Watch out for Third-hand Smoke

Originally Posted by BigCat

With all due respect, that statement is completely contradictory. Scientists who depend on grants from anti-smoking groups are going to be inherently biased - anti-smoking groups aren't funding any more studies if the scientists don't come out against smoking. There goes the scientists' money.

On top of this, unless the study was truly double-blind, then bias will be present. Has this even been peer-reviewed yet?