Cigar Asylum Cigar Forum

Cigar Asylum Cigar Forum (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/index.php)
-   Sports (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=57)
-   -   John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?! (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/showthread.php?t=7714)

SmokeyJoe 01-09-2009 12:50 AM

John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Never thought this day would come... :(

http://sports.aol.com/story/_a/bbdp/...l/298806?cid=6

Thanks, Smoltzy, for all you did for the Braves.

Hope he gets another Championship. :ss

PeteSB75 01-09-2009 06:25 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyJoe (Post 158653)
Never thought this day would come... :(

http://sports.aol.com/story/_a/bbdp/...l/298806?cid=6

Thanks, Smoltzy, for all you did for the Braves.

Hope he gets another Championship. :ss

I hope he does too :ss

Guessing they will be using him as a bullpen arm, and spelling Paps in closing. That will let them move Masterson back in as a starter, which they need.

md4958 01-09-2009 06:54 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
you mean the sox actually signed somebody???

its about F-ing time!!!

awsmith4 01-09-2009 07:53 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Traitor


Well at least it wasn't the Yankees :D

MikeyC 01-09-2009 08:03 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by md4958 (Post 158855)
you mean the sox actually signed somebody???

its about F-ing time!!!

We got Baldelli too. The people in RI just shat themselves with joy because he's from Woonsocket.

massphatness 01-09-2009 08:22 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
I like Smoltz, but it's a weak consolation prize after losing out on Texeira.

Mugen910 01-09-2009 08:44 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by awsmith4 (Post 158985)
Traitor


Well at least it wasn't the Yankees :D

Amen brother!!

Starscream 01-09-2009 08:48 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Not a Braves fan, but I just can't see him in another uniform. Wow.

Yazzie 01-09-2009 08:52 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by massphatness (Post 159023)
I like Smoltz, but it's a weak consolation prize after losing out on Texeira.

same exact feeling on this Vin. Ownership has clearly put away the checkbook this offseason. How can I get excited abut a 42 year Old who's arm could fall of anytime and a guy who can only play about 35% of the time due to some strange ailment :mad:

Starscream 01-09-2009 09:02 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Yazzie (Post 159099)
same exact feeling on this Vin. Ownership has clearly put away the checkbook this offseason. How can I get excited abut a 42 year Old who's arm could fall of anytime and a guy who can only play about 35% of the time due to some strange ailment :mad:

Not to knock Smoltz and his career, but why do you think Atlanta's not keeping him?;)

Kinda like Griffey and the Reds. He hit his peak w/ Seattle and we got stuck w/ the leftovers.

NCRadioMan 01-09-2009 09:16 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
I am sad about this. I am a Braves fan and Smoltzie is my all-time favorite pitcher. I hope he does well.

theycallmedan'lboone 01-09-2009 09:19 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Sad

MadAl 01-09-2009 09:34 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by massphatness (Post 159023)
I like Smoltz, but it's a weak consolation prize after losing out on Texeira.

If we got Teixiera, we'd've lost Youkilis. After that Denis Leary rant, Youk should be a Red Sox for life.

Yazzie 01-09-2009 10:01 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MadAl (Post 159184)
If we got Teixiera, we'd've lost Youkilis. After that Denis Leary rant, Youk should be a Red Sox for life.


I Disagree here. Youk would have moved back 3B his naturaL position and Lowell would have been odd man out

MadAl 01-09-2009 10:32 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Yazzie (Post 159223)
I Disagree here. Youk would have moved back 3B his naturaL position and Lowell would have been odd man out

Saw Youk interviewed when the Sox were trying to get Teixiera, he said he was the odd man out.

PeteSB75 01-09-2009 12:52 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Texiera might be a good hitter, but I don't think I'd want to give up Youk for him. It's a non-issue anyway, since he's a yankee now, but I'd take Youk over Lowell, if for no other reason than the 5 years age difference. Add in the flexibility Youk has, and he's a clear winner. You think Lowell would be able to pop over to 1st base with no problems whatsoever? Me neither.

