Cigar Asylum Cigar Forum

Cigar Asylum Cigar Forum (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/index.php)
-   Sports (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=57)
-   -   2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/showthread.php?t=59460)

jonumberone 11-29-2012 09:11 AM

2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
In what is for sure to be one of the most controversial votes in a long time, The BBWAA released the 2013 ballot for the MLB HOF.

Here is the new Hall of Fame ballot. For holdovers, numbers refer to previous year's votes, percentage of ballots and years on ballot.

Sandy Alomar Jr.
Jeff Bagwell 321, 56.0%, 2
Craig Biggio
Barry Bonds
Jeff Cirillo
Royce Clayton
Roger Clemens
Jeff Conine
Steve Finley
Julio Franco
Shawn Green
Roberto Hernandez
Ryan Klesko
Kenny Lofton
Edgar Martinez 209, 36.5%, 3
Don Mattingly 102, 17.8%, 12
Fred McGriff 137, 23.9%, 3
Mark McGwire 112, 19.5%, 6
Jose Mesa
Jack Morris 382, 66.7%, 13
Dale Murphy 83, 14.5%, 14
Rafael Palmeiro 72, 12.6%, 2
Mike Piazza
Tim Raines 279, 48.7%, 5
Reggie Sanders
Curt Schilling
Aaron Sele
Lee Smith 290, 50.6%, 10
Sammy Sosa
Mike Stanton
Alan Trammell 211, 36.8%, 11
Larry Walker 131, 22.9%, 2
Todd Walker
David Wells
Rondell White
Bernie Williams 55, 9.6%, 1
Woody Williams

Thoughts?
Who gets in? Who doesn't?
Do Clemens, Bonds, Sosa, and the like ever see the hall?

Discuss!

pnoon 11-29-2012 09:17 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
My choices are as follows:

Don Mattingly
Tim Raines
Lee Smith
Alan Trammell
Larry Walker

Some of the names even under consideration are comical.

"Do Clemens, Bonds, Sosa, and the like ever see the hall?
IMO, No - for the obvious reasons. But set those reasons/criteria aside and they are no-brainers.

shilala 11-29-2012 09:45 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
I'm excited to see what happens.
Personally, I think the Writer's couldn't possibly care about the "steroid era".
Reason being, they're educated. Ball players have always juiced and always will. Anything to give them an edge. They know how many Hall of Famers there are that used substances to help their game. That's how I think on where the bulk of the writer's personal mindset lies.

That said, they'll likely use this first ballot to test the waters. Don't vote for Bonds and Clemens and see where the public response lies. Their first loyalty is to political correctness, of course. They pander to the public and write what will keep the paychecks coming rather than what they necessarily think is true or right. I can't imagine for a minute they'll stick their necks out, enshrine a couple bobbleheads, then cross their fingers that public opinion doesn't execute them. Imagine for a minute what would be in the newspapers and on ESPN? "Baseball Writers Want Your Kids To Use Steroids!!!"

After we see the fallout from the obvious roid users not being enshrined, we should all have a good idea where this is headed. I think it's headed toward them being enshrined, but baseball is steeped in a tradition of being obstinate, so there's that.
If there's one indicator I can point to that guages public sentiment on roids, it's Lance Armstrong. He just got stripped of his titles, was juicing, blah, blah, blah. The public outcry was zero. I love Lance, everybody loves Lance. Nobody cares and everyone thinks what happened was ridiculous. We still love Lance, he's a good dude, and he's badass.
Bonds and Clemens are not good dudes, they're the opposite. If anything, it's their personalities that will make it easy not to accept them. Let's see what happens with Sammy after this year. :tu

Islayphile 11-29-2012 10:00 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Fred McGriff belongs in the HOF

2490 Hits

441 2B

24 3B

493 HR

1550 RBI

.284 BA

Gophernut 11-29-2012 10:03 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonumberone (Post 1756710)
Do Clemens, Bonds, Sosa, and the like ever see the hall?
Discuss!

I hope not, as Peter said, no for the obvious reasons. They have hof numbers, but how did they get to them?

Of the remaining players on the ballot, I would really like to see Jack Morris get in. One of the most dominant pitchers of his era. He also had one of the best, if the not THE best, pitching performances in game 7 of the 1991 World Series.

