|
12-08-2011, 06:48 PM | #21 | |
.. the man from Nantucket
|
Re: Kindle Vs. Kindle Fire
Quote:
I use it mainly to reformat comics to fit the nook color screen better. |
|
12-09-2011, 08:22 AM | #22 |
Bald Man
|
Re: Kindle Vs. Kindle Fire
Actually the Kindle does have a web interface, it's crappy, but it works for certain things.
My wife has the old Kindle DX, it was like 40lbs. The kids and I have the smaller Kindles and she said she wanted one like ours, easier to hold and read in bed. I ended up getting her the Kindle Touch for Christmas. I debated because the style we have allows for the case with the built in light to be used and the Touch doesn't. Which means she'll still have need for a reading light. Oh, well Amazon is great about returns/exchanges so we're going with this model. She considered the Fire but after reading the reviews decided she wouldn't like one. I prefer the standard Kindle for reading, for me the E-ink is a better option. Outdoor use, no back lit screen to keep you up at night...(if the studies are actually true).
__________________
http://jeffcarrollphotos.com Not a photographer, just a dude with a camera. Proud member of the GMCGTPWHAFA Last edited by MrClean; 12-09-2011 at 08:30 AM. |