MikeyC 01-09-2009 01:59 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Yazzie (Post 159223)
I Disagree here. Youk would have moved back 3B his naturaL position and Lowell would have been odd man out

:tpd:

The Sox have been trying to dump Lowell ever since they got him.

ScottieM 01-09-2009 02:15 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Poor Red Sox. Maybe the Yankees could even things up and sign a guy like Rollie Fingers?

MikeyC 01-09-2009 02:21 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ScottieM (Post 159645)
Poor Red Sox. Maybe the Yankees could even things up and sign a guy like Rollie Fingers?

Yeah. Bringing back old azz pitchers is a GREAT idea. How about the Sox sign Randy Johnson or maybe Roger Clemens or Mike Mussina?

Oops!! The Spankees already did that. :r

VirtualSmitty 01-09-2009 05:32 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Wow, impressive move by the Sox. They signed an old over the hill pitcher to go with their two other old over the hill pitchers and an outfielder who's always hurt :r

MikeyC 01-09-2009 08:21 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by VirtualSmitty (Post 159942)
Wow, impressive move by the Sox. They signed an old over the hill pitcher to go with their two other old over the hill pitchers and an outfielder who's always hurt :r

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeyC (Post 159651)
Yeah. Bringing back old azz pitchers is a GREAT idea. How about the Sox sign Randy Johnson or maybe Roger Clemens or Mike Mussina?

Oops!! The Spankees already did that. :r

We're just taking a page out of the Yankees play book I guess. :ss

The difference is that they are filling out a bullpen that already includes TWO great YOUNG starting pitchers and THE BEST closer in ALL of baseball.

shvictor 01-09-2009 09:09 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
I'm gonna cry :(

VirtualSmitty 01-09-2009 11:00 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeyC (Post 160219)
The difference is that they are filling out a bullpen that already includes TWO great YOUNG starting pitchers and THE BEST closer in ALL of baseball.

The Sox don't have Rivera ;)

I guess they needed to do something now that the Yanks have four of the best young arms in baseball :r

SMW 01-09-2009 11:09 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shvictor (Post 160280)
I'm gonna cry :(

I was in shock when I heard it yesterday. Now I bet wren and co overpay for lowe. But we have the money and we need a #1 starter.

Bruzee 01-10-2009 01:47 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
This has to be one of the sadest headlines I've read on ESPN. It is right there with Glavine signing with the Mets a few years back. I grew up watching both of them play at Fulton Co Stadium. This absolutely breaks my heart, and I would have loved to see him retire a Brave. Shame on you Atlanta for not paying this guy, despite the age and injuries. This never would have happened if John was still the GM. :fl:bh:confused::(:sad

MikeyC 01-10-2009 05:42 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by VirtualSmitty (Post 160423)
The Sox don't have Rivera ;)

I guess they needed to do something now that the Yanks have four of the best young arms in baseball :r

You're making me laugh. :r

Rivera is SO over the hill. He's about as scary as a little girl in a ballerina costume at this point in his career. Always remember, it's not important how you start. Only how you finish the game.

The Red Sox have PLENTY of young pitching. I just think they have 2 or 3 of the BEST young pitchers. The Spankees do have four young pitchers on their roster I'll give you that. :D

VirtualSmitty 01-10-2009 10:38 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeyC (Post 160576)
You're making me laugh. :r

Rivera is SO over the hill. He's about as scary as a little girl in a ballerina costume at this point in his career. Always remember, it's not important how you start. Only how you finish the game.

The Red Sox have PLENTY of young pitching. I just think they have 2 or 3 of the BEST young pitchers. The Spankees do have four young pitchers on their roster I'll give you that. :D

Actually your making me laugh. Did you look at Rivera's numbers last season? A 1.40 ERA with 39 saves is hardly over the hill. Rivera also pitched more innings, walked less, and hd the same amount os SOs as Papelbon. Papelbon had two more saves but he also had a much higher era ;) Rivera>Papelbon, sorry.