Blak Smyth 11-29-2012 10:14 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Don Mattingly



Surprised this hasn't happened yet.
I am unknowledgeable on many of these players listed.

forgop 11-29-2012 10:15 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Too bad Clemens wasn't able to pitch to get a 5 year extension like he hoped.

mkarnold1 11-29-2012 10:18 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gophernut (Post 1756749)
Of the remaining players on the ballot, I would really like to see Jack Morris get in. One of the most dominant pitchers of his era. He also had one of the best, if the not THE best, pitching performances in game 7 of the 1991 World Series.

:tpd:, It is shocking to see Don Mattingly with such a low percentage after 12 years. At this point is seems unlikely that he gets in.

STEVE S 11-29-2012 10:33 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
I would love to see Don Mattingly, finally get voted in.

kelmac07 11-29-2012 11:35 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
:wo :wo Kenny Lofton on the ballot...he doesn't have the numbers to support an induction, but he gets my vote.

icehog3 11-29-2012 11:35 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shilala (Post 1756738)
Personally, I think the Writer's couldn't possibly care about the "steroid era".
Reason being, they're educated. Ball players have always juiced and always will. Anything to give them an edge. They know how many Hall of Famers there are that used substances to help their game. That's how I think on where the bulk of the writer's personal mindset lies.

I am not sure, Scott....how do you explain 6 years of Mark McGwire? He wasn't even accused of using true anabolics, just prohormoes. Maybe the writers just don't like the guy?

mahtofire14 11-29-2012 12:49 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
I think it's a huge deal to the writers. They are all purists. They hold these players to such a standard that when a known steroid user makes it on the ballot they are pretty much offended by them, and rarely vote for them.

I say Lee Smith and Larry Walker get in.

The Poet 11-29-2012 02:27 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pnoon (Post 1756719)
My choices are as follows:
Don Mattingly

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blak Smyth (Post 1756750)
Don Mattingly

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkarnold1 (Post 1756753)
:tpd:, It is shocking to see Don Mattingly with such a low percentage after 12 years. At this point is seems unlikely that he gets in.

Quote:

Originally Posted by STEVE S (Post 1756762)
I would love to see Don Mattingly, finally get voted in.


I love Donnie Baseball. He's not only a major reason I'm a baseball fan now, he's the SOLE (soul??) reason I became a Yankee fan. I would love to see him get voted into the Hall.

I don't see it happening, however, unless he makes it as a manager twenty years from now.

dave 11-29-2012 03:25 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Didn't read responses after OP so as not to affect my list:

Barry Bonds
Roger Clemens
Don Mattingly
The only three that jump out at me. No fan of the first two, but seems to me that cheaters or not, I put them in. I can't plink and plunk individuals out of an entire era. Some didn't cheat, but I believe that most did.
I admit, though, that I gave up on baseball in the 94 strike and never looked back. So, I'm no longer a fan and certainly not knowledgeable enough to entrust with a vote.

jonumberone 12-01-2012 06:31 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
I thought there would more discussion on this, actually I thought there would be much more vitriol aimed at the steroids players.

My ballot would look like this:

Craig Biggio
Don Mattingly
Jack Morris
Tim Raines

I think in time some of the steroids players will get in.
IMO, Bonds and Clemens are hall of famer's without steroids.
Sosa, Palmeiro and Mcgwire are a product of steroids.
That's how I see it anyways.

shilala 12-01-2012 08:37 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by icehog3 (Post 1756798)
I am not sure, Scott....how do you explain 6 years of Mark McGwire? He wasn't even accused of using true anabolics, just prohormoes. Maybe the writers just don't like the guy?

I sure don't have the answer, Tom. I have a number of guesses, is all. Even those are conflicting. :)
McGwire is a good dude and I'd vote for him in a heartbeat. His play alone might not get it, but what he's done in the community and the way he handled the steroid allegations are a positive to me.
I think he's fallen in the "nobody is going to stick their neck out" category because his play makes it easy and he's stood alone. With Bonds and Clemens (and other great steroid players coming up for election) that's going to be tougher because their play has always been excellent. Add to that the swaying of public sentiment as I see it, and a juicer might get inducted.

I don't think people make a distinction between anabolics and prohormones, specifically. Probably because they don't know the difference. At least I don't. I'm not sure if the distinction helps McGwire at all.
That makes me think to this point...
Players have used everything from amphetamines to cocaine to painkillers to booze to steroids to the drug du jour, Adderall, to get an edge. It's all the same to me and I can see why they'd do it. For some it's ego, some are trying to keep their job, some want to heal, some want to manage pain to play.

