|
|
View Poll Results: Is this picture of "plume"? | |||
Yep |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 9.94% |
Nope |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
163 | 90.06% |
Voters: 181. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#61 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I get itchy just looking at it.....and plume doesn't make me itch.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
While most of it does appear to be mold, I do believe there is one distinct area on the cap of the second cigar that is likely to be plume.
Further, it would seem that the label of the first cigar (foreground cigar) also has some faint plume. All in all, I believe this is quite incredible to see plume on a label, especially in the setting of remainder of myco-plume. Cheers Cyanide |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
Where's my buffaloooo ...
![]() |
![]()
And powderer sugar is much more tasty than the regular powered sugar.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I've seen these "cigars" before...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 |
Feeling at Home
|
![]()
I can't have those. I'm on a low carb diet.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#71 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
lucky guys with your plumes
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Wow, that above pic is either:
a) A ton of mold under black light.... or b) Some kind of commentary from someone who hates Gurkhas LOL ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 |
Out of the Ocean!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#74 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
That's quite a moldy seegar... Or somebody sprinkled it with powdered sugar... <G>
|
![]() |