I'm sure the Blow Sux have a good young pitcher or two. The problem is the yanks have four of the best young arms in the rotation now and some great young arms in the pen. And the best closer in the game :tu

But all is not lost. The Sux did just make a great signing. Brad Penny is sure to be lights out for you. I mean, he was great a couple of years ago. And last year, man was he impressive. 6 wins and 9 losses in the worst division in baseball with and ERA over 6. And now he's making a move to the Al, where he's never played, and moving from the worst division to the best division in baseball. Fantastic free agent signing :r

SMW 01-10-2009 11:55 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruzee (Post 160492)
This has to be one of the sadest headlines I've read on ESPN. It is right there with Glavine signing with the Mets a few years back. I grew up watching both of them play at Fulton Co Stadium. This absolutely breaks my heart, and I would have loved to see him retire a Brave. Shame on you Atlanta for not paying this guy, despite the age and injuries. This never would have happened if John was still the GM. :fl:bh:confused::(:sad

It is sad, isn't it? I actually think it's far worse than the Glavine situation (even though he did go to a division rival). The thing I don't understand, is that we have so much money to spend this offseason, but yet we don't open up the vault for Mr. Braves? Honestly, Smoltz was an icon not only in Atlanta, but in all of the Majors. I have a tendancy to agree with you that if John Schuerholz were still the GM, this wouldn't have happened.

And speaking of the GM situation, what a tough offseason for Wren. I loved the Renteria trade (back in 07) that yielded us Jair and Gorkys but losing out on Peavy, Smoltz, Burnett and Furcal (all within a few months) is pretty inexcusable. Now I'm fairly confident that we'll overpay for D. Lowe (because we need a legit #1 starter) and probably sign Andruw Jones back. It's going to be an interesting (and realisticly underwhelming) season in Atlanta.

Starscream 01-10-2009 01:12 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SMW (Post 161095)
It is sad, isn't it? I actually think it's far worse than the Glavine situation (even though he did go to a division rival).

I remember the old Braves pitching dynasty: Smoltz, Glavine, and Maddux. They're all gone now. I hated to see Maddux's lackluster retirement.

MikeyC 01-10-2009 01:16 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by VirtualSmitty (Post 160960)
Actually your making me laugh. Did you look at Rivera's numbers last season? A 1.40 ERA with 39 saves is hardly over the hill. Rivera also pitched more innings, walked less, and hd the same amount os SOs as Papelbon. Papelbon had two more saves but he also had a much higher era ;) Rivera>Papelbon, sorry.

I'm sure the Blow Sux have a good young pitcher or two. The problem is the yanks have four of the best young arms in the rotation now and some great young arms in the pen. And the best closer in the game :tu

But all is not lost. The Sux did just make a great signing. Brad Penny is sure to be lights out for you. I mean, he was great a couple of years ago. And last year, man was he impressive. 6 wins and 9 losses in the worst division in baseball with and ERA over 6. And now he's making a move to the Al, where he's never played, and moving from the worst division to the best division in baseball. Fantastic free agent signing :r

If you REALLY want to laugh, listen to your buddy Joba talk. Dice-K speaks english better than he does and he's Japanese. :r

VirtualSmitty 01-10-2009 03:17 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeyC (Post 161231)
If you REALLY want to laugh, listen to your buddy Joba talk. Dice-K speaks english better than he does and he's Japanese. :r

If you really want a good laugh look at Chamberlain pitch, then look at Dice-k. Then look at how much more the Blow Sox are paying him :r

Bruzee 01-10-2009 06:17 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SMW (Post 161095)
It is sad, isn't it? I actually think it's far worse than the Glavine situation (even though he did go to a division rival). The thing I don't understand, is that we have so much money to spend this offseason, but yet we don't open up the vault for Mr. Braves? Honestly, Smoltz was an icon not only in Atlanta, but in all of the Majors. I have a tendancy to agree with you that if John Schuerholz were still the GM, this wouldn't have happened.