I'm as interested as anyone to see this play out. I'm hoping that the media has overdone the whole thing to death and it's made people not really care, or at least made them see that steroids do not make for a superman baseball player. Talent and practice does. Steroids just make a guy a bit more powerful, but so do a couple Vicodin when a guy has a sprained ankle.

icehog3 12-01-2012 09:37 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Scott, lots of good sense there.

For the record, anabolic steroids are illegal without a prescription, whereas prohormones are legal to sell, just not allowed for use by MLB. (I should say, legal at the time of sale, they are often made illegal after some time on the market, and usually make one small change and reappear again, legallly, with a new formula).

The Poet 12-01-2012 12:01 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
If we're talking legality, it behooves us to define it in baseball terms as well as purely legal ones. The careers of those either accused or confessed users of PEDs occurred during a period where their use was frowned upon and condemned by MLB, and was considered "cheating" by the fans, but when it WAS NOT SPECIFICALLY BANNED BY BASEBALL RULES. That may seem nit-picking, but it does proffer the excuse (valid or not) that a player cannot be banned from the HoF for cheating if he did not actually break the rules.

I'm not saying I want guys like Bonds, Sosa, Clemens, etc. in the Hall, or even that I'd have no problem were they elected. Still, I need confess I'd have no "legal" leg to stand upon, so could not logically justify a complaint.

mahtofire14 12-01-2012 12:41 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
I would go with

Bagwell
Biggio
Jack Morris
Lee Smith

Morris deserves it. Pitched one of the best pitching performance in baseball history, in the most important game of the year. Also has the career stats.

icehog3 12-01-2012 04:23 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poet (Post 1757926)
If we're talking legality, it behooves us to define it in baseball terms as well as purely legal ones. The careers of those either accused or confessed users of PEDs occurred during a period where their use was frowned upon and condemned by MLB, and was considered "cheating" by the fans, but when it WAS NOT SPECIFICALLY BANNED BY BASEBALL RULES. That may seem nit-picking, but it does proffer the excuse (valid or not) that a player cannot be banned from the HoF for cheating if he did not actually break the rules.

Absolutely true in the case of Mark McGwire and the substance androstenedione.

Stephen 12-01-2012 04:52 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Omitting Clemens and Bonds (who to me are first ballot HOF guys) the only two I would vote for would be Biggio and Piazza.

Gophernut 12-01-2012 05:22 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Saw on the ESPN crawl, that a preliminary count of votes showed that Bonds, Clemens, and Sosa did not get in.

bvilchez 12-01-2012 07:06 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
The unfortunate part of those steroid users on the current list is that I believe, IMO, that without the substances they took they still would have been extraordinary players. I don't know if they would have been putting up numbers like they did but their performance would have still been superb enough to get them inducted.

icehog3 12-01-2012 07:36 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bvilchez (Post 1758057)
The unfortunate part of those steroid users on the current list is that I believe, IMO, that without the substances they took they still would have been extraordinary players. I don't know if they would have been putting up numbers like they did but their performance would have still been superb enough to get them inducted.

Agreed, Jay,

mase 12-01-2012 08:28 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Surprised no one mentioned Piazza. Greatest offensive catcher ever. I think he makes it.

icehog3 12-01-2012 10:01 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 1758002)
Omitting Clemens and Bonds (who to me are first ballot HOF guys) the only two I would vote for would be Biggio and Piazza.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mase (Post 1758104)
Surprised no one mentioned Piazza. Greatest offensive catcher ever. I think he makes it.

http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/a...hog3/doh-1.jpg

dozer 12-04-2012 11:27 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
I'd be surprised if Bagwell didn't juice, yet he will most likely get in at some point. I just don't see how you can keep Bonds out when there will be users that eventually slide through.

Stephen 12-05-2012 09:02 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dozer (Post 1759614)
I'd be surprised if Bagwell didn't juice, yet he will most likely get in at some point. I just don't see how you can keep Bonds out when there will be users that eventually slide through.

Yep. Completely stupid. Ditto for Clemens. The best pitcher and the best everyday player from this generation and neither one will be in the HOF (anytime soon at least) because of speculation.

The Poet 12-05-2012 12:58 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mase (Post 1758104)
Surprised no one mentioned Piazza. Greatest offensive catcher ever.

