|
05-23-2012, 08:02 AM | #301 |
Cigar Jesus
|
Re: Game of Thrones
It's an epic battle in the book... they could make this crazy...
|
05-23-2012, 08:30 AM | #302 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Game of Thrones
Great! I hope they don't let their audience down, like they have done in the past.
|
05-23-2012, 10:02 AM | #303 | |
Wee Dram Hunter
|
Re: Game of Thrones
Quote:
If you don't know the books, you can't be too disappointed if the show isn't following them 100%.
__________________
RIP Thurman Lee Munson (June 7, 1947 – August 2, 1979) |
|
05-23-2012, 11:11 AM | #304 |
Swamp Ash member in exile
|
Re: Game of Thrones
I haven't read the books but one of my friends has read all of them, another the first two and both say the idea/story of his books is great but don't think Martin can write well. They enjoy watching the show more & say the dialogue of the show is much better
__________________
"There is true glory and true honor: the glory of duty done, the honor of integrity and principle" - Robert E. Lee |
05-24-2012, 08:32 AM | #308 |
Your resident lancerHO
|
Re: Game of Thrones
Haha! That's awesome Vin
|
05-27-2012, 11:45 PM | #309 |
Snob
|
Re: Game of Thrones
Not a bad episode but again it suffers from focusing on a few characters instead of the whole. Many were not in this episode.
No spoilers so I'll elaborate when everyone seems to have caught up.
__________________
I'm drunk......but I'll get drunker! - Doug Stanhope |
05-28-2012, 11:21 AM | #310 |
Swamp Ash member in exile
|
Re: Game of Thrones
Great episode!
__________________
"There is true glory and true honor: the glory of duty done, the honor of integrity and principle" - Robert E. Lee |
05-28-2012, 12:31 PM | #311 |
Have My Own Room
|
Re: Game of Thrones
__________________
"Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!" Dr. P. Venkman |
05-28-2012, 05:06 PM | #312 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Game of Thrones
|
05-28-2012, 06:37 PM | #313 |
Snob
|
Re: Game of Thrones
Strange I guess I am somewhat alone then or maybe just overly critical. I can't understand why Daenerys Targaryen had zero screen time again. The dragons and whatnot have interested me as to where they will go with it and IIRC with the last 2 episodes she has 1 minute of screen time. The dragons haven't had much screen time either and they were the BIG introduction at the season 1 ending...how deceiving.
Also Jon and the wildlings do not show up in this episode. No one in karth or whatever is in the episode. Also IIRC Rob Stark wasn't in the episode or Lady Stark. Arya Stark wasn't in the episode.....I could continue on but really the only key people in the episode were the Lannisters and Stannis's army. So I have to say....filler episode for the second week in a row. This show REALLY needs more then 10 episodes per season, they are leaving out people all the time. I can't understand how with SO many key characters you have so few episodes. They are trying to tell an epic story with many people and trying do to it in 10 episodes with a few filler episodes here and there. I also didn't find the battle to really be on an epic level. The ships getting taken out was really cool but after that it really felt small scale. Definitely not the massive army I was hoping for. I had also assumed there would be more wellfire or whatnot. The ship was loaded but I figured they would be throwing it down on Stannis's army as well. Seems like the Lannisters had half a plan and Tyrion had to improvise. Not really a rant but I'm done.
__________________
I'm drunk......but I'll get drunker! - Doug Stanhope |
05-28-2012, 08:25 PM | #314 | |
member of the CA MINYAN
|
Re: Game of Thrones
I wouldn't recommend calling anyone in the Boston area a Yankee. It won't go over well (think baseball).
Quote:
__________________
I think Pandora's box was actually a humidor! |
|
05-30-2012, 09:02 AM | #316 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Game of Thrones
Quote:
I agree that they need more episodes. But, this episode was titled blackwater. It was all about the battle. And I can see where some viewers would be disappointed with it. I loved, for one fact only...they didn't skip the scene! Many other battles have happened where we see the start, and then the end with no actual battle scene. It was awesome to actually see some gory battle action. I think you might be forgetting that the show is based on the book, so if a character is not getting screen time, it is simply because they are not getting book time. I have heard from people who read the books that you can go hundreds of pages before circling back to a particular character. With all that being said, the show is called Game of Thrones, I would hardly call this last episode filler, as it was a major fight for the throne. |
|
05-30-2012, 10:44 AM | #317 |
Snob
|
Re: Game of Thrones
I guess I was stating from the fact that the last scene in season 1 was Daenerys Targaryen and the dragons that it would only make logical sense they have a decent bit of time in season 2. However this is not the case, as I said....deceiving and a bit disappointing.
Also, I deemed it filler because who didn't know the Lannisters would prevail? I never read the books but I knew that battle was over for Stannis before the episode aired. So why waste 10% of the season on it? Maybe I just prefer a good story to some action violence I could see in THOUSANDS of movies that has all been done before. I really think all of the problems and my complaints lie in the small seasons for such a big show. Aren't the ratings enough to allow for 2 more shows budget? Even if it's mostly story and nothing big and expensive? Or maybe I just like to b!tch a lot and should just enjoy the show for what it is not what it should be....
__________________
I'm drunk......but I'll get drunker! - Doug Stanhope |
05-30-2012, 11:00 AM | #318 |
Swamp Ash member in exile
|
Re: Game of Thrones
Who could have called that Ned Stark would've gotten his head chopped off at the end of Season 1? I've always heard that the books, and thus the show, are anything but predictable
__________________
"There is true glory and true honor: the glory of duty done, the honor of integrity and principle" - Robert E. Lee |
05-30-2012, 11:24 AM | #319 | |
Your resident lancerHO
|
Re: Game of Thrones
Quote:
The battle at Blackwater was a HUGE part of the book - the tension leading up to it, the preparation leading up to it, the actual battle itself, and then all the character story lines that were affected by the battle - the fact that they dedicated an entire episode to it isn't surprising really. The problem is though, that there is SO much in the book to cram into 10 episodes that you will feel like you're missing out on some things when you don't see most of the characters in one episode. Sure in the books you might go for half a book without hearing from one of the characters, but if you haven't read the books it can easily make the show feel like it's missing pieces. I personally didn't miss Jon, Daenerys, Robb, etc...because I knew they'd be back and the story was busy focusing on Stannis/Tyrion/Sansa. I know this isn't the way it should be, but I feel like anybody who is watching the series should read the books, and anybody who read the books should watch the series. The show SHOULD be able to stand on its own in terms of comprehension of story lines and characters, but it is so much easier to understand it if you've read the books. Since I've read the books I'm just sitting back and enjoying seeing the visuals of all the things I remember, and whatever they're missing from the books I just fill in from my memories. The problem right there is if you haven't read the books you don't have that information |
|
05-30-2012, 11:46 AM | #320 | ||
Cigar Jesus
|
Re: Game of Thrones
Quote:
Quote:
|
||