Opus X BBMF

danreeve · 04-23-2012, 10:56 AM

My review today is for a cigar that was given out at the "White Party" at the 2012 Procigar Festival. Something very special about the 2012 festival was that it was the first year that the Fuente family (the makers of this cigar) were back as full members of the Procigar organization. Luckily for us, we got to add their line of cigars we were able to smoke during the fest.

Now I am far from an expert on Opus products, but I'm going to give a shot at what this cigar was all about. I was told that this BBMF is different from the BBMF that was released in the special Opus coffin gift sets. This BBMF is reserved just for hand outs at big Fuente events or now the Procigar Festival. One difference you can see right away was this cigar didn't have the secondary banding. I was also told that the BBMF was a stronger (or maybe the strongest?) Opus blend produced. Again, I'm not an expert, so maybe someone can leave a comment with more information.

I was lucky to get one of these because, unlike all the other cigars handed out at this dinner, it was not a calm, take-one-off-a-tray atmosphere when these arrived. I saw both big names in the industry and regular attendees taking handfuls of these from the ladies giving them out. Many people in the crowd did not get even one to smoke. Next year? C'mon people, show a little more class and love for your fellow BOTL. (I'm getting off of my soapbox now.)

On to the review.

Specifics
Vitola: Figurado
Length: 6 1/2
Ring Gauge: 64
Wrapper: Dominican
Binder: Dominican
Filler: Dominican
Price: Handout only
Smoking Location: Governors Smokeshop
Beverage: water

Pre-Light
The BBMF is a prime example of one of the crazy, creative shapes Fuente makes for its special or limited releases. (To see some of the other shapes, check out the well-known site Vitolas.) There was a darker colored leaf at the tip of the foot of the cigar and also wrapped around what I would call a brush end cap. I'm sure there is a correct name for that style of cap, but I don't know what it is. After you get past all of the added extras, I'd describe the actual cigar as a well-shaped Figurado. The wrapper was medium brown in color and had zero visible veins. The pre-light aroma was faint, but smelled of some natural sweetness. The cold draw, on the other hand, was very strong and had a lot of fruity tastes to it...lots of raisin and date flavors.

First Third
Ugh, this cigar would not light. I started with trying to light the very small tip of the Figurado with a soft flame lighter and had no luck. Then I tried lighting it with my torch and finally, when I did get it going, I manged to make it burn a big run down the side of the first inch of the cigar. The draw on this stick was so loose and, with the burn issues, getting any smoke out of it during the first third was very difficult. Out of the smoke I did get, the flavors had a lot of white pepper on the front and through the nose, with a bit of wheat taste on the finish. About an inch into the cigar, I started to get some honey sweetness on the front of the profile, too, which kicked back the spicy pepper some. I'd put this cigar in the medium nicotine strength at this point. The flavor was muted, but nice. The burn on the other hand...

Second Third
First thing I want to mention in the second third is something that went for the entire cigar. This stick had one of the flakiest ashes I've ever had. Just lifting the cigar from the ashtray to my mouth, I would see bits of ash float off into the air. The flavors in the second third were dominated on the front by the sweet honey taste with that wheat taste on the finish. Unfortunately, just like the first third, the burn issues continued in the second third. I had to correct this cigar about every five minutes, as it just did not want to burn evenly on all sides. It was frustrating, to say the least, when smoking a cigar of such high expectations. The strength of the cigar did increase a bit and I would put it in the medium to lower full range.

Final Third and Final Thoughts
Well something from the cigar gods happened at the start of the final third and the burn on my BBMF straightened out. Not only did it burn better now, it also tightened up on the draw a bit and I could get much larger clouds of smoke on each puff. Because of all of this the flavor, it increased a lot in strength. With that said, it was still the same flavors from the first and second third, just stronger on my palate (honey and wheat.) This was, by far, the best part of the cigar and thanks to that, I enjoyed this smoke down to the nub. The nicotine strength stayed in the lower full range.

