Padron introducing a fat cigar to Anni line

mahtofire14 · 02-29-2016, 05:49 PM

I just read about Padron coming out with a new 4 inch by 54 rg 1964 Anniversary size. Don't know about you guys but I am definitely going to like that size!

AdamJoshua · 02-29-2016, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mahtofire14

I just read about Padron coming out with a new 4 inch by 54 rg 1964 Anniversary size. Don't know about you guys but I am definitely going to like that size!

Just too too too easy....

Genetic Defect · 04-16-2016, 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamJoshua

Just too too too easy....

Sounds like my prom date

icehog3 · 02-29-2016, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mahtofire14

I just read about Padron coming out with a new 4 inch by 54 rg 1964 Anniversary size. Don't know about you guys but I am definitely going to like that size!

Sounds like the exact size (so I hear) of Ryan Suter's dingus!

mahtofire14 · 03-01-2016, 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by icehog3

Sounds like the exact size (so I hear) of Ryan Suter's dingus!

Haaaaaa!!!! I don't doubt it. What a bum.

mahtofire14 · 03-01-2016, 12:58 AM

Ok seriously. This cigar is coming out and I'm looking forward to it.

http://www.cigaraficionado.com/webfe...ary-line-18631

sigsauer · 02-29-2016, 06:51 PM

wowza......TMI!

Porch Dweller · 03-01-2016, 07:19 AM

I've never been disappointed by a Padron so I'd give it a try.

stearns · 03-01-2016, 07:36 AM

Scott gave me one of the SI-60s a few years ago, and despite my reservations he forced me to smoke it. I still remember it clearly, it was very interesting, definitely reminiscent of the smaller rg padrons but the smoke was a lot cooler and a little on the thin side. I probably won't get any of these, but I would be interested to hear how they turn out, maybe bringing the rg down a little from 60 to 54 will balance it out

mahtofire14 · 03-01-2016, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stearns

Scott gave me one of the SI-60s a few years ago, and despite my reservations he forced me to smoke it. I still remember it clearly, it was very interesting, definitely reminiscent of the smaller rg padrons but the smoke was a lot cooler and a little on the thin side. I probably won't get any of these, but I would be interested to hear how they turn out, maybe bringing the rg down a little from 60 to 54 will balance it out

I'm normally not a fan of larger ring gauges. I feel like the wrapper/filler ratio is so skewed to the filler that it cancels out the great flavors that the wrapper brings to the cigar. But the 54 gauge I'm fine with. I love the Nubs cigars (insert punch line from Adam here) so I think I'll really enjoy this.

stearns · 03-01-2016, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mahtofire14

I'm normally not a fan of larger ring gauges. I feel like the wrapper/filler ratio is so skewed to the filler that it cancels out the great flavors that the wrapper brings to the cigar. But the 54 gauge I'm fine with. I love the Nubs cigars (insert punch line from Adam here) so I think I'll really enjoy this.

Definitely post up a review if you grab any

Sooner · 03-01-2016, 10:30 AM

54 is not nearly as fat as one could go with a cigar. I would smoke one! Did the story say when this was going to come out?

mahtofire14 · 03-01-2016, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sooner

54 is not nearly as fat as one could go with a cigar. I would smoke one! Did the story say when this was going to come out?

I believe it said March so hopefully soon.

jjirons69 · 03-01-2016, 10:45 AM

I'd try it, but the larger RGs aren't my first choice.

Adriftpanda · 03-01-2016, 11:33 AM

I use to enjoy Padrons. Only problem I have with this size is that it is boxed pressed. I don't mind the 54rg because a lot of cigars are gearing towards bigger rg but to make it box pressed and that big of a rg is hard to smoke, for me at least.

Padron42 · 04-16-2016, 10:19 PM

Had a 1964 from the B&M that was about a 6.5×60 (can't remember the size's name). It was great, but I wouldn't buy another. I still prefer the smaller rg.

