![]() |
601 White Labels
Has anyone tried these yet? If so what are your thoughts on them?
|
Re: 601 White Labels
If its not simply a repackaging of the Black, those guys are foolish. The Black was, hands down, the best Connie wrapped cigar around.
Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: 601 White Labels
Quote:
|
Re: 601 White Labels
nope but I like the blue green and la bomba!
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: 601 White Labels
I like the old black label....if this white label is the same I'll be okay with that
|
Re: 601 White Labels
Quote:
|
Re: 601 White Labels
White and black are similar but the black had more punch and the white has a cleaner finish. White labels are outstanding but blacks were legendary.
|
Re: 601 White Labels
Oh wow, I HATED the black labels. Love the reds, greens and blues are ok. The La Bombas are great. Sticking a box away to see how they are in a few months. They were selling the whites but didn't wanna risk it. :ss
|
Re: 601 White Labels
No love for the reds? When these debut'd, the reds kicked ass over the entire pack. The maduros were bland, the oscuros were mediocre at best, and the blacks were harsh as hell. Once the blacks settled down they were outstanding.
Fast forward two years and the reds were horrible. Apparently they've got the blues smoking nice now from all the buzz that's surrounds them. I have a couple but haven't had the desire to revisit them. Unless there's a huge improvement, there's nothing I want to revisit. They aren't awful, there's just nothing I wanted from the OR's, and the ship has sailed. Why they abandoned the black is beyond me, they drew rave reviews, and I even appreciated them and I hate a black pepper finish and don't care for a connecticut wrapper. FYI, Famous still has some assortment packs that have a pair of blacks nestled in there. I know how deep the love runs for those blacks, you guys might want to treat yourselves. :tu |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.