|
07-13-2011, 08:07 PM | #1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
lou2row's blind reviews; it begins
The cigars have been sent today. The panel was chosen from here and members from another board. I will post results on both boards.
The elitist panel of experts is: Hoyodude (cbid); d.c.# 9405503699300158965229 jimbud (cbid): d.c.# 9405503699300158965182 tj2001cobra (cbid): d.c.# 9405503699300158965199 hscmit (cbid, hut, asylum): d.c.# 9405503699300158965212 emjaysmash: (asylum): d.c.# 9405503699300158965175 SteveH (asylum, cigars 1-4) d.c.# 9405503699300158965205 Let me know when they land. I have my review format I will pm each of you. I also have it in excel (nice for using to take notes on while smoking), and word (to send to me in). Get me your email address and I can email them to you if you want them (lou2row@hotmail). I also have a "flavors wheel" sheet. I stole the idea from a wine tasting brochure that is of help when you can't really tell what a particular taste is. Steve, #5 is the only stick I didn't have enough, so you are in for 1 through 4. I know it is tough to get reviews in from six people in a timely fashion, but this way if someone gets sick or has a family emergency we can still run with five. |
07-13-2011, 08:48 PM | #3 |
The Cigar Artist
|
Re: lou2row's blind reviews; it begins
How did I miss getting in on this thing?
Have fun guys!! I love reading blind reviews. M
__________________
Cigar Art available for sale: www.mikeuhren.com |
07-14-2011, 10:27 PM | #4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: lou2row's blind reviews; it begins
|
07-14-2011, 11:05 PM | #5 |
Grrrrrr
|
Re: lou2row's blind reviews; it begins
Nice to see that you brought this over here Lou.
Now, just don't ship anyone any Independencias as part of the taste test. I still haven't forgiven you for that my friend. |
07-15-2011, 08:42 AM | #6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: lou2row's blind reviews; it begins
It was a new box! They changed em and I didn't know they got milder. Not as bad as you guys made them out, but not something I would have put in a review sampler if I knew.
|
07-15-2011, 04:34 PM | #9 |
The Hebrew Hammer
|
Re: lou2row's blind reviews; it begins
Got them today as well. Thank Lou! Let me know when you want the first one done.
Still wiating for the review format.
__________________
|
07-15-2011, 04:48 PM | #10 |
You lookin at me ?
|
Re: lou2row's blind reviews; it begins
Lou -
WHOA - got mine today...Thanks ! Please shoot me the details. I gotta say - I really enjoyed your labels...#3 is....awesome ! |
07-15-2011, 05:57 PM | #11 |
Have My Own Room
|
Re: lou2row's blind reviews; it begins
format is
Construction: Prelight: First Third: Draw: Burn: Ash/Smoke: Second Third: Final third: Strength: Flavor: Overall: Scoring Construction: /10 Prelight: /5 First Third: /15 Draw: /10 Burn: /10 Ash / Smoke: /10 Second Third: /10 Final Third: /10 Overall impression: /20 Total Score: /100 |
07-16-2011, 06:19 AM | #12 |
You lookin at me ?
|
Re: lou2row's blind reviews; it begins
Thanks. Interesting ratio used - IMO 1st/2nd/3rd should be equal in rating...If anything maybe bump draw up to keep 100pts as that's something that affects the entire smoking experience...
Just my $0.02...I'll go along with whatever the man wants though |
07-16-2011, 02:47 PM | #13 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: lou2row's blind reviews; it begins
Quote:
I agree that draw is more valuable than ash or burn, but it usually plays itself out in the thirds values by lowering your enjoyment throughout the cigar. When doing this format, I intentionally smoked two of the worst cigars I had tried to see how the formula worked. Free Cuba came in at 54 (nice draw and construction, but "stomach acid after vomiting" was one of the flavor profiles) and a 47 for another one that was a train wreck construction and smoking wise. This grades out more like a school test score than CA's 100 point system that only uses about 86 to 94. And it leaves frugal shoppers as well as elitists with their own way to judge. Scoring: 90-100: An exceptional cigar. Recommended to any smoker. 80-90: A very good cigar. Only minor issues keep this from top rating. 70-80: A good cigar with some minor flaws. Price starts to play into purchasing. 60-70: A decent yard or utility cigar. Some palates will not care for this grade of cigar. <60: Not good at any price. Discourage others from purchasing. |
|
07-16-2011, 03:09 PM | #14 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: lou2row's blind reviews; it begins
The unbalanced score through the thirds was because so much seems to go on in the first third. It kind of makes or breaks the cigar, so a little higher value was placed. The final third usually varies in testers, due to if complex or boring, or if it turns hot or bitter.
formats have been emailed to Steve, Emjay, and Hoyo. If you want to give the cigars a couple days to acclimate in your humidors, that is fine. One package is going to Texas, so TJ will probably have to give them a couple days for sure. |
07-17-2011, 08:44 AM | #15 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: lou2row's blind reviews; it begins
In case anyone didn't see it, you are to email your reviews to me. Once I have them all I will post them up together. Luckily the new cbid format allows editing.
This keeps any later reviewers from being turned by an earlier review. |
07-21-2011, 01:47 PM | #17 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: lou2row's blind reviews; it begins
Looking forward to watching this one as it plays out. I love blind reviews!
|
07-21-2011, 02:55 PM | #18 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: lou2row's blind reviews; it begins
|
07-21-2011, 05:43 PM | #20 |
Have My Own Room
|
Re: lou2row's blind reviews; it begins
The timing actually worked out great, the last 5 nights I have had a nice cigar to enjoy and take my mind off of everything else with.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|