And possibly the worst defensive catcher ever too, so there's that also. :tu



:D

dozer 12-05-2012 11:17 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Despite his shortcomings defensively, Piazza deserves to be in...I am still holding out for Edgar as a dh...

jonumberone 01-08-2013 06:28 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
The ballot results will be announced tomorrow @ 2PM ET

Gophernut 01-09-2013 12:03 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonumberone (Post 1777819)
The ballot results will be announced tomorrow @ 2PM ET

Nobody gets in. Interesting.

kelmac07 01-09-2013 12:09 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Come on now...not one person?? I guess the writers are holding everyone that played in the "sterioid era" hostage. I, for one, completely disagree with this decision. BOOOO!!!

Gophernut 01-09-2013 12:13 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
I agree Mac, I thought that Biggio, Piazza, and Morris should have gotten in.

E.J. 01-09-2013 01:56 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Not surprised & not even sure I am disappointed. It will be interesting to see if the big names get in later. There is something to be said for being a first ballot guy and you knew because of their history, they weren't going to be FBG's.

I thought Biggio may slide in.

Next year they'll get some 1st ballot guys.....

E.J. 01-09-2013 02:02 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Those mentioning Piazza, I had always assumed he was a juicer....and don't think I'm alone. Though he isn't Bonds, Mac, Sosa, Clemens et. al., I think he gets lumped in with the PED guys.

jonumberone 01-09-2013 05:55 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Interesting results, indeed.
The writers set out to send a message.
I'm not really sure how I feel about this.
One thing is for certain, I am starting to dislike these writers (not just in baseball) who vote.
They use "integrity of the game" as the main reason to keep guys out!
Then they use these ballots to settle grudges and personal vendettas.
Where's the integrity in that? :confused:


Quote:

The BBWAA election rules say: "Voting shall be based upon the player's record, playing ability, integrity, sportsmanship, character, and contributions to the team(s) on which the player played."

icehog3 01-09-2013 07:20 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonumberone (Post 1778751)
They use "integrity of the game" as the main reason to keep guys out!
Then they use these ballots to settle grudges and personal vendettas.
Where's the integrity in that? :confused:

Couldn't agree with you more, Dom. :tu

VirtualSmitty 01-10-2013 05:18 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Craig Biggio
Don Mattingly
Bernie Wiliams

Stephen 01-10-2013 07:10 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
I couldn't have said it any better myself...

icehog3 01-10-2013 07:58 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 1779016)

Interesting read, thanks Stephen. :tu

pnoon 01-10-2013 09:00 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Nobody got in?!?!?!

They could have at least given Ray Lewis the Humanitarian Award.
:=:
















;s
I know. I'm sad and pathetic.

Stephen 01-10-2013 09:46 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pnoon (Post 1779073)
Nobody got in?!?!?!

They could have at least given Ray Lewis the Humanitarian Award.
:=:

Ray Lewis would kill to get into the Hall of Fame. :rd

STEVE S 01-10-2013 10:49 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
I guess the list was so controversial that the voters (writers), couldn't even get one person voted in. How sad is that?? :sh

icehog3 01-10-2013 11:25 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pnoon (Post 1779073)
Nobody got in?!?!?!

They could have at least given Ray Lewis the Humanitarian Award.
:=:

;s
I know. I'm sad and pathetic.

Not to mention rude and unattractive. ;)

icehog3 01-10-2013 11:26 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/88...clemens-denied

OLS 01-10-2013 11:33 AM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Actually they should have voted the entire steroid class in at one time, rigged the balloting and all to do it,
then erected a special room JUST for them...a closet of sorts. That way if everybody would play clean,
we could just move on. But what would I care, baseball escapes me.

Stephen 01-10-2013 01:46 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by icehog3 (Post 1779176)

Gossage and Eckersley piping up about this is irony at its finest.

Stephen 01-10-2013 01:53 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLS (Post 1779177)
Actually they should have voted the entire steroid class in at one time, rigged the balloting and all to do it,
then erected a special room JUST for them...a closet of sorts. That way if everybody would play clean,
we could just move on. But what would I care, baseball escapes me.

Do we also get a, "greenies" wing, a, "doctored the ball" wing, and a, "played prior to segregation" wing, too? It's a museum, not a choir loft.

icehog3 01-10-2013 02:02 PM

Re: 2013 MLB Hall of Fame ballot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 1779266)
Gossage and Eckersley piping up about this is irony at its finest.

Backround, please....What were Eckersley and Gossage's "vices"? :)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.