 |
|
|
|
05-12-2013, 12:17 PM
|
#1 |
|
Resident Maduro Whore!!
|
Re: How much stock do you really put into the CA reviews and top 25?
I take absolutely ZERO stock in any of Cigar Aficionados reviews. When your scale is from 96 (best I've seen) to an 86 (worst I've seen)...doesn't leave much room for in between. If I smoked a cigar and thought it was an 86 (based on a scale of 100), I'd say it was a pretty damn good stick. Now if it was a 96, I'd say it was fantastic. If it sucks...why not give it a score of 6? ------Rant off------
 While I faithfully read it each month...still waiting for the day when I purchase my first $ 5,000 pen, $ 35,000 watch and a Lamborghini. 
__________________
 Dom in the MLB thread "I could probably get you to wear a Yankee hat for a Maduro!"
Last edited by kelmac07; 05-12-2013 at 12:27 PM. |
|
|
|
05-19-2013, 06:32 PM
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: How much stock do you really put into the CA reviews and top 25?
[quote=kelmac07;1833349]I take absolutely ZERO stock in any of Cigar Aficionados reviews. When your scale is from 96 (best I've seen) to an 86 (worst I've seen)...doesn't leave much room for in between. If I smoked a cigar and thought it was an 86 (based on a scale of 100), I'd say it was a pretty damn good stick. Now if it was a 96, I'd say it was fantastic. If it sucks...why not give it a score of 6? ------Rant off------
Like you said...zero credibility. Many cigars that absolutely suck are given high reviews. The cigar equivalent to politics!  RR |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
