|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Still Watching My Back
|
![]()
In cigars (and beer especially for me), complexity is a multitude of flavors and aromas blending together nicely, but not forming a single flavor or aroma. It is something that has many aspects to it. You may not be able to decipher each flavor and aroma, but it should be noticeable that there are many there.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Dogbert Consultant
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() stearns
__________________
"Ignoring all the racket of conventional reality" - Keller Williams |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Man in Black!!!
|
![]()
Complex- Means to me multiple rich flavours coating my palate!!!
__________________
"If my answers frighten you then you should cease asking scary questions." "Hav-a-na nice day" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Country Gentleman
|
![]()
Very interesting on some of the replies. Personally, if a cigar has a nice set of flavors that are balanced, I describe the cigar as balanced not complex. But that is what it means to ME. I do like T.G.'s response of dynamic vs complex and maybe that is more in line to how I should describe it.
To me balance seems more of the multiple flavors that combine and i can't pick out some, but it's still all in "balance" to me. Where as complex, I can describe or pick out each flavor. LOL, but that's backwards it seems to most of the replies so far. I really enjoy the replies. Sometimes words are used and they can have certain meanings based on a person's understanding of it. And that may not translate well to someone who smokes that same cigar and finds it "different" for lack of a better term.
__________________
'It is an honor for a man to keep aloof from strife; But every fool will be quarrelling.' |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Have My Own Room
|
![]()
Can a terrible cigar be called complex? For example if it has a layering of multiple flavors; cat piss, old cardboard, gas fumes and paint... is it complex?
__________________
Try my Cigar Glue |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Have My Own Room
|
![]() Quote:
That said, yes, bad cigars can have complexity. Complexity isn't always enjoyable. Just like chics.... complex can be good.... or crazy bad. I had a Sig II the other evening that was either too young or sick and it was complex, but shitty. Almonds, Tannin, Wet Hay, and Citrus throughout I could pick em all out, but bitter Almond and tannin killed it.
__________________
Pretending to play golf since 1989 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
IMO, Yes, a dog-rocket can still be complex. Taste is subjective.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Have My Own Room
|
![]() Quote:
Interesting, I have only heard "complex" used to describe what were reported to be "good" cigars... I like to use words to describe cigars that cannot be contextualized; twangy, oomph, rich, chewy and of course complex... If these words are subject to individual interpretation, as discussed with complex, what is the purpose of using them...? It would seem they present no consumable value to the target audience...
__________________
Try my Cigar Glue |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Admiral Douchebag
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Twang? I don't like that one. ![]()
__________________
Thanks Dave, Julian, James, Kelly, Peter, Gerry, Dave, Mo, Frank, Týr and Mr. Mark! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Have My Own Room
|
![]() Quote:
Oh and about a cigar tasting twangy, prolly better than tasting wangy...
__________________
Try my Cigar Glue |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Admiral Douchebag
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Thanks Dave, Julian, James, Kelly, Peter, Gerry, Dave, Mo, Frank, Týr and Mr. Mark! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Got Torque?
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Resident Whisky Addict
|
![]()
I agree with Tim - while I think complex is generally used to describe a positive aspect of a cigar, it needs explanation - just like Tim's explanation of the Sig II.
Dog rockets can be complex - don't believe me? Feed your dog a buffet and wait... |
![]() |
![]() |