Final thoughts on the Opus X BBMF? When the cigar performed correctly it had a basic, but nice flavor. When it didn't burn or draw correctly, it was incredibility annoying to smoke. Correcting a burn on a cigar is no big deal, but constantly feeling like you have to babysit it or it's going to go out/tunnel is another thing entirely. I'd like to smoke another one to see if mine was just a dud, but I don't see that happening anytime soon. I'd stick with the more traditional Opus X releases if I was paying the top dollar these demand.

Would I buy it again? N/A

Would I buy a box? N/A

For more pictures please visit http://tinyurl.com/cqwks5v

Dan

HollywoodQue · 04-23-2012, 11:04 AM

Thanks for the review Dan. I had a couple of bad experiences with burn and flavor smoothness issues when smoking the opux super belicoso xxx. I didn't let it age long enough cuz the first one I tried was excellent. Haven't had the same experience since. I have one resting the my humi for 1.5yrs, hoping that with 2yrs on it, it will smoke like the very first one I ever tried.

Maybe yours had the same aging issues, and was too moist causing the burn problem.

danreeve · 04-23-2012, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HollywoodQue

Thanks for the review Dan. I had a couple of bad experiences with burn and flavor smoothness issues when smoking the opux super belicoso xxx. I didn't let it age long enough cuz the first one I tried was excellent. Haven't had the same experience since. I have one resting the my humi for 1.5yrs, hoping that with 2yrs on it, it will smoke like the very first one I ever tried.

Maybe yours had the same aging issues, and was too moist causing the burn problem.

maybe so. I have no idea how long they were rolled before the festival, but I let it sit for 6 months.

AlohaStyle · 04-23-2012, 01:17 PM

RG = 64??? Wow, no thanks.

Thanks for the review and story behind it. I can just picture the people grabbing for them...

danreeve · 04-23-2012, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlohaStyle

RG = 64??? Wow, no thanks.

Thanks for the review and story behind it. I can just picture the people grabbing for them...

It's 64 at the fattest point. The head is a average size.

thanks for reading bro!

Dan

Subvet642 · 04-23-2012, 01:32 PM

There are very few things as irritating as struggling with a cigar.

levrac68 · 04-23-2012, 01:46 PM

I had an issue with an opus x I smoked about a month ago. It had a loose pack and slightly loose draw. It burned rather fast, but after a shaky start, it turned out to have the nice flavors that one would expect from that cigar. For the most part they are very good smokes, but IMHO not worth the cost and hype associated with them as compared to a few years ago. That doesn't mean I don't have my share of them in my humidor. I'm just not breaking down doors trying to find them like I used to. If I see them for a steal, I steal em.

04-23-2012, 10:02 PM

I am by no means an Opus expert either, but I have smoked well over 100 (various vitolas) and any time I hear people have burn issues I can't help but think that these were nowhere near being ready to smoke, regardless of RH levels. I try and resist, and age Opus well over a year (at a minimum) and have never had burn issues. The flavor profile also becomes smoother, more complex and less in your face! Thanks for the review!

php007 · 04-26-2012, 08:11 PM

I have smoked several BBMF's without any burn issue, but they were all aged 4 to 6 years.

Thanks for the review.

levrac68 · 04-27-2012, 02:22 PM

Mine was aged 3 years...

Cgarjake · 06-05-2012, 04:01 PM

Just got ahold of two of these going to let them sit for at least five years.

