![]() |
Famous Nic 3000
I was pleasantly surprised to see that Famous Nic 3000's are in stock. Can't wait to try another.
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Is there any confirmation that the current nic 3000 are the same blend as the ones from a few years ago?
Scott |
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Quote:
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Never had "old" ones. I can confidently say that the current ones are easily the best bundle cigar I've smoked and in my top 5 at any price, period.
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Quote:
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Great bundled smoke. Don't listen to Mean Darrell when he shows up and tells you they suck. :p
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
I bought a bundle of them. King Kong size. Resting for a while
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Bought two of those King Kong Bundles myself, they are RIP till warm weather. Bought some a couple of years ago and they were very good bundle smokes after some age, hope these new ones meet the same standard.
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
I'm also curious about this new batch. Anybody want to do a trade for a 5-pack from this new batch? PM me. Thanks.
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Quote:
Anyway, on to the nic 3000.. The ones I refer to didn't have ANY band at all. Scott |
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Quote:
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Quote:
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
I always hear great things about these and they are frequently out of stock but do they ever run specials on the FN 3000?
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Quote:
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Quote:
But at just a hair over $2/cigar, they're very much worth the price. They can easily hold their own against cigars costing 2 to 3 times as much. It's probably the only reason why I even bother with Famous Smoke anymore. On a side note: They do seem to have a higher percentage of burn issues than other cigars I smoke. Out of about 2 bundles, I think the majority of them had some skewing of the burn at some point or another (and them being semi-box pressed makes it harder to correct the burn by just rotating them on the ashtray). |
Re: Famous Nic 3000
I smoke A LOT of these, and IMO they have managed to maintain a very good consistency in the line, even between the different sizes.
They do tend to burn funny. Not bad, just kinda crooked. I've never had one tunnel on me though, or even canoe too badly. I say it in every Nic 3000 thread I post in: Probably my favorite NC, and one of my favorite cigars period. :ss |
Re: Famous Nic 3000
I bought a bundle a month or so ago, resting peacefully until spring. Love 'em.
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Quote:
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Quote:
Quote:
These new ones (with the green bands), are still very good. They are about 90% as good as the originals. And with a little aging (3-6 months) bump up a bit closer. |
Re: Famous Nic 3000
I have heard that the blend has changed more than once. And when you think about it, how couldn't it have? In any event after smoking the original band-less version and subsequent versions I believe there is a difference. That being said they are a decent stick at a great price BUT IMO they are more a hype stick at this point than anything else. If they really stood up to $6 sticks on a consistent basis someone would put a band or two on them and charge six bucks...
I am not hating on value smokes or bundle smokes at all, please don't take it that way. IMO the market dictates price and people will charge the most people will pay. And IMO the quality will drop on cigars like this to keep them affordable will maximizing profit... |
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Since I started buying them the price has creeped up every year since the bandless edition first came out . And they are still a great cigar . The only special I ever saw with them was the inclusion of a free bundle of Nic 1000 Churchills . Very plain but my Bro in-law loves them 1000's . If you buy a bundle and don't like them I'm sure they would be easy to sell here . :tu
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
There's a lot of old chatter about this brand on the old Club Stogie now Poofda.com or something like that.:rolleyes:
Go back and search for the rumored history of the original 3000's. Interesting stuff and really good cigars. Can't comment on the latest blend if it's the same or not. At the price point they're worth a shot.:2 |
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Quote:
Why is this? Clearly, an altruistic vendor makes no rational sense. No, I feel it is more a free advertising ploy. They get so much free press in the cigar community, it's like free Famous commercials? Hype stick? If you say so. They sure blow Gurkhas and Graycliffs out of the water imho, so I guess it all depends how you define hype stick. :2 |
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Quote:
When the description of a cigar reads: "One of the most talked about cigars on the internet...." that equals hype IMO... I could be wrong... And maybe we describe hype differently, which is fine... I have never seen a Gurkha or Graycliff add say that... |
Re: Famous Nic 3000
I don't think they are hype sticks. They have been producing these for many many years and for a while they were always in stock as the demand wasn't that high. They sell out faster and faster simply because people talk and word spreads about how good of a smoke these are and word gets around. As far as bundled cigars I think these are one of the best and priced fairly well for a bundled cigar unlike some other shops that still charge $6-$7 for what esentially is a house brand/bundled cigar. Yes, the taste will change from year to year slightly. It's to be expected as the taste can change slightly with each crop. You will see this even with high dollar smokes and if you happen to pull a 2 year old stick and compare it with a stick that you bought a few days ago they will taste different. Different crops and one has been aged. These used to be a part of my regular rotation a few years ago but than I moved on to other things. I did recently smoke a newer release and I still think they are a great cheap smoke.
