Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

I've discovered that I prefer smaller ring gauge cigars. My ideal size is the classic corona and I have been enjoying some lanceros recently. They just seem to burn more evenly and have a better feel in the hand. I've started buying smaller ring gauge versions of cigars that I like, and it's too soon to draw any firm conclusions, but it seems so far that cutting the RG might also cut a little bit of the complexity from the flavor profile, perhaps because the blenders can't use as many varieties of filler leaves in the smaller RGs? I don't know if there is anything to this, and I still prefer smaller RGs regardless, but just curious what others' experiences are. To be sure, there are coronas and smaller RGs that are insanely full bodied, like the Ilusione MK Corona, one of my personal favorites. But I'm just wondering if, on average, smaller RGs might be ever so slightly less complex than the larger RGs. Has anyone tried a favorite blend in a corona or smaller RG and the same blend in a robusto or larger RG? Do you notice a slightly less complex profile in the smaller RG? It might just be the particular blends I've tried (Padron 2000 v. Londres, Oliva V Torpedo v. Lancero).

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

I would say it depends on the blend. I usually prefer a lancero and find them typically to be more nuanced in their flavors but not less complex. The thinner ring gauge allows the wrapper leaf to be more pronounced in the flavor as well. If you are heading the thin direction, might I suggest the Tatuaje Especiales or Daruma Mutante. Two of my personal lancero favorites that are fairly easy to get a hold of.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

Thanks. I'll check those out. Definitely digging lanceros these days.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

The few that I had opportunity to try in different vitolas have always been less complex in a corona. But the wrapper is always on the forefront of the flavor profile in my experience. Sometimes it was a good thing. But the coronas have been somewhat one dimensional and the larger rings mostly boring. I usually know what to expect for the most part. I've had both coronas and larger sizes draw horribly when well rested. I prefer a robusto size especially in a 5.5" length, sometimes even toros. For the ones I enjoy they always satisfy. I do have my favorites in corona too. I never hesitate to try anything smaller than a sixty if its something I already like.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

I have actually experienced more flavor complexity in some of the smaller ring gauge cigars...Punch Ninfas, ERdM Panatela Largas, Montecristo Especiales, Partagas Serie Connoisseur and Charlottes, and La Gloria Medaille d'Or No.4 are a few that come right to mind....but I also agree with Matt that a lot depends on the individual blend.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

I'm with the Hog on this one. When I smoke smaller ring gauge sticks, the flavors are a lot more pronounced. I've only experienced this in the last year or so. :2

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

agree... this is the reason I prefer the Corona Vitola

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

There's less (or none) volado leaf in thinner ring gauge cigars and volado is used as filler to make combustion. The leaf itself does not have much flavor.

Typically bigger ring gauge (and long) cigars aren't supposed to be a heavy full flavored as they are be being smoked for hours.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

I'm with Tom and Mac on this one. I believe the smaller Ring Guages have much more / better flavor that the larger. I prefer anything smaller that 46, even better is 42 or smaller. IMO.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

Interesting. I always wondered how they could maintain the same/similar flavor profile in such drastically different RG cigars of the same blend. That makes sense.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

It's the wrapper.The ratio of wrapper to filler is greater in a smaller stick.also the makers use less of the neutral leaf that is needed to make a larger cigar.

Is there an older thread on this?

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

I can say that generally speaking, I am able to identify more flavors out of smaller RG cigars vs. larger ones. I think the blend has a lot to do with this, because there is an intended ratio of filler-binder-wrapper with all blends. I think that once you get into RGs much larger than 50, the filler ratio gets higher and can start to mute some of the wrapper/binder flavors. It is fun to smoke different sizes of the same blend and see which size is your favorite.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

If you are used to smoking large ring gauges then switching to a smaller ring gauge requires a change in how you smoke -- at least it did for me.

Smaller ring gauge cigars require slower eaiser puffs, otherwise the cigar will overheat. If you slow down and ease up on the draw you might find the smaller ring gauges to be more flaverful.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

This. Over the last year or so I've transitioned from smoking toros and robustos almost exclusively to preferring coronas and robustos. Smoking a 46rg when used to a 60 takes a change in how you smoke, otherwise you'll turn every smoke into a hot, bitter disappointment.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

the most complex cigars I have ... bolivar coronas juniors ... don't get much smaller than this.

regardless of ratio of filler binder ligero etc etc ... true complexity like true strength ... only comes with time. most (Cuban) cigars don't reach peak strength for 10 years or more. lots of (Cuban) cigars don't become truly complex for 2 decades.

final thought...most people don't smoke their "epiphany" cigar...until they try their first 20 or 25 year old Cuban cigar.

trying hard not to sound snooty
derrek

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

Derrek knows his stuff ^

whatever he says, I agree.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

For those that know Derrek, no explanation is needed.

For those that don't, he is as far from snooty as one can get. One of the most humble and unassuming people I know. And very knowledgeable about Cuban cigars.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

The most complex cigars I have smoked and blended were in the 40-46RG area, its all about the leaf used and how its blended. Large RG's to me actually produce less complexity and more dominance of a single flavor profile, smaller RG's allow you to experience the wrapper, binder, and filler in harmony.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

Looking forward to trying one someday.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

:2My two cents and I have not smoked a 20+ year old Cuban cigar but I drool with anticipation :)

I believe most blenders target an optimal size for a blend and the size varies. Illusione blends are initially designed around the corona size so it's "optimized". Then the other sizes are tweaked usually by adding more filler which I believe why large ring gauge cigars taste washed out and bland. In the last few years 60 RG cigars became vogue so new blends are optimized around the larger ring gauge and the smaller RG in the newer cigars may appear lacking.

The best advice I could offer is try various sizes in the brand and see which size appeals to you more.

My tastes enjoy the corona sizes from Illusione, Toros from Don Pepin blends and Viaje. I would love to hear others as they weigh in? I will never claim I have a good palate so take what I say as just my two cents :2

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

I agree with you on that one, Dave. I enjoy both the Kristoff Maduro and My Father blends in the robusto and toro size so I thought the lanceros would be even better...not the case at all. I was let down by both. Not bad cigars by any means, just not what I thought they would be and overall less complex than their thicker RG counterparts.

Still waiting to try that 20+ yo cc as well here, though I will say that one of my all time favorites was the '02 LGC MdO 3 that jjirons gifted me while golfing a few years ago. Great cigar and without a doubt the skinniest thing I've ever smoked.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

My preference has been 38-46 ring for many, many years. Probably 75% of the smokes I burn fall in this range. I wish this new trend toward jaw-breakers would reverse, as some of the cigars I would like to try do not offer smaller vitolas.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

^Exactly my sentiments regarding the jaw-breaker trend. But I think most here would agree with that as well.

I also don't try a new marca if the vitolas aren't to my liking.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

Agreed 100%. I smoke the occasional robusto or torpedo/belicoso up to a 52, but overwhelmingly prefer less than 50 RG.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

Yep. I used to only smoke churchills. 7x50+

Now im going more and more into smaller RG. 38-48 ish.

Required a big change in how I smoke. And I typically smoke much slower than most people. Robustos typically take me 20-25 mins longer than most people.

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

Holts has a Wednesday special on Pepin made petit coronas today...

Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?
 

Honestly, it depends on the blend...a cigar with an excellent wrapper is going to taste better in a smaller RG in general, as opposed to a cigar with a wrapper that is not as good, which might taste better in a large RG, since there is more room in the cigar to fill with other tobacco.