And speaking of the GM situation, what a tough offseason for Wren. I loved the Renteria trade (back in 07) that yielded us Jair and Gorkys but losing out on Peavy, Smoltz, Burnett and Furcal (all within a few months) is pretty inexcusable. Now I'm fairly confident that we'll overpay for D. Lowe (because we need a legit #1 starter) and probably sign Andruw Jones back. It's going to be an interesting (and realisticly underwhelming) season in Atlanta.

I am still stunned. Smoltzy deserved to spend his entire career in Atlanta. You are absolutely right about Wren. He has seriously hurt our chances at a winning season. The Mets are only getting stronger (although they are choke artists). And the Phills are for real. I will be a Brave fan till I die, but this is going to be another tough year!

Quote:

Originally Posted by andysutherland (Post 161224)
I remember the old Braves pitching dynasty: Smoltz, Glavine, and Maddux. They're all gone now. I hated to see Maddux's lackluster retirement.

I remember too. Then I gues you'll remember when we all considered Steve Avery one of the 4 aces too! Good days, and great memories!

ScottieM 01-10-2009 08:27 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Now I hear the Sox just signed Saito. Looks like the Sox are Dredging the bottom of the old Free Agent Pool this yr. This "Young team" is getting older real fast. Who's next? Jamie Moyer.:r

Yazzie 01-10-2009 08:50 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Look for all you Yankee fans out there. I'm sure your glad your owner has spent like a pig and opened up the pursestrings for you but the reality is WE the Red Sox own scoreboard right now with 2 WS Championships the past 4 years...

I hope all the money you have spent allows you to at least make the playoffs in 2009.

Certainly you are the favorites on paper right? Arod are you going to finally step up?

SMW 01-10-2009 11:21 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by andysutherland (Post 161224)
I remember the old Braves pitching dynasty: Smoltz, Glavine, and Maddux. They're all gone now. I hated to see Maddux's lackluster retirement.

Weren't those the days? And what offense we had too. I'm not going to lie, I was always a bigtime Prime Time fan. Deion Sanders was a great football player, baseball player and musician (YouTube 'Must Be The Money' for reference). But I too was disappointed by the Maddux retirement. For such a great pitcher, his departure didn't get much fanfare. It would have been pretty great to see Maddux, Glavine, and Smoltz all pitch for the Braves this year. Seemed like it was a pretty simple deal, and now it looks like we might not even have any of them.

SmokeyJoe 06-26-2009 09:29 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Smoltzie had a rough outing against the hapless Nationals.

Hopefully just a little rust. Go get them, JS!!! :ss

kelmac07 06-27-2009 06:13 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SMW (Post 162057)
Weren't those the days? And what offense we had too. I'm not going to lie, I was always a bigtime Prime Time fan. Deion Sanders was a great football player, baseball player and musician (YouTube 'Must Be The Money' for reference). But I too was disappointed by the Maddux retirement. For such a great pitcher, his departure didn't get much fanfare. It would have been pretty great to see Maddux, Glavine, and Smoltz all pitch for the Braves this year. Seemed like it was a pretty simple deal, and now it looks like we might not even have any of them.

After all those years of the Braves dominating my beloved mets...I am smiling as Smoltz gets ROCKED!!!

The Poet 06-27-2009 10:42 AM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
You Massholes seem to be missing the point here - the Sox did NOT get Smoltz for his arm, but for his bat. He's slotted to PH for Big Poopie.

taltos 06-27-2009 01:39 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyJoe (Post 442217)
Smoltzie had a rough outing against the hapless Nationals.

Hopefully just a little rust. Go get them, JS!!! :ss

He was most excellent after the first inning.:D

Texan in Mexico 06-27-2009 01:51 PM

Re: John Smoltz - playing for the Red Sox?!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by taltos (Post 442753)
He was most excellent after the first inning.:D

I agree, take away that inning and he had a fine line score striking out the side in the fifth I thnk.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.