|
|
View Poll Results: Should Pete Rose be in the Hall of Fame? | |||
Rose should be in the Hall. | 62 | 65.26% | |
Rose should not be in the Hall. | 20 | 21.05% | |
Depends (discuss below). | 7 | 7.37% | |
I could care less. | 6 | 6.32% | |
Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-29-2009, 03:56 PM | #102 |
Gonna make you groove...
|
Re: Pete Rose, 20 years later...HOF or not?
Excellent point. Neither Mantle or Mays were never even remotely alleged to have gambled on baseball games. Their only "crimes" were that they were hired to be greeters at casinos well after they retired from MLB. Wear a sport coat, greet patrons of the casino, sign autographs, etc. For this they were banned from baseball for life.
__________________
"We live in the good of this." |
07-29-2009, 04:13 PM | #103 | |
WiP!?
|
Re: Pete Rose, 20 years later...HOF or not?
Quote:
__________________
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid - Benjamin Franklin |
|
07-29-2009, 04:24 PM | #104 | |
Gonna make you groove...
|
Re: Pete Rose, 20 years later...HOF or not?
Quote:
Hall of Famer Willie Mays, who had also taken a similar position, had already had action taken against him. Mantle accepted the position, regardless, as he felt the rule was "stupid." He was placed on the list, but reinstated on March 18, 1985, by Kuhn's successor, Peter Ueberroth.
__________________
"We live in the good of this." |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|