|
04-18-2009, 11:05 AM | #661 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: NHL '08- '09 Thread
Quote:
|
|
04-18-2009, 11:06 AM | #662 |
Admiral Douchebag
|
Re: NHL '08- '09 Thread
Thanks Nate, hopefully they go to Calgary up 2-0!
__________________
Thanks Dave, Julian, James, Kelly, Peter, Gerry, Dave, Mo, Frank, Týr and Mr. Mark! |
04-18-2009, 12:45 PM | #663 | |
Still Watching My Back
|
Re: NHL '08- '09 Thread
Quote:
|
|
04-18-2009, 02:57 PM | #664 |
Really, really old
|
Re: NHL '08- '09 Thread
Congrats Joe. The Canes have a future beyond this round.
__________________
Jimmy, some of its magic, some of its tragic, but I had a good life all the way. He Went to Paris, J. Buffett |
04-18-2009, 10:31 PM | #665 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: NHL '08- '09 Thread
|
04-18-2009, 11:17 PM | #666 |
Feeling at Home
|
Re: NHL '08- '09 Thread
Woo! Im growin a beard too!
__________________
MIAMI CANES 9-4 NJ DEVILS 37-21-3 |
04-18-2009, 11:48 PM | #667 |
Daddy x 4
|
Re: NHL '08- '09 Thread
I would grow one but I have a feeling it will come of soon anyway. Looks like business as usual for the Sharks this post season.
I hope they find their heart for game 2. I have never wanted to see the team torn apart, but if they pull another Epic post season failure I think its time. They almost seem to expect to loose in the post season now. |
04-19-2009, 10:56 AM | #670 | |
Still Watching My Back
|
Re: NHL '08- '09 Thread
Quote:
I don't know what management will do if they get bounced in the first round. Who do you keep, and who do you trade off? It isn't the coaches fault, as I never liked Wilson, but McLellan has a much different attitude, and I don't see that as the problem. At the same time, I don't think of the Ducks as a number 8 seed; they didn't win early, and that cost them big time. Next year, I need to get center ice, as I wasn't able to watch the Hawks-Flames game, and I think that is going to be the best series the first round. |
|
04-19-2009, 11:01 AM | #671 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: NHL '08- '09 Thread
San Jose caught the one team nobody in the West wanted to play in Anahiem. Should be a grinding series but I see the Sharks pulling it out. That said, I still think the Red Wings are the team to beat. But I may be baised!
|
04-19-2009, 02:15 PM | #672 | |
Admiral Douchebag
|
Re: NHL '08- '09 Thread
Yes, they are.....Henrik has been real good as the last kine of defense against Alexander the Great.
Quote:
If San Jose wins, the second round would be: Sharks V. Blackhawks Red Wings V. Canucks If Anaheim wins: Red Wings V. Ducks Canucks V. Blackhawks Looks like either way, the Red Wings and the Blackhawks can only meet in the Conference Finals unless one of the 0-2 teams comes back.
__________________
Thanks Dave, Julian, James, Kelly, Peter, Gerry, Dave, Mo, Frank, Týr and Mr. Mark! |
|
04-19-2009, 04:50 PM | #674 |
Admiral Douchebag
|
Re: NHL '08- '09 Thread
Flyers might make it a series after all.
__________________
Thanks Dave, Julian, James, Kelly, Peter, Gerry, Dave, Mo, Frank, Týr and Mr. Mark! |
04-19-2009, 05:31 PM | #675 |
Feeling at Home
|
Re: NHL '08- '09 Thread
Are we supposed to be worried about blackhawks?? Detroit will take car of them just lile they are taking care of columbus IMHO
Detroit Red Wings 6 Chicago Blackhawks 4 Date: January 1, 2009 City: Chicago, Illinois Arena: Wrigley Field Attendance: 40,818[1]
__________________
"I don't want to have it all, I just want to have enough!! Last edited by jonharky; 04-19-2009 at 05:34 PM. Reason: just thought I'd add this tidbit |
04-19-2009, 06:36 PM | #676 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: NHL '08- '09 Thread
Red Wings rule! Plain and simple. Beard growing as we speak.
|
04-19-2009, 06:53 PM | #677 |
Feeling at Home
|
Re: NHL '08- '09 Thread
Ugh I though thought we were gonna do well. One goal Devils...23 seconds later Carolina scored. Well back to square one
__________________
MIAMI CANES 9-4 NJ DEVILS 37-21-3 |
04-19-2009, 09:17 PM | #679 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: NHL '08- '09 Thread
Overtime for Devils/Hurricanes!
|