Cigar Asylum Cigar Forum - NHL '11

Page 4 of 33

« First

Last »

Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

Cigar Asylum Cigar Forum (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/index.php)

- Sports (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=57)

- - NHL '11 - '12 Thread (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/showthread.php?t=48368)

Ahbroody

10-15-2011 09:04 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by icehog3 (Post 1441816)

Very cool. Wish my fellow Blackhawks fans could be that respectful (or at least courteous) to Chris Chelios.

Heeeeeeeeeelllll no

Bruins Fan

10-15-2011 09:41 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Nice OT win for the B's, Timmy played great:D
Patrick Kane ,that kid can play he's fun to watch :tu

icehog3

10-15-2011 10:46 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Hawks took the 3rd period off. :td

I was bummed McQuaid was out, that guy is a beast.

E.J.	10-15-2011 11:06 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Avs!!!

Jasonw560

10-15-2011 11:09 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Stars on top of the divison. For now.

Bruins Fan

10-16-2011 03:43 AM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

[quote=icehog3;1442186]Hawks took the 3rd period off. :td

Looking at it from our side the Bruins finally woke up and played their game :)

It was a good defensive game just what was expected.

GreekGodX

10-16-2011 06:02 AM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Datsuyk had 2 rare turnovers behind the net that led to both Wild goals. But we came back and won in OT 3-2.

taltos

10-16-2011 11:28 AM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

There is something special for original six games. I wish that we played more, these games only increase the appeal for this great sport. Tom, great game last night. I would have been satisfied but not happy if the B's had lost since the game was so well played.:tu

icehog3

10-16-2011 01:26 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

It sure was fun the 1st two periods, back and forth....love seeing scoring chances right off the breakout. Thomas was stellar in the SO too, Paul.

Hoping Hossa's injury isn't serious, the 2nd line looks totally different (read: worse) with Stalberg on it.

Ahbroody

10-17-2011 10:37 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreekGodX (Post 1442338)

. But we came back and won in OT 3-2.

I didn't see you on the ice. Must have missed your shifts. :r

Sharks didn't learn their lesson from last year looks like they will drop another tonight. Looking at 1-3 start. I know they changed a decent number of pieces, but there are enough vets that this shouldn't be happening.

taltos

10-18-2011 06:59 AM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Tom, when is Kane's contract up? He sure would look great in black and gold!:r:r

E.J.	10-18-2011 07:31 AM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

I just read that this was the Avs first 5-0 road trip ever.... Good stuff.

Like last year, it has been a fun start.... Unfortunately, it is not a sprint, but a marathon.... GO AVS!

icehog3

10-18-2011 10:54 AM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by taltos (Post 1444718)

Tom, when is Kane's contract up? He sure would look great in black and gold!:r:r

Kane is locked up until 2015. He says he prefers red to gold, Paul. ;)

MurphysLaw

10-18-2011 11:01 AM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Missed last night's Panthers game, need to find it online, heard they were pretty impressive and they outscored the other Miami team that played last night :r

icehog3

10-18-2011 11:11 AM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

NHL on XM said the Panthers used a different power play configuration on each power play and confused the living crap out of the Lightning.

357	10-18-2011 11:52 AM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

So when do we start the absurd predictions?

I'm going to go out on a limb :rolleyes: : Red Wings make the playoffs, finish in the top 3 in the West.

GreekGodX

10-18-2011 12:35 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ahbroody (Post 1444289)

You didn't?! I was even smoking a cigar out there :D

icehog3

10-18-2011 05:20 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by 357 (Post 1444970)

So when do we start the absurd predictions?

I'm going to go out on a limb :rolleyes: : Red Wings make the playoffs, finish in the top 3 in the West.

I think the Twins will be the 2011 AL Central Champs.

taltos

10-18-2011 09:01 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by icehog3 (Post 1445346)

I think the Twins will be the 2011 AL Central Champs.

I thought that they were going to win the Superbowl. I am so confused.:r:r

Ahbroody

10-18-2011 10:43 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Nice win by the Rangers over the Nucks. Bieksa is still a huge Bit$h.

icehog3

10-18-2011 11:18 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ahbroody (Post 1445583)

Nice win by the Rangers over the Nucks. Bieksa is still a huge Bit$h.

