Boycott Scotch

[TheTraveler]

Originally Posted by ahc4353

Side note that I heard on the way into work today.

Gadhafi will be coming to NYC for a UN meeting in Sept. He owns a 4.4 acre estate in NJ where he will be staying. The 4.4 acre 5.5 million dollar estate is not taxed as it is treated like an embassy.

His next door neighbor pays $60,000 a year in property taxes. I bet he's a happy camper.

As for his visit, I wounder how many of my tax dollars will be spent on his security.

BTW - I hope this ends soon as I only have two bottles of scotch left!

I'd really like to find a way to boycott having my hard-earned money being splurged on someone else. Spent on necessities, yes. National security, yes. Sick, homeless and abused, yes. Law enforcement, yes.

Luxuries and tax breaks, buy your own! There's a box of cigars I've been drooling over and I could get it if you'd just get your hand out of my pocket. Or, while your hand is down there .....



Oops, sorry for the threadjacking.

[macpappy]

Originally Posted by TheTraveler

I'd really like to find a way to boycott having my hard-earned money being splurged on someone else. Spent on necessities, yes. National security, yes. Sick, homeless and abused, yes. Law enforcement, yes.

Luxuries and tax breaks, buy your own! There's a box of cigars I've been drooling over and I could get it if you'd just get your hand out of my pocket. Or, while your hand is down there .....



Oops, sorry for the threadjacking.

That's okay. We're not boycotting threadjacking.

[Genetic Defect]

Originally Posted by macpappy

That's okay. We're not boycotting threadjacking.

I'm boycotting not boycotting

----------------
Now playing: Black Label Society - Black Mass Reverends
via FoxyTunes

[Doctorossi]

Originally Posted by TheTraveler

National security, yes.

Well, think about the idea that that expenditure basically is national security. While giving Khadaffi a tax-break feels lame, it's absolutely pocket-lint on chump-change next to what we'd be spending if we pissed him off and had to send the army after him.

Ounce of prevention, you know?

[Genetic Defect]

Originally Posted by Doctorossi

Well, think about the idea that that expenditure basically is national security. While giving Khadaffi a tax-break feels lame, it's absolutely pocket-lint on chump-change next to what we'd be spending if we pissed him off and had to send the army after him.

Ounce of prevention, you know?

you are right, it would be cheaper to hit him in that tax free home

----------------
Now playing: Black Label Society - Give Yourself to Me
via FoxyTunes

Originally Posted by Doctorossi

Well, think about the idea that that expenditure basically is national security. While giving Khadaffi a tax-break feels lame, it's absolutely pocket-lint on chump-change next to what we'd be spending if we pissed him off and had to send the army after him.

Ounce of prevention, you know?

If we pissed him off???

For some reason I'm not worried about that.

[Doctorossi]

Originally Posted by BC-Axeman

If we pissed him off???

For some reason I'm not worried about that.

Touche!

[bobarian]

Boycott Scotch!


Boycott Libya!

No camel on the bbq this week!