02-29-2016, 05:49 PM	#1
mahtofire14 Chillin in the Aging Room Join Date: Oct 2012 First Name: Pete Location: St. Paul, MN Posts: 1,588 Trading: (16)	Padron introducing a fat cigar to Anni line I just read about Padron coming out with a new 4 inch by 54 rg 1964 Anniversary size. Don't know about you guys but I am definitely going to like that size! __________________ Saving basements in the Land of 10,000 Lakes.

03-01-2016, 12:58 AM	#6
mahtofire14 Chillin in the Aging Room Join Date: Oct 2012 First Name: Pete Location: St. Paul, MN Posts: 1,588 Trading: (16)	Re: Padron introducing a fat cigar to Anni line Ok seriously. This cigar is coming out and I'm looking forward to it. http://www.cigaraficionado.com/webfe...ary-line-18631 __________________ Saving basements in the Land of 10,000 Lakes.

02-29-2016, 06:51 PM	#7
sigsauer Have My Own Room Join Date: Dec 2008 First Name: Tom Location: Pennsylvania Posts: 1,371 Trading: (63)	Re: Padron introducing a fat cigar to Anni line wowza......TMI!

03-01-2016, 07:19 AM	#8
Porch Dweller Life is for living Join Date: Oct 2012 First Name: James Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast Posts: 8,461 Trading: (24)	Re: Padron introducing a fat cigar to Anni line I've never been disappointed by a Padron so I'd give it a try. __________________ A 1911 in the hand is faster than 911 on the phone

03-01-2016, 07:36 AM	#9
stearns Dogbert Consultant Join Date: Oct 2008 First Name: Ben Location: Park Hill Posts: 5,391 Trading: (50)	Re: Padron introducing a fat cigar to Anni line Scott gave me one of the SI-60s a few years ago, and despite my reservations he forced me to smoke it. I still remember it clearly, it was very interesting, definitely reminiscent of the smaller rg padrons but the smoke was a lot cooler and a little on the thin side. I probably won't get any of these, but I would be interested to hear how they turn out, maybe bringing the rg down a little from 60 to 54 will balance it out __________________ "Ignoring all the racket of conventional reality" - Keller Williams

03-01-2016, 10:30 AM	#12
Sooner Formerly JJCigarReview Join Date: Nov 2015 First Name: Jordan Location: Iowa Posts: 139 Trading: (0)	Re: Padron introducing a fat cigar to Anni line 54 is not nearly as fat as one could go with a cigar. I would smoke one! Did the story say when this was going to come out? __________________ JJ Cigar Review is celebrating 6 months of online reviewing. Help us celebrate in our CFW cigar drive!

03-01-2016, 10:45 AM	#14
jjirons69 Haberdasher Join Date: Oct 2008 First Name: Jamie Location: Chucktown, SC Posts: 4,120 Trading: (94)	Re: Padron introducing a fat cigar to Anni line I'd try it, but the larger RGs aren't my first choice. __________________ Somebody has to go back and get a chitload of dimes

03-01-2016, 11:33 AM	#15
Adriftpanda Peter's Daddy Join Date: May 2009 First Name: Huy Location: No one wants me Posts: 10,313 Trading: (74)	Re: Padron introducing a fat cigar to Anni line I use to enjoy Padrons. Only problem I have with this size is that it is boxed pressed. I don't mind the 54rg because a lot of cigars are gearing towards bigger rg but to make it box pressed and that big of a rg is hard to smoke, for me at least. __________________ Who eats plantains when they can eat placenta.

04-16-2016, 10:19 PM	#16
Padron42 Still Watching My Back Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: North Carolina Posts: 104 Trading: (8)	Re: Padron introducing a fat cigar to Anni line Had a 1964 from the B&M that was about a 6.5×60 (can't remember the size's name). It was great, but I wouldn't buy another. I still prefer the smaller rg.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode