|
09-04-2009, 09:43 PM | #1 |
Gonna make you groove...
|
Padilla Signature 1932 Robusto
I'm smoking a Padilla Signature 1932 robusto. I don't recall who I got it from. It started out very spicy and leathery. I can't compare it to any of the DPG's as I'm not familiar enough, but I couldn't snork it. Would have blown my top off.
After the first inch it settled into a nice smooth chocolate and earthy favor. For some reason it reminds me of an autumn forest. The burn remains nice and sharp throughout. The aroma of the cigar resting on the ashtray is lovely. At the half way mark I'm getting flavors of espresso. I'm very impressed with this cigar. The spice increases a bit, but not so mich as the first inch. Towards the end the cigar becomes a little ashy flavored. I try to stick with it for a bit, but I'n not enjoying the ashiness, so I let it die. Overall I liked this cigar very much. I'd score it 8 out of 10. Definitely one I'd buy. Posted via Mobile Device |
09-04-2009, 09:54 PM | #3 |
Adjusting to the Life
|
Re: Padilla Signature 1932 Robusto
This was the first cigar I ever smoked that made me think "man, I want to do THAT again!" Love the whole 1932 line.
__________________
Not an Aficionado... |
09-04-2009, 10:49 PM | #4 |
Gonna make you groove...
|
Re: Padilla Signature 1932 Robusto
Ufda! I just looked at CI. I had no idea these cigars were so pricey. Yowza! Whoever gave this to me, thank you!
__________________
"We live in the good of this." |
09-04-2009, 10:54 PM | #6 | |
Adjusting to the Life
|
Re: Padilla Signature 1932 Robusto
Quote:
__________________
Not an Aficionado... |
|
09-05-2009, 09:23 AM | #9 |
Just plain insane!
|
Re: Padilla Signature 1932 Robusto
These are one of my favorite NCs. They have been blowing them out on cBid so I have been stocking up!!
|
09-05-2009, 11:54 AM | #10 |
My barn door is open
|
Re: Padilla Signature 1932 Robusto
Nice review on a great cigar! I think Pepin stopped making these about a year ago. My understanding is the new blend just has a different wrapper.(feel free to correct me if I'm wrong) I have some of each blend with about a years age on them and they both are smoking well. The Pepin might have a little more kick to it, but i honestly don't think I could tell which is which in a blind taste test. Like others have said there are some good deals on these if your patient.
|
09-05-2009, 10:13 PM | #12 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Padilla Signature 1932 Robusto
Have some lancero. Nice and oily. Love to try a robusto! Nice review, matey.
|
09-07-2009, 09:55 AM | #15 | |
Formerly known as RPguy
|
Re: Padilla Signature 1932 Robusto
Quote:
Great review and I would agree with it totally! Thanks!
__________________
"This cigar tastes like the weekend!" - JBoogie |
|
09-07-2009, 11:42 AM | #16 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Padilla Signature 1932 Robusto
Thanks for the great review.
|
09-07-2009, 11:52 AM | #17 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Padilla Signature 1932 Robusto
hmmmm i think i have one of these i may have to burn it
|
09-07-2009, 09:35 PM | #18 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Padilla Signature 1932 Robusto
Always keep my humidor with at least half a box of these,,,always a good smoke.
|
09-10-2009, 03:11 PM | #19 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Padilla Signature 1932 Robusto
one of my first, and to this day favorite, smokes. I don't think I have had one since Pepin stopped making them, though.
|
09-10-2009, 08:47 PM | #20 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Padilla Signature 1932 Robusto
Quote:
But both the Padilla 1932 and Miami (as well as the old Miami 8&11) were blended by Ernesto Padilla, NOT by Pepin. They were assembled in Pepin's factory, though, until about a year (year and a half?) ago. Ernesto was very involved in the process with Pepin back then, and of course now that it's being assembled in his shop as well. I don't know if Don Pepin "consulted" on the blends in any way or not, but according to Pepin and Padilla they were both totally Ernesto Padilla creations. I personally don't care, but I like Pepin's cigars a lot and think these Padillas taste good enough to be up there with those, imvho. The 1932 is supposedly the exact same cigar in every way, just rolled on different tables. I won't tell you that makes no difference, it very well may. Again, I've not had the Pepin-rolled version of the 1932 either (though by definition that now has a decent amount of age on them, making a side-by-side difficult). All I know is that the "new" 1932s are one of my favorite cigars. They're just great in every way to me, one of my go-to "nice" cigars along with the Tat Havana VI line. I love the 1932 toro a LOT, but just had a lancero a couple days ago and that was a really fabulous cigar! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|