04-23-2012, 10:56 AM	#1
danreeve Feeling at Home Join Date: Jan 2010 First Name: Dan Location: Columbus Ohio Posts: 733 Trading: (2)	Opus X BBMF My review today is for a cigar that was given out at the "White Party" at the 2012 Procigar Festival. Something very special about the 2012 festival was that it was the first year that the Fuente family (the makers of this cigar) were back as full members of the Procigar organization. Luckily for us, we got to add their line of cigars we were able to smoke during the fest. Now I am far from an expert on Opus products, but I'm going to give a shot at what this cigar was all about. I was told that this BBMF is different from the BBMF that was released in the special Opus coffin gift sets. This BBMF is reserved just for hand outs at big Fuente events or now the Procigar Festival. One difference you can see right away was this cigar didn't have the secondary banding. I was also told that the BBMF was a stronger (or maybe the strongest?) Opus blend produced. Again, I'm not an expert, so maybe someone can leave a comment with more information. I was lucky to get one of these because, unlike all the other cigars handed out at this dinner, it was not a calm, take-one-off-a-tray atmosphere when these arrived. I saw both big names in the industry and regular attendees taking handfuls of these from the ladies giving them out. Many people in the crowd did not get even one to smoke. Next year? C'mon people, show a little more class and love for your fellow BOTL. (I'm getting off of my soapbox now.) On to the review. Specifics Vitola: Figurado Length: 6 1/2 Ring Gauge: 64 Wrapper: Dominican Binder: Dominican Filler: Dominican Price: Handout only Smoking Location: Governors Smokeshop Beverage: water Pre-Light The BBMF is a prime example of one of the crazy, creative shapes Fuente makes for its special or limited releases. (To see some of the other shapes, check out the well-known site Vitolas.) There was a darker colored leaf at the tip of the foot of the cigar and also wrapped around what I would call a brush end cap. I'm sure there is a correct name for that style of cap, but I don't know what it is. After you get past all of the added extras, I'd describe the actual cigar as a well-shaped Figurado. The wrapper was medium brown in color and had zero visible veins. The pre-light aroma was faint, but smelled of some natural sweetness. The cold draw, on the other hand, was very strong and had a lot of fruity tastes to it...lots of raisin and date flavors. First Third Ugh, this cigar would not light. I started with trying to light the very small tip of the Figurado with a soft flame lighter and had no luck. Then I tried lighting it with my torch and finally, when I did get it going, I manged to make it burn a big run down the side of the first inch of the cigar. The draw on this stick was so loose and, with the burn issues, getting any smoke out of it during the first third was very difficult. Out of the smoke I did get, the flavors had a lot of white pepper on the front and through the nose, with a bit of wheat taste on the finish. About an inch into the cigar, I started to get some honey sweetness on the front of the profile, too, which kicked back the spicy pepper some. I'd put this cigar in the medium nicotine strength at this point. The flavor was muted, but nice. The burn on the other hand... Second Third First thing I want to mention in the second third is something that went for the entire cigar. This stick had one of the flakiest ashes I've ever had. Just lifting the cigar from the ashtray to my mouth, I would see bits of ash float off into the air. The flavors in the second third were dominated on the front by the sweet honey taste with that wheat taste on the finish. Unfortunately, just like the first third, the burn issues continued in the second third. I had to correct this cigar about every five minutes, as it just did not want to burn evenly on all sides. It was frustrating, to say the least, when smoking a cigar of such high expectations. The strength of the cigar did increase a bit and I would put it in the medium to lower full range. Final Third and Final Thoughts Well something from the cigar gods happened at the start of the final third and the burn on my BBMF straightened out. Not only did it burn better now, it also tightened up on the draw a bit and I could get much larger clouds of smoke on each puff. Because of all of this the flavor, it increased a lot in strength. With that said, it was still the same flavors from the first and second third, just stronger on my palate (honey and wheat.) This was, by far, the best part of the cigar and thanks to that, I enjoyed this smoke down to the nub. The nicotine strength stayed in the lower full range. Final thoughts on the Opus X BBMF? When the cigar performed correctly it had a basic, but nice flavor. When it didn't burn or draw correctly, it was incredibility annoying to smoke. Correcting a burn on a cigar is no big deal, but constantly feeling like you have to babysit it or it's going to go out/tunnel is another thing entirely. I'd like to smoke another one to see if mine was just a dud, but I don't see that happening anytime soon. I'd stick with the more traditional Opus X releases if I was paying the top dollar these demand. Would I buy it again? N/A Would I buy a box? N/A For more pictures please visit http://tinyurl.com/cqwks5v Dan __________________ http://cigarpress.com/

