|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Formerly RX2010
|
I've got 2, all I need for now
the next machine... I think I'll put something ridiculous like 16 in it, just so I can tell Darrell to blow it out his ass |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
ex-CS Swamp Gorilla
|
Not to knock anyone, but why put more than 4 Gb in a PC running Windows XP or Vista 32-bit as the primary OS?
32-bit versions of Windows can only effectively use up to 3120Mb (roughly 3 gigs) due to software limitations (claimed to allow compatibility on older machines), and can be forced into using a full 4Gb via registry changes. Otherwise, the 4th gig is essentially only used by hardware such as shared video memory tasks. Much love to 64-bit OS's for opening that up, but even then Vista was proven to actually SLOW DOWN with more than 16 GB of RAM (inefficient memory use) until Service Pack 1 came out and ended that problem.
__________________
Back in black, and better than ever! You can't keep a good gorilla down! LSU Geaux Tigers! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Feeling at Home
|
Quote:
That's why my next CPU is gonna run a 64-bit OS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Gramps 4x's
Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Horatio Seymore Hiny
Location: Boca Raton - North of La Habana
Posts: 8,774
Trading: (8)
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Little known fact: I am a former member of the Village People - The Indian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
WiP!?
|
Depends Carlos. Current macbooks run 4 gigs no problem, but the pre santa rosa chipset macs will only recognize 3.3 gigs.
__________________
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid - Benjamin Franklin |
|
|
|