What's your "MONEY" cigar?

[Sawyer]

I have to go with OZ and pick the Siglo II. Always hits the spot and I have never had any problems with them.

[Kreth]

It's a low-cost cigar, but the Perdomo Slow-Aged Lot 826 has been really consistent for me. Every one I've smoked has been tasty, with either wrapper.

[JJG]

Originally Posted by Kreth

It's a low-cost cigar, but the Perdomo Slow-Aged Lot 826 has been really consistent for me. Every one I've smoked has been tasty, with either wrapper.

I don't smoke much so I usually stick to the good stuff but I was given one of these in a trade and I couldn't believe it was actually really good. In fact I was sitting there laughing and shaking my head in disbelief.

As for me, Padron Londres and Boli PCs. Always great and always perfectly consistent in taste, draw, burn, etc...

pepin blue label fundadores

[Kreth]

Originally Posted by JJG

I don't smoke much so I usually stick to the good stuff but I was given one of these in a trade and I couldn't believe it was actually really good. In fact I was sitting there laughing and shaking my head in disbelief.

I got my first in a PIF. I liked it so much I bought a bundle. I also really like the Sancho Panza Double Maduro. I'll never turn my nose up at a cheap cigar I haven't tried, cause I've found two that I really enjoy.

[GrtndpwrflOZ]

Originally Posted by Sawyer

I have to go with OZ and pick the Siglo II. Always hits the spot and I have never had any problems with them.

The only problem I have is with PAYING FOR THEM. In my world they are not an "inexpensive" smoke.

[thebiglebowski]

NC - Chisel
CC - Upmann No 2 or Siglo III

[Sawyer]

Originally Posted by GrtndpwrflOZ

The only problem I have is with PAYING FOR THEM. In my world they are not an "inexpensive" smoke.

I have that same problem. If they were cheaper I would definitely smoke a lot more of them than I do now.