Along with Burrows and the Finger Biter. ;)

Good overall game by the Hawks tonight over the 'Yotes.

Quite the meltdown by the Bruins, Paul.

taltos

10-19-2011 04:56 AM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Tom, most of the Bruins season has been a nightmare so far. I guess that this is the Cup hangover that everyone talks about.

Bruins Fan

10-19-2011 05:54 AM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

It's not how you start it's how you finish,just got to get into the tournament, but it is frustrating to watch :rolleyes:

icehog3

10-19-2011 08:46 AM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by taltos (Post 1445790)

Tom, most of the Bruins season has been a nightmare so far. I guess that this is the Cup hangover that everyone talks about.

I know it well....Hawks squeaked into the playoffs the next year on the last day of the season. :hn

357	10-19-2011 11:39 AM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreekGodX (Post 1442338)

Datsuyk had 2 rare turnovers behind the net that led to both Wild goals. But we came back and won in OT 3-2.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ahbroody (Post 1444289)

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreekGodX (Post 1445010)

You didn't?! I was even smoking a cigar out there :D

I couldn't help but think of this article I read:

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/...hat-do-mean-we

Quote:

What Do You Mean, 'We?'
The most overused term in sports

We really need to find a better rebounder.

I can't believe we won that game in the bottom of the ninth.

How do you think we're going to do on Sunday?

Here's the deal: If you don't play for, or you are not an employee of, the team in question, "we" is not the pronoun you're looking for.

"They" is the word you want.

...

Because we're talking about sports, there are certain gray areas, of course. I'm a reasonable man. If you're a resident of Green Bay, Wis., you might be able to say "we" when you're talking about the Packers, because you might very well own some small percentage of the team.

If you're a fan of the Toronto Maple Leafs, you can probably say "we," because your faithful devotion to that miserable team is the principal reason they will always be ****. You might as well accept your share of the blame.

College teams present the most interesting dilemma. If you're a student at a university, and you somehow help fund the team through your student fees — I'll freely admit that this might be a purely Canadian, socialist phenomenon — then "we" is appropriate.

But if you've never even attended the school? Then there's no "we" about it.

...

But wait, WAIT, the fans said to me the other night. Sports teams are different from all those other objects of affection. Teams are part of the social fabric of a community. They play in a stadium that we probably paid for. Their name includes the name of my hometown. I'll still love the team long after the current players are gone. How come they can say "we," and I can't? I was here before them, and I'll be here after them. I'm more part of this team than they are.

Tell that to Expos fans or Whalers fans or Browns fans or Grizzlies fans. There wasn't much they could do to change the direction of things, was there? "We" would have meant being able to do something about it. "We" means participant, not observer.

I'm not busting your chops Christos. I've been known to say it too. I just happened accross this article and throught of yours and Mike's recent posts. It's a pretty funny read, although I can't say I entirely agree. I think the author is being a little uptight about it but, it does make for a good laugh.

GreekGodX

10-19-2011 01:34 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

I've boughten enough Little Caesars pizza's over the year that I can speak of the Red Wings with possessive adjectives :)

icehog3

10-19-2011 01:41 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreekGodX (Post 1446281)

I've boughten enough Little Caesars pizza's over the year that I can speak of the Red Wings with possessive adjectives :)

:lr

Pizza Pizza!!

yourchoice

10-20-2011 04:46 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Good Eastern Conference match tonight with the Flyers playing the Capitals. Hope not to miss a shift! :)

E.J.	10-20-2011 07:12 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Avs vs 'Hawks right now... Go Avs!

Bruins Fan

10-20-2011 08:04 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

B's got back on track tonight :D

icehog3

10-20-2011 10:37 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by E.J. (Post 1447865)

Avs vs 'Hawks right now... Go Avs!

Good game for the Hawks Crawford and his D.

I gotta say the Avs are for real, their speed is incredible. They will go as far as Valarmov can take them (maybe a good thing, maybe not).

