Liga Privada Unico Serie L40

[T.G]

Originally Posted by shilala

I can see where you're coming from, Adam.
I tried to very carefully preface my opinions by my comments on not only old "value" blends, but also Padron Annis. Some people prefer aging on nc's on a wide scale, I don't. A couple years, yes. Past a few years, no.
Of all the nc's laying around here that have caught a good amount of age, the Anejo is the only one I can confidently say that really hangs on to some spark. Litto's LGD line does well, just thought of that one.
Time will bear it out. I'd be willing to bet you dinner on it, my friend. Whatta ya think, steaks or Mexican?

Scott, your opinion of the cigar and how it compares to Sancho Panza doble maduros or the 5 Vegas A line is just that, your opinion. I have made no comments on those statements. I think it's great that you feel you can buy a $2-$3 5 Vegas A and for your own enjoyment, get the same profile. Not everyone seems to agree with you, but, I'm honestly glad that you can get off that cheap.

It's your authoritative claims as to the potential of these cigars that I'm addressing. You even went so far in your word of god claims to say that Jonathan, Saka and Brooks all had already proven your statements, when in reality, all that had been said was a benign review by Charlie (not Brooks) and some random commentary by Saka about a different cigar.

If you wish to believe that you have some crystal ball about cigar aging, go for it. Just remember, not even Saka nor Jonathan would come out and make such authoritative statements, and each one of them knows more than the both of us combined. And to top it off, they blended the cigar that you claim to be an expert on after smoking but a single sample.

[shilala]

Originally Posted by T.G

Scott, your opinion of the cigar and how it compares to Sancho Panza doble maduros or the 5 Vegas A line is just that, your opinion. I have made no comments on those statements. I think it's great that you feel you can buy a $2-$3 5 Vegas A and for your own enjoyment, get the same profile. Not everyone seems to agree with you, but, I'm honestly glad that you can get off that cheap.

It's your authoritative claims as to the potential of these cigars that I'm addressing. You even went so far in your word of god claims to say that Jonathan, Saka and Brooks all had already proven your statements, when in reality, all that had been said was a benign review by Charlie (not Brooks) and some random commentary by Saka about a different cigar.

If you wish to believe that you have some crystal ball about cigar aging, go for it. Just remember, not even Saka nor Jonathan would come out and make such authoritative statements, and each one of them knows more than the both of us combined. And to top it off, they blended the cigar that you claim to be an expert on after smoking but a single sample.

Word of god claims, they were? You sure put a lot of faith in me.
If I was confused in my claims, I apologize. I wonder if you've lifted a finger to research and dispute my claims? I already told you I'd go search again as time allows and gather the links for you. I'm sorry that satiating your doubt isn't the driving influence in my life, especially considering you have a keyboard in front of you the same as I do.
I relayed my experiences on cigar aging as my experiences in my and my opinions. Simply that. You're welcome to take it or leave it, as is anyone. Imagine this, you could actually do your own review and voice your opinions.
I'm not sure where I claimed to be an expert on the cigar, but after realizing you think I'm godly, I can see where you'd think that. I'm flattered, but I can assure you, I'm far from godly.
I'm happy to hear your opinions on my opinions, I figure they're about as valuable as mine. I've appreciated your opinions for quite some time, agreed with many, and disagreed with some. I just never felt the need to be condescending.
I think you need a hug.