stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet - Page 7

02-25-2009, 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raralith

Read your replies. Read what you are saying. Read how you are saying it. This should answer why "some of you are really taking this as much harsher than I mean." I'm not taking it personally, but rather responding to your above statement.

Thanks for clearing that up. Its harsh and flailing because you read it that way.

I'm letting you know as the author. That was not my intention. And I've tried to clarify myself. Yet you keep on saying. "no. I originally took it this way so that's what you mean".

Sorry I was originally unclear. Please accept my clarifications.

Col. Kurtz · 02-25-2009, 05:56 PM

Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet

Pot successfully stirred, consensus reached, post unsubscribed.

Thanks for the entertainment friend!

MajorCaptSilly · 02-25-2009, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tedrodgerscpa

That looks to be a triple blind study, which is the strongest test in terms of causality, and is rarely used.

If I wanted to hypothesize that real bullets are deadly and blank bullets are not, I put a mess of bullets in a box. I don't know which bullet is real, and which is blank. Put gun to head, pull trigger.

If I die, I have unmistakeable proof that real bullets are lethal.

However, if I live, I don't necessarily have unmistakeable proof that bullets are lethal, as I may have drawn a blank.

Ted,

I want you to live!!!

Thank you,

MCS

WildBlueSooner · 02-25-2009, 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tedrodgerscpa

That looks to be a triple blind study, which is the strongest test in terms of causality, and is rarely used.

If I wanted to hypothesize that real bullets are deadly and blank bullets are not, I put a mess of bullets in a box. I don't know which bullet is real, and which is blank. Put gun to head, pull trigger.

If I die, I have unmistakeable proof that real bullets are lethal.

However, if I live, I don't necessarily have unmistakeable proof that bullets are lethal, as I may have drawn a blank.

I knew I didnt make this type of experiment up!

02-25-2009, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyJoe

This post is useless without pics...

Well you asked...

NOT SAFE FOR WORK OR CHILDREN...OR SOME WOMEN OR MEN....

DO NOT CLICK ON THIS LINK IT HAS ADULT CONTENT....

NOT SAFE FOR WORK OR CHILDREN...OR SOME WOMEN OR MEN....

There ya go.... for most adults it's fine... just needed to give that warning out there....

cort · 02-25-2009, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hardcz

Well you asked...

NOT SAFE FOR WORK OR CHILDREN...OR SOME WOMEN OR MEN....

DO NOT CLICK ON THIS LINK IT HAS ADULT CONTENT....

NOT SAFE FOR WORK OR CHILDREN...OR SOME WOMEN OR MEN....

There ya go.... for most adults it's fine... just needed to give that warning out there....

I am sooooo offended!!!!!

WildBlueSooner · 02-25-2009, 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hardcz

Well you asked...

NOT SAFE FOR WORK OR CHILDREN...OR SOME WOMEN OR MEN....

DO NOT CLICK ON THIS LINK IT HAS ADULT CONTENT....

NOT SAFE FOR WORK OR CHILDREN...OR SOME WOMEN OR MEN....

There ya go.... for most adults it's fine... just needed to give that warning out there....

Geez...I always hear Canadians loved smut. haha

14holestogie · 02-25-2009, 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gwc4sc

I am sooooo offended!!!!!

Me, too. Box split, anyone?

02-25-2009, 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hardcz

There are some wild accusations here, and people are calling the bluff, unless something can be shown to prove that they are true, then it's not....

Hell I still smoke cc's to get high because they have weed in them.

Does one have to inhale to get any benefit?

WildBlueSooner · 02-25-2009, 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 14holestogie

Me, too. Box split, anyone?

Nope I am taking the box all for myself.

Starscream · 02-25-2009, 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyJoe

This post is useless without pics...

Name: FatWomen.jpg
Views: 468
Size: 32.4 KB

How bout between these b00bs and thighs?

14holestogie · 02-25-2009, 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andysutherland

Attachment 1783

How bout between these b00bs and thighs?

Those are the ones they sell on the internet.

02-25-2009, 06:55 PM

Question for the OP. Are any other guys that hang out with you at your Lounge members of CA? I would like to read their thoughts. Please link me if I missed their input.

Thanks

WildBlueSooner · 02-25-2009, 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 14holestogie

Those are the ones they sell on the internet.

hahahahahahah hilarious

chippewastud79 · 02-25-2009, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andysutherland

Attachment 1783

How bout between these b00bs and thighs?

Now that would be a good experiment to see if the OP and his B+M buddies 'would know the difference between the two 100% of the time'.

Starscream · 02-25-2009, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 14holestogie

Those are the ones they sell on the internet.

02-25-2009, 07:13 PM

and I thought I was a cigar snob

02-25-2009, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 14holestogie

Those are the ones they sell on the internet.

Hilarious

chippewastud79 · 02-25-2009, 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hardcz

and I thought I was a cigar snob

No, just a snob

02-25-2009, 07:19 PM

Oh hey, Legend on CA, trolling the same way you did on CBid, at least the guys here are a little more patient.

02-25-2009, 05:56 PM	#122
Col. Kurtz Have My Own Room Join Date: Jan 2009 First Name: Jerry Location: South Appleton Posts: 1,839 Trading: (26)	Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet Pot successfully stirred, consensus reached, post unsubscribed. Thanks for the entertainment friend!

02-25-2009, 06:55 PM	#133
ahc4353 Guest Posts: n/a	Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet Question for the OP. Are any other guys that hang out with you at your Lounge members of CA? I would like to read their thoughts. Please link me if I missed their input. Thanks

02-25-2009, 07:13 PM	#137
Hardcz Guest Posts: n/a	Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet and I thought I was a cigar snob

02-25-2009, 07:19 PM	#140
Java Guest Posts: n/a	Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet Oh hey, Legend on CA, trolling the same way you did on CBid, at least the guys here are a little more patient.