Should be a great rematch Saturday night. :tu

Sled Dog

10-21-2011 02:49 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Sabres sitting at 5-1, the team is starting to Gel, this could be the year for a deep run (premature, but they look good on paper and ice)

Ahbroody

10-22-2011 06:06 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_F1...e_gdata_player
Man's game, or in the words of Peter Griffin. Road House.

taltos

10-22-2011 06:34 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Sitting here watching the Bruins/Sharks game. I must say that I forgot how fast San Jose is. It is also nice to see Jumbo Joe again-I really miss him.

Ahbroody

10-22-2011 06:57 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by taltos (Post 1450106)

Sitting here watching the Bruins/Sharks game. I must say that I forgot how fast San Jose is. It is also nice to see Jumbo Joe again-I really miss him.

At work, but watching on my phone. Good game so far. A little of everything.

Crap nice meltdown. Two goals in 29 seconds.

Bruins Fan

10-22-2011 07:42 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Slow start to many turnovers. Neimi had a great game.

E.J.	10-22-2011 08:26 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by icehog3 (Post 1448105)

Should be a great rematch Saturday night. :tu

Fun game so far... Go Avs!

E.J.	10-22-2011 08:57 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

2012 Calder = Landeskog

icehog3

10-22-2011 09:49 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by E.J. (Post 1450171)

2012 Calder = Landeskog

He is a helluva player for 18, but he was offside on the tying goal. That's on the linesmen, my buddy Andy McElman.

Good to get 1 point after being down 3-1 with a minute left in the 2nd.

E.J.	10-22-2011 09:55 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by icehog3 (Post 1450201)

He is a helluva player for 18, but he was offside on the tying goal. That's on the linesmen, my buddy Andy McElman.

Good to get 1 point after being down 3-1 with a minute left in the 2nd.

I thought that as well, when it was happening... Never even watched a replay...did that confirm it?

icehog3

10-22-2011 09:59 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

It did, E.J., but it awfully close, I can see how Andy missed it. Regardless, that kid is going to be a star. I just dropped Cam Fowler for him in my fantasy league.

icehog3

10-22-2011 09:59 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

P.S.....Nugent-Hopkins may give him a little competition for the Calder, though. ;)

E.J.	10-22-2011 10:04 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Landeskog is my horse in that race....

Fun start to a season where expectations were low....

icehog3

10-22-2011 10:14 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Avs have been "money" on the road....you should tell them to play all 82 out of Denver. ;)

E.J.	10-22-2011 10:22 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Just getting their legs in Pepsi... They're gonna make a run!

icehog3

10-22-2011 10:23 PM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by E.J. (Post 1450227)

Just getting their legs in Pepsi... They're gonna make a run!

I think they have plenty of talent at forward to do it. Defense, and Varlamov's consistency, will end up telling the tale one way or the other. :2

Bruins Fan

10-28-2011 03:17 AM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Unfreakin believable the Bruins played themselves into last place :sh
Time for a trade,fire a coach do something, I don't see more then a half dozen guys that are untouchable :sl

icehog3

10-28-2011 07:53 AM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Big man trade, John? Chara for John Scott? :D

Bruins Fan

10-28-2011 08:47 AM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Nope,but the way he is playing he wouldn't be missed.
The B's need a puck handler someone that can take a game over and put the puck in the net :D

357	10-28-2011 10:26 AM

Re: NHL '11 - '12 Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruins Fan (Post 1455762)

Unfreakin believable the Bruins played themselves into last place :sh
Time for a trade,fire a coach do something, I don't see more then a half dozen guys that are untouchable :sl

Don't jump just yet. You're very early into the hangover. About 20 games in you'll probably be writing death threats to the GM. By 50 games in the fog might start to clear and if you're lucky they'll make the playoffs.

They likely won't get crazy wanting to blow things up until the offseason. :D

:2

P.S. This is not a slight on the Bs, but a generalization about any cup winning team that hasn't won it in a long time. This funk is what makes being back-to-back champs such an amazing feat.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:36 AM.

Page 4 of 33

« First

Last »

Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page