|
07-21-2010, 08:51 AM | #2541 |
Admiral Douchebag
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
Players Union is expected to grieve the rejection.
__________________
Thanks Dave, Julian, James, Kelly, Peter, Gerry, Dave, Mo, Frank, Týr and Mr. Mark! |
07-21-2010, 09:42 AM | #2542 |
Yet another Masshole
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
I just got my tickets for the '10-'11 season
Go Bruins!!!
__________________
Stock/Finance banter |
07-21-2010, 10:06 AM | #2543 |
Daddy x 4
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
Kind of glad it was rejected.
Its one thing to play on the edge of the rules. This contract was laughing in the rules face. If this is allowed to stand it will begin to eliminate the whole purpose of the cap. As to season tickets. Tried to cancel mine this year. Was not allowed to. Missed the date by a week. Sucks we are refinancing the house and really needed to not have that charge on the card. |
07-21-2010, 05:49 PM | #2544 |
Have My Own Room
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
The Agent for Seguin said a deal should be done before training camp. We'll see??
__________________
"Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!" Dr. P. Venkman |
07-24-2010, 12:04 AM | #2545 |
Admiral Douchebag
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
Andrew Ladd made the most of his day with the Cup.
__________________
Thanks Dave, Julian, James, Kelly, Peter, Gerry, Dave, Mo, Frank, Týr and Mr. Mark! |
07-31-2010, 12:45 PM | #2547 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
|
08-01-2010, 10:30 AM | #2548 |
Admiral Douchebag
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
Niemi ended up getting 2.75 million, significantly less than the 4 million that was anticipated. Bowman still won't say what his plans are, but many arounf Chicago think Niemi still may be gone.
__________________
Thanks Dave, Julian, James, Kelly, Peter, Gerry, Dave, Mo, Frank, Týr and Mr. Mark! |
08-01-2010, 10:36 AM | #2549 |
Daddy x 4
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
beat me to it.
hmmmmm this is really getting spicy now. You guys need to let a dman go and sign him. sharks nneed a good dman. I got to say its good the hawks won the cup because this team while good, won't be quiet as deep this season. atleast I won't have to worry about the wings again. |
08-01-2010, 11:25 AM | #2550 | |
Admiral Douchebag
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
Quote:
__________________
Thanks Dave, Julian, James, Kelly, Peter, Gerry, Dave, Mo, Frank, Týr and Mr. Mark! |
|
08-01-2010, 12:10 PM | #2551 |
Daddy x 4
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
|
08-01-2010, 12:49 PM | #2552 |
Admiral Douchebag
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
Ba-dum.
__________________
Thanks Dave, Julian, James, Kelly, Peter, Gerry, Dave, Mo, Frank, Týr and Mr. Mark! |
08-02-2010, 03:17 PM | #2553 | |
Will herf for food
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
Quote:
__________________
“Eating and sleeping are the only activities that should be allowed to interrupt a man's enjoyment of his cigar;” Mark Twain |
|
08-02-2010, 03:21 PM | #2554 |
Admiral Douchebag
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
Hawks let Niemi walk...signed Marty Turco for 1/2 the money Niemi would have got. I think it will allow the Hawks to have a little flexibility in their fourth line forwards and third pair of d-men, and not just bring up the cheapest options from Rockford. I think it was the right call, but time will tell.
__________________
Thanks Dave, Julian, James, Kelly, Peter, Gerry, Dave, Mo, Frank, Týr and Mr. Mark! |
08-02-2010, 03:55 PM | #2555 | |
Will herf for food
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
Quote:
__________________
“Eating and sleeping are the only activities that should be allowed to interrupt a man's enjoyment of his cigar;” Mark Twain |
|
08-02-2010, 05:31 PM | #2556 |
Admiral Douchebag
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
I ain't worried about the Wings like in years past, Mike. I know they will be right in the mix with their talent, but I think the Hawks are the team to beat in the Central...and Turco didn't have Keith, Seabrook and Hjallmarsson in front of him in Dallas.
__________________
Thanks Dave, Julian, James, Kelly, Peter, Gerry, Dave, Mo, Frank, Týr and Mr. Mark! |
08-02-2010, 06:57 PM | #2557 | |
Daddy x 4
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
Quote:
Over the last 20 yes, but last year your salarycap woes started, the wings escaped the issue till last season do to existing contracts. This year will be the same as last year. I am not trying to be mean, but if you are going to say they are going to be better you should come with some facts to explain this statement. As I said all last season and was proved right by what happened. 1) Last year was the first year the wings had to deal with the cap and as a result they lost depth and got rolled early. They BARELY escaped round 1 going to 7 and got riped by a Sharks team with issues. 2) The team is getting older not younger and why they faded. 3) No one wants to go to the Wings anymore as they know they dont have a chance. Dont believe me? Name a big free agent signing in the past 2 years. No one wants to go to a team whos stars are at the end of their carrer. 4) The years of players taking less to play on the Wings are over. The true championship core is almost all gone. Unfortanetly next years team is the Canucks. The Sharks didnt get the goalie they needed. The Hawks I think lost a touch to much depth to repeat all though they just might. The Wings are not deep enough. Please look at the three teams listed and their stats and rosters. Tell me how the Wings will beat them. |
|
08-02-2010, 08:41 PM | #2558 | |
Opa!!
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
Quote:
Faded? I believe the Wings had the best record after the Olympic break. We do have young players that will continue to be making more of an impact year after year. Plus bringing back Hudler from Russia will add some more consistency to the 3rd line and another 20 goals. The Wings were plainly not ready for the playoffs. Their D was inconsistent and a rookie goaltender didn't help anything in the postseason. There will be even more parody next year. Even with the horrible signing of Turco, the Hawks are still the team to beat. They are too talented to just fade away even with the maneuvering they've been doing. We'll see how the season pans out but the Wings for as long as the injury bug doesn't bite them again they will be better than last year. I'm glad the discussions are already heating up
__________________
"If I give a businessman 10,000 francs, what is that to him, he is rich. But if I give him a Cohiba cigar, that is style."-Hotel Rwanda |
|
08-02-2010, 10:53 PM | #2559 |
Admiral Douchebag
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
I agree with Mike that the Canucks may be the team to beat this year, though as defending Champs I give the Hawks more chance than most.
Son, I know the Wings have some dynamite forwards in Zetterberg, Datsyuk and Franzen. I think the Hawks have that beat with Toews, Kane, Hossa and Sharp, and have a better defensive core...though I know Lidstrom is still maybe the smartest D-man in the league. Goaltending will be huge....can Howard repeat in his sophmore year? Can Turco improve behind a much better defense than he had in Dallas? Will the Sharks go after Niemi or stand pat with Niitymaki? Can Luongo step up to the challenge? That might be the West in a nutshell.
__________________
Thanks Dave, Julian, James, Kelly, Peter, Gerry, Dave, Mo, Frank, Týr and Mr. Mark! |
08-02-2010, 11:48 PM | #2560 | |
Admiral Douchebag
|
Re: NHL '09 - '10 Thread
Quote:
__________________
Thanks Dave, Julian, James, Kelly, Peter, Gerry, Dave, Mo, Frank, Týr and Mr. Mark! |
|