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Et Tu Taboo?;)
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
The original ones were unbanded Olivia Serie X that were dumped after Fuente sued them (thanks Carlos) & they couldn't be sold as Serie X.
They were very nice cigars. I haven't had any of the ones Famous had produced after the first run ran out, so I can't say if they're different or not. |
Re: Famous Nic 3000
I guess I must have misunderstood what you meant by hype stick. I typically think of smokes like the Nub as being hype sticks where they were all people were talking about and everyone thought they were the best thing since sliced bread but yet they hadn't been released yet which made everyone nuts and start calling and seeking them out release day and also on the far end of the spectrum I consider Opus and Anejos albeit great smokes as hype sticks. Everyone wants them, most enjoy them but they can't be had all the time due to limited release dates controlled by the manufacturer(IMHO to create hype) and the retailers that do get them know this so in turn a bunch then double the mark up because they can and because people will still pay it. I honestly don't think the Nic3000s fit into this category. IMHO, its only the serious cigar smokers who typically know about them and seek them out. The average consumer who typically would help the hype machines for smokes like the Nub, LE Tats, Opus etc don't typically know about the small but very enjoyable bundle/house brands.
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Quote:
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Quote:
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Quote:
I've had several of them side by side and thought they were exactly the same cigars. A couple of others who tried them thought the same. When you compared them, you compared the first run 3000s with X that were still available in a few places at the time? The sizes were the same as Olivia had produced for X and they were box pressed, which the X were but which a bundle would typically not. They also came out at the time when Olivia would have been getting rid of them if they didn't plan on just naming them something else. Proof, no. |
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Quote:
I have compared the X series to Original Release 3000's in each vitola. I still have some X series. I have done vertical tastings and they taste very different to me. Maybe it's aging, or different crop from different fields, who knows? But they tasted different to me. Lookwise, they are similar, but a lot of different cigars look the same. |
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Shrug. I just know I like em a lot.
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
as for the ""most talked about on the internet"" review...
Famous was OVERRUN with Internet and phone call orders for the Nic3K What was it caused by? the Internet Cigar Boards. PERIOD. No advertising can compete with word of mouth. |
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Got a 5 pack of the torpedo size about a month ago. Looking forward to trying them in the next coming months. I'm assuming these get better with age, but they can't be all that bad fresh right?
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Quote:
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Nic3K's have been one of my absolute favorite smokes for a long time now. they're consistant, the construction is always top notch, not to mention they taste great!
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
I just bought 20 of these so here's hoping they're great. :D
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Quote:
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
The Toros are on cigarmonster now for $36.98 w/ free shipping. Hurry! They should be on mashup tonight. I'm going to give them a shot.
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Just grabbed a bundle...these are really good with some age on them. :tu :tu
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
Smoked one this weekend with 8 months on it, coming along very nice, definitely a long term investment though. Wonder if the current ones are the same maker/blend as the ones they got in last year around early November.
|
Re: Famous Nic 3000
I know I should have waited, but they came in today and I let one rip. I am def not disappointed. I'll let the rest sit awhile though.
If anyone has tried the Alec Bradley "Supervisor Selection", how do these compare in terms of bang for your buck? |
Quote:
Famous Nic Habanos are tasty, too. Posted via Mobile Device |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:27 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.