Cigar Asylum Cigar Forum  

Go Back   Cigar Asylum Cigar Forum > Cigar Forums > Island (The other ones) Reviews

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-30-2010, 05:42 PM   #1
RevSmoke
Ain't Never Gonna Leave
 
RevSmoke's Avatar
5
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Todd
Location: Northcentral woods of Wisconsin
Posts: 6,861
Trading: (51)
HUpmann
RevSmoke has a brilliant futureRevSmoke has a brilliant futureRevSmoke has a brilliant futureRevSmoke has a brilliant futureRevSmoke has a brilliant futureRevSmoke has a brilliant futureRevSmoke has a brilliant futureRevSmoke has a brilliant futureRevSmoke has a brilliant futureRevSmoke has a brilliant futureRevSmoke has a brilliant future
Default Opus X Power Ranger

This original review was written after I bought two of these and had smoked one, it was originally posted somewhere else. The original review was written on March 22, 2008. I know that I had bought the cigars at least 3 months before smoking the first.

Well, I smoked the other on Friday evening up at deer camp. So, I thought I'd post the original review, and add highlights to it bolded in red.

Hope you enjoy.

Fuente Fuente Opus X Belicoso XXX Power Ranger??? (at least that is what I think it is)

A short belicoso, about 4.5X50, a red band around the foot. It is in the wrong box at the B&M. Got it for $17.00. Pulled the trigger on it because the rest of the gorillas here have been talking up Opus Xs.

0.0 - 2.0 = poor/inferior quality
2.1 - 2.9 = fair
3.0 - 3.5 = good
3.5 - 4.5 = excellent
4.6 - 5.0 = superior

1) Aesthetics: This had a gorgeous, reddish brown (used to be called a Colorado Maduro??) wrapper. Veins were minimal and a light sheen of oil glistened beckoningly (is that a real word - or have I just adverb-ized a word - do I get credit for i?) OK, I think you get the idea that it looks great. Yes, this one was also a great looking stick, very consistent with my first review. I must say, the bands on Opus are exquisite.
Score for aesthetics: 4.9

2) Pre-light Construction: This is a dense and tightly rolled stick. I nose both the length and the foot of this cigar - it is enticing with spice predominant along the length and robust tobacco smell at the food (sorry, that’s a real description) Nothing new to add here. This one also gave off the spice and smelled enticing.
Score for Pre-light construction: 4.7

3) Post-light Construction/How it smoked: I didn’t have a problem with the draw, that was easy. No soft spots. It remained nice and cool. The ash was flaky white and held for a good inch to inch & a half. But... This bad boy couldn’t burn straight to save it’s soul. I even set it down and let it go out to try and restart it. It only evened out the last inch and a half. Way too late to make me happy. This version didn't even out for the last inch. It could not keep a straight burn. The ash on this however had no flakiness and held tenaciously for a good 2 inches.
Score for post-light construction: 2.2 2.1

4) Flavor and strength: I must say, I did like it. It wasn’t a powerhouse that knocked me over, but there was a nice spice that came through the entire length, sometime stronger, sometimes weaker, but never gone. There was a complexity that was wonderful - earthiness, sweet, rich, and very tasty. The flavors were wonderful; spicy, slightly sweet, with an earthly complexity that was truly enjoyable. There was a flavor here that I couldn't put my finger on, intriguing and immensely enjoyable.
Score for flavor and strength: 4.5 4.8

5) Aftertaste/Finish: Score for aftertaste: This finished with spice and cinnamon, pleasantly lingering for a few moments. I didn't find the cinnamon this time, but the finish lingered for a bit.
Score for aftertaste/finish: 4.3

6) Aroma: This one had a fairly nice aroma, I enjoyed the side-slip smoke. It was med-bodied, again that spiciness lingering there. To me, one of my favorite aspects of a smoke is the aroma. This was great, with spice and something else, that flavor/aroma I couldn't identify. Again, I enjoyed the complexity.
Score for aroma: 4.5

7) General Comments: Well, this wasn’t bad, not bad at all. I must say that I really like the flavors and it is pretty to look at, that part almost lives up to the hype. The band itself is a work of art. But.. do I really consider the price worth the smoke? Considering I’ve had two in my lifetime and both of them burned so unevenly bothers me. I should be able to just sit back and enjoy a stick in this price range. But, those are the musings. The flavors and aesthetics are definitely there. Maybe I’m just a tightwad... If they were near $10 a stick, I think I’d be less reluctant. Not that this isn’t a great smoke, but whether it is worth it to me is a different question.

I'd say this pretty much sums up my feelings again. I don't like wrestling with the burn on a cigar, call me lazy that way, but I shouldn't have to grab my torch every 3/4 inch to even out a burn that has gone incredibly erratic. And no, humidity had nothing to do with it, for this has been in my humidor for over two years at about 62-64%. I really enjoyed the flavors, but I didn't think that from my note, there was much difference between this one and the previous one. Did the aging make a difference in taste? I don't believe so, not at least to make a significant difference.
Overall score for the cigar: 4.3

Peace of the Lord be with you.
__________________
Todd__ "Smoke what you like, and enjoy it!"
RevSmoke is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content is copyrighted jointly by Cigar Asylum and the content provider.