04-23-2012, 11:04 AM	#2
HollywoodQue Invictus Join Date: Oct 2010 First Name: Howard Location: In the "D" Posts: 3,123 Trading: (46)	Re: Opus X BBMF Thanks for the review Dan. I had a couple of bad experiences with burn and flavor smoothness issues when smoking the opux super belicoso xxx. I didn't let it age long enough cuz the first one I tried was excellent. Haven't had the same experience since. I have one resting the my humi for 1.5yrs, hoping that with 2yrs on it, it will smoke like the very first one I ever tried. Maybe yours had the same aging issues, and was too moist causing the burn problem. __________________

04-23-2012, 01:17 PM	#4
AlohaStyle Have My Own Room Join Date: Sep 2009 First Name: Ryan Location: WA Posts: 1,168 Trading: (40)	Re: Opus X BBMF RG = 64??? Wow, no thanks. Thanks for the review and story behind it. I can just picture the people grabbing for them...

04-23-2012, 01:32 PM	#6
Subvet642 Bilge Rat Join Date: Nov 2009 First Name: Darren Location: Torpedo Room Bilge Posts: 2,997 Trading: (13)	Re: Opus X BBMF There are very few things as irritating as struggling with a cigar. __________________ *"Man's mind is his basic tool of survival. Life is given to him, survival is not." -John Galt*

04-23-2012, 01:46 PM	#7
levrac68 Still Watching My Back Join Date: Mar 2012 First Name: Todd Location: Long Island Posts: 118 Trading: (0)	Re: Opus X BBMF I had an issue with an opus x I smoked about a month ago. It had a loose pack and slightly loose draw. It burned rather fast, but after a shaky start, it turned out to have the nice flavors that one would expect from that cigar. For the most part they are very good smokes, but IMHO not worth the cost and hype associated with them as compared to a few years ago. That doesn't mean I don't have my share of them in my humidor. I'm just not breaking down doors trying to find them like I used to. If I see them for a steal, I steal em. __________________ "SOMETIMES A CIGAR IS JUST A CIGAR."- S. FREUD

04-23-2012, 10:02 PM	#8
thecatch83 Guest Posts: n/a	Re: Opus X BBMF I am by no means an Opus expert either, but I have smoked well over 100 (various vitolas) and any time I hear people have burn issues I can't help but think that these were nowhere near being ready to smoke, regardless of RH levels. I try and resist, and age Opus well over a year (at a minimum) and have never had burn issues. The flavor profile also becomes smoother, more complex and less in your face! Thanks for the review!

04-26-2012, 08:11 PM	#9
php007 Adjusting to the Life Join Date: Oct 2008 First Name: Paul Location: Placentia, CA Orange County Posts: 360 Trading: (35)	Re: Opus X BBMF I have smoked several BBMF's without any burn issue, but they were all aged 4 to 6 years. Thanks for the review. __________________ Paul Patel http://s166.photobucket.com/home/php007/allalbums

04-27-2012, 02:22 PM	#10
levrac68 Still Watching My Back Join Date: Mar 2012 First Name: Todd Location: Long Island Posts: 118 Trading: (0)	Re: Opus X BBMF Mine was aged 3 years... __________________ "SOMETIMES A CIGAR IS JUST A CIGAR."- S. FREUD

06-05-2012, 04:01 PM	#11
Cgarjake Just in from the Storm Join Date: Sep 2011 First Name: Jake Posts: 20 Trading: (0)	Re: Opus X BBMF Just got ahold of two of these going to let them sit for at least five years.