Does It Really Matter If Reviews Have Pics?

Now, there are some guys that I wish would post pics as it would take up some of the room they use to write legendary long reviews.

Originally Posted by ahc4353

Now, there are some guys that I wish would post pics as it would take up some of the room they use to write legendary long reviews.

[chippewastud79]

I like to put pictures of the cigar before I light it, mostly because it helps other people identify it if they don't know it by name (which most of the time I don't). Plus a photo of the cigar makes up for my lack of knowledge in descriptions. And then maybe one more picture of something unique (long ash, attrocious burn or just a neat looking photo).

I can appreciate reviews without pictures as well as long as the reviewer gives some good information. Thanks to the Team for limiting us to 5 pictures, because when you see eleventy billion pictures in one review it is worthless to see every draw as a new picture.

Originally Posted by Da Klugs

It's the little things that make life worth living.... like seeing and laughing about these 2 posts being one after another.

Now thats funny

[Whee]

Pics are nice for the inmates who have problems with big words...

For me, taking the pics is just part of the process, makes it more fun for me to do.

But a review is a review. A bad review with pics, is still a bad review.

So let's review....

pics=optional
well conveyed review=good!

[mcmoyer]

Phhttt...who needs pictures? Take their bands off & turn 'em upside down and the all look alike.



I do enjoy a well written review!!