|
02-17-2009, 10:24 AM | #42 |
Ayatollah of Rock n Rolla
|
Re: Legend's rating system
THREADJACK
borndead1's rating system: Fantastic -- must stockpile as many as I can Very good -- nice smoke, will keep some on hand Meh -- hold onto them and see if they get better YUCK -- throw them away |
02-17-2009, 10:31 AM | #43 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Legend's rating system
|
02-17-2009, 12:23 PM | #44 |
Non-believer
|
Re: Legend's rating system
Legend,
I have no issues with your system or anyone else's. I did and do have an issue with anyone who claims "his system" is better than someone else's and then coming up with a "myth" to prop up the argument. Its never "better", simply different. That's all. Rate cigars you smoke and enjoy in any which way, all I care to see is the actual description of the experience, score independent. |
02-17-2009, 12:25 PM | #45 |
Bunion
|
Re: Legend's rating system
I thought I stole my system from someone reliable ... but I guess it was just Dave.
__________________
I refuse to belong to any organization that would have me as a member. ~ Groucho Marx |
02-17-2009, 12:33 PM | #46 | |
YNWA
|
Re: Legend's rating system
Quote:
Best to just deal with it and move on.
__________________
Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are. -John Wooden |
|
02-17-2009, 12:56 PM | #47 | |
Juan of 11
|
Re: Legend's rating system
Quote:
Da Klugs also sends his thanks for the sharing and he feels that there is no one perfect system just us imperfect smokers. As such, he will continue to use his rambling dialog format for cigar review and rankings. FWIW - Da Klugs also has a rarely used 5 point scale.... http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/showpo...91&postcount=1
__________________
Communities Not Commodities. Punctuation challenged, but trying. Proud winner of phase 1 of the Weight loss contest Last edited by Da Klugs; 02-17-2009 at 01:04 PM. |
|
02-17-2009, 01:35 PM | #48 |
Got Torque?
|
Re: Legend's rating system
|
02-17-2009, 02:21 PM | #49 |
Bunion
|
Re: Legend's rating system
vstrommark had no intentions of making fun of anyone ... wait a sec ... he did!
__________________
I refuse to belong to any organization that would have me as a member. ~ Groucho Marx |
02-17-2009, 02:23 PM | #51 |
Non-believer
|
Re: Legend's rating system
There is a number of legal cases now in (or past) courts against online posters stating either "myths" or non-factual data and courts are siding with the businesses who are filing the lawsuits, as they SHOULD. But its your board and your call, of course.
|
02-17-2009, 02:34 PM | #53 | |
Juan of 11
|
Re: Legend's rating system
Quote:
Just funnin. It's all good. Anyone is free to use whatever rating system they want. Given all of the good discussion on the topic, folks will place whatever weighting and adjustments they feel fit to based upon the circumstances. Personally, I've chosen to buy and or try many things based upon members smoking and posting thoughts within our community. An early lesson there is that we are all prejudiced by our inventory. One of the greatest things about our hobby is that the subject matter changes over time. One box of cigars smoked over a many year period can yield a surprisingly wide variety of results from just one reviewer.. be they numeric or descriptive. Another parallel is that the reviewers change over time as well. Add to that input from different smokers and you have the layered complexity of our little world. Helps put the "discussion" in cigar.... board.
__________________
Communities Not Commodities. Punctuation challenged, but trying. Proud winner of phase 1 of the Weight loss contest Last edited by Da Klugs; 02-17-2009 at 02:50 PM. |
|
02-17-2009, 07:08 PM | #55 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Legend's rating system
Legend feels that the botl here feel that occasionally referring to yourself in the third person starts a trend.
|
02-17-2009, 07:30 PM | #56 |
YNWA
|
Re: Legend's rating system
Not exactly.
__________________
Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are. -John Wooden |
02-17-2009, 07:34 PM | #57 |
Bunion
|
Re: Legend's rating system
VstromMark feels that Peter properly conveys the subtlety of the situation
__________________
I refuse to belong to any organization that would have me as a member. ~ Groucho Marx |
02-17-2009, 07:35 PM | #58 |
YNWA
|
Re: Legend's rating system
pnoon (the pseudo-Arsenal fan) concurs.
__________________
Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are. -John Wooden |
02-17-2009, 07:43 PM | #59 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Legend's rating system
Al wonders what a butler's butler might think.
Last edited by ahc4353; 02-17-2009 at 07:49 PM. |
02-17-2009, 08:36 PM | #60 |
.090909...
|
Re: Legend's rating system
mmblz thinks the man behind the butler would approve of the use of the 3rd person but find the rating system lacking in its ability to talk about congeners...
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|