|
![]() |
#1 |
Postwhore
![]() |
![]()
I Need Some Advice From The "Experts", Please.
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
I'm the Dude...Man!
|
![]()
I replaced my Sony LCD projection TV with a 46" Sony LED smart TV and I love it. The picture is crystal clear and I haven't noticed any difference caused by viewing angles. I've got mine mounted above my fireplace, roughly the same distance as your TV. I got mine from Best Buy a couple of years ago and it was $900 if I recall correctly.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Postwhore
![]() |
![]()
Thanks, Steve.
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Bunion
![]() |
![]()
We replaced our first generation HD TV with a Samsung LED about 3 years ago (maybe 4). The LED has almost no glare, even under conditions that made the old TV unviewable. The much smaller depth has been greatly appreciated by the dogs, who like the room.
The new LEDs are supposed to have 20+ year life on the LEDs. The main issue that I recall being told about was back lit vs. edge lit. Gotta say that I don't know the differences well. We got ours from Best Buy and our local one has a high end TV and entertainment store inside so we talked to them. Their advice matched what others told us and the price was good, so we bought from them. Personally, if the technology has been around for more than about 18 months in quantity, I'd go with the newer technology as longevity is one of the big factors in selling TVs now, so newer should mean better long life span.
__________________
I refuse to belong to any organization that would have me as a member. ~ Groucho Marx |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Il megglior fabbro
|
![]()
As I understand it, the improvement with 4K is at present limited due to a lack of 4K content. Consider it like buying a BluRay player when there was very little offered on BluRay discs. This should of course change over time, which may be quick (within a year or three}, but at present you won't see any huge difference because there won't be much 4K out there to take advantage of that sharper resolution.
This of course does not mean that over your foreseen 10-year "lifetime" of the set you will not see a vast amount of 4K become available, and I fully expect you shall. However, keep in mind that your initial impressions might be disappointing, not due to the TV itself but due to the lack of "software" available which can take advantage of the upgrade.
__________________
Ninety percent of everything is crap - Theodore Sturgeon. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Postwhore
![]() |
![]()
Thanks, Mark & Thomas!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Bunion
![]() |
![]()
I'd say to not do it, then. The prices should come down significantly over time, just like with the LEDs. If you don't really need it, then wait for it to get cheaper. HD sports on my LED are very good.
__________________
I refuse to belong to any organization that would have me as a member. ~ Groucho Marx |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Il megglior fabbro
|
![]()
Plus, OLED sets should drop in price a lot over the next few years, and they offer a large improvement over LED or LCD in contrast . . . that is, blacks which are truly black. This doesn't help your present need, but may be a reason to make a smaller investment now while waiting to make a greater upgrade later.
Just my ![]()
__________________
Ninety percent of everything is crap - Theodore Sturgeon. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Postwhore
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Il megglior fabbro
|
![]()
Better picture? Depends on your definition. At present, the only OLED available whose price is merely "Ouch, that's a lotta bread" (as opposed to "Are you freakin' kidding me?") is the LG 55-inch curved 3-D Smart, which sells at Best Buy for $3500. It is a 1080p TV, so is not as sharp as 4K sets. But reportedly with its self-illuminating OLEDs, plus the addition of a "white" pixel to augment the standard 3 color ones, it offers an "infinite" contrast range from true black to sparkling white. The 4K is, of course, 4K-sharp, so has that advantage. I'd expect that, within a few years, we'll see 4K OLED sets of 50-inch size for around $1500, but again that does not help you today.
FYI, Best Buy is promoting OLED by showcasing these sets at thousands of stores this week. Maybe one is close enough for you to visit, and then YOU can tell US what it's like. ![]() http://www.bestbuy.com/site/home-pro...eut=2392442063
__________________
Ninety percent of everything is crap - Theodore Sturgeon. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Postwhore
![]() |
![]()
$3500 Is "Are You Freakin Kiddin' Me", Thomas!
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
I'm the Dude...Man!
|
![]()
Gotcha. We really don't watch much TV at our house, (our set will go DAYS without even being turned on) so I couldn't justify spending the coin on the 4K. Like The Poet said though, with it being such new technology you're limited on the amount of 4K content that will be available to you. I would say wait on getting the brand new stuff.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Il megglior fabbro
|
![]()
Hey, I've seen OLED prices that would get you a new car!
![]() As for Plasma, again as I understand it, the only complaint about them (aside from their high power drain) is their darkness. The picture, contrast, viewing angle, and refresh rate supposedly blows LED away, but you needed a darker room to see the screen clearly. Yet if you want a Plasma, you better get it NOW . . . it is following the dodo into extinction. Keep in mind that NONE of what I've told you is based on personal experience, and is only what I've read. At present I am watching The Caine Mutiny over boradcast TV on a 15-year-old 20-inch Toshiba CRT set hooked up to a digital converter box and rabbit-ears. ![]()
__________________
Ninety percent of everything is crap - Theodore Sturgeon. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Dear Lord, Thank You.
![]() |
![]()
Greg, I ran all over looking at tv's just a couple years ago.
I'm not about the 4k (although it wasn't available then) or the 3d, or the other "must have" gimmicky stuff. The best picture was on a Sony Bravia LED 240hz. I think it's 60", might be 55". When I say "best", it's subjective. The picture looked the best to me. It was super sharp and it doesn't ghost at all when we're watching football. (Neither do either of my old 42" Toshiba plasmas.) So many of the tv's ghosted so bad it almost gave me vertigo. ![]() The sony on sale is reasonably priced, ends up being right around Toshiba and LG and Samsung. I could not possibly be more pleased, and I picked this model based on the strength of Scott (sofaman's) tv. He had a Panasonic that fried in a couple years and he decided to go with the Bravia. After watching a few games on it, I was more than sold. My buddy UB bought one as well, and I saw it when we were down there visiting last month. It's just as gorgeous a picture as ours and Scott's. Good luck with whatever you pick, my friend!!! ![]() (I haven't turned on a tv yet, by the way. lol)
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Dear Lord, Thank You.
![]() |
![]()
I do. And a lot "sharper". Although I'm honestly thrilled with the two plasmas we have, but they are both in dark bedrooms.
I think it's cause the plasmas have that screen door pixel thing going on that makes for much blacker blacks, while the led is backlighted and always wants to be bright. So the plasma does black really good and the led does the whites really good. I think the boss is right, buddy. You should have known. ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Postwhore
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Il megglior fabbro
|
![]()
__________________
Ninety percent of everything is crap - Theodore Sturgeon. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Postwhore
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Suck It
![]() |
![]()
My first question is why don't you adapt to another port on the TV? Is it the same?
Short of your HDMI doing the same thing, there are usually at least three ways to get the signal into your TV, with the proper application of adapters. $20 versus $1500. That said, I find Samsung to be the most solid on a cost/value ratio. Sony makes about the best-LOOKING pictures, LG is a good bargain option, stay away from Viewsonic, Coby and the other price bait of course. OOPS, sorry, I see the repairman did what I thought needed to be done. Good all round. I also see that I am not the only one that loves SONY. In 32 years of television, it sinks in over time that EVERYTHING has a SONY nameplate on it in the control room, and the best thing about SONY is it works and works and works. The level of manufacturing competence is worth the extra money, I find. The pictures are good enough to trust as a reference to what your gear is doing. If the price ever comes into your wheelhouse in comparison to what you thought you might spend on a mid-tier TV, always go SONY. Last edited by OLS; 09-16-2014 at 11:52 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |