Moncada cigars?

[MarkinAZ]

Originally Posted by icehog3

Restricting it to posting by inmates with 2 or more posts?

.. Well, that sort of puts a damper on things

[icehog3]

Originally Posted by MarkinOR

.. Well, that sort of puts a damper on things

Only for the shills and shysters, Mark.

[borndead1]

HAHAHAHA this is one of the weirdest threads I've read on CA in a long time!

So...how are these Moncada cigars? Any good?

[icehog3]

Originally Posted by borndead1

HAHAHAHA this is one of the weirdest threads I've read on CA in a long time!

So...how are these Moncada cigars? Any good?

A first time poster will come around to give them a glowing review sometime in the next 2 to 9 months.

[Weelok]

Originally Posted by icehog3

A first time poster will come around to give them a glowing review sometime in the next 2 to 9 months.

It’s a reliable prediction that I’m guessing aligns with a cruise ship travel season.

[mjcujo]

Originally Posted by Weelok

It’s a reliable prediction that I’m guessing aligns with a cruise ship travel season.

OK, I'll bite. And, yes, this is my very first post to this forum.

I bought this stick at the cigar stand in the tourist (cruise ship) village on Roatan, Honduras. The stand was manned by a young lad who spoke very good English, and his "mother", reportedly the cigar roller, who apparently spoke none. They were selling several sizes in boxes and bundles, and had a number of loose irregulars that they were selling by the stick. I grabbed a handful of these, thinking, "what the heck."

The first one I smoked was roughly a toro in size (~6x52), and had a nice, medium brown, silky wrapper (the young lad at the stand called it an "oscuro", but it was not nearly dark enough to attain that standard), and a short, torpedo-like cap. Construction looked and felt superb, with a consistently firm body (no soft spots), very light veining, and flawless wrapper and cap. The foot appeared evenly and tightly packed.

I cut the cap about half way along the torpedo shape to get the draw I like, and toasted the foot. I'm not the guy to go to for flavor notes and nuances. I would consider this a medium bodied smoke with pleasant, mellow flavor, even on the retro-hale. Nothing too spicy, peppery or harsh.

The ash built up light and flaky, and I could only accumulate about 3/4-inch before it fell off the stick. Ample smoke was generated while actively smoking, and it dropped quickly to a very slow smolder on the rest.

The burn line was a little jagged, but otherwise even. Certainly nothing close to requiring any corrections.

The mild flavor(s?) held steady to the end. More mild than I tend to gravitate toward, but very pleasant nonetheless. I usually pair my smokes with a good whisky(ey), but smoked this one with a cup of hot chamomile tea. I would definitely recommend drinking something that will leave your taste buds intact to get the most out of this cigar.

As others have noted, this is a really good, inexpensive (if you don't include the cost of travel) cigar. No regrets.

[Porch Dweller]

Originally Posted by borndead1

HAHAHAHA this is one of the weirdest threads I've read on CA in a long time!

So...how are these Moncada cigars? Any good?

They do exist and they are tasty. I pick some up every time we cruise through Roatan.

[icehog3]

Originally Posted by Weelok

It’s a reliable prediction that I’m guessing aligns with a cruise ship travel season.

[Wharf Rat]

Originally Posted by borndead1

HAHAHAHA this is one of the weirdest threads I've read on CA in a long time!

So...how are these Moncada cigars? Any good?

Does the OP get a weirdest thread prize? The ones my Mom brought back were reasonably good, cheap stogies.

[icehog3]

Originally Posted by Wharf Rat

Does the OP get a weirdest thread prize? The ones my Mom brought back were reasonably good, cheap stogies.

Yes! A fiver of Moncada cigars from the next first time poster in the thread!