actually a very subjective thing. Thus we attempt to correlate two very different things and that never works.

What's the difference between a 91 point rated cigar and a 92 rated one?

Isn't any rating system subjective, whether numerical or otherwise?

[MajorCaptSilly]

Originally Posted by icehog3

Isn't any rating system subjective, whether numerical or otherwise?

Subjective only in that any rating system is based on the taste of the particular person who is rating the cigar. At least that's what my momma always said.

MCS

[icehog3]

Originally Posted by MajorCaptSilly

Subjective only in that any rating system is based on the taste of the particular person who is rating the cigar. At least that's what my momma always said.

MCS

Exactly....and taste is subjective.

I like you.

[TheRiddick]

Originally Posted by icehog3

Isn't any rating system subjective, whether numerical or otherwise?

Did you see me say they are subjective? Taste is subjective, almost nothing save for math and physics is objective and even there we are dealing with some exceptions to rules.

I pointed out a number of times that any rating/review/observation is only valid for one and only one person.