Cigar Asylum Cigar Forum

Cigar Asylum Cigar Forum (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/index.php)
-   Sports (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=57)
-   -   Lifetime Ban for A-Rod? (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/showthread.php?t=62982)

The Poet 08-05-2013 02:16 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Blueface (Post 1869898)
I am confused. I just don't get the "we need proof" audience.


Guilty, with or without proof? :confused:


OK, sounds fair to me. :D

Starscream 08-05-2013 02:31 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Blueface (Post 1869898)
I am confused. I just don't get the "we need proof" audience.

If an employer (MLB in this case), suspects and feels they have evidence an employee (A-Rod in this case and a bunch of other employees) have been involved in what they deem inappropriate and unacceptable for the work environment and said employer decides to fire some, punish others with suspensions and perhaps even excuse a few, that is wrong how? They have to prove it to who?

Question, where is their player's union? Why aren't they asking for the evidence? Or filing suit? If and when that happens, then and only then will the employer need to show said proof. Until then, they obviously feel they have the goods to support their decision.

My only gripe is how short that suspension list is and I know the reason why as there would otherwise be no players left to play the game. That is the truly sad part.

The MLB isn't the employer, the Yankees are (i'm assuming it still works that way). It would be a different story if the Yankees handed out punishment b/c he's signed with them. If I were a team owner, I would be highly upset if the league tried to ban one of my players without evidence.
I'm probably wrong here though in regards to the business side of the game and how it works nowadays.

Blueface 08-05-2013 02:34 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poet (Post 1869905)
Guilty, with or without proof? :confused:


OK, sounds fair to me. :D

I think I am misunderstood.

Of course I believe there should be proof.
I just don't believe we are the judges of said proof.
I don't believe we are at liberty to know at this time.

As I mentioned earlier, compare it to a criminal or civil case.
Action is taken such as an indictment.
Eventually, accused accepts a plea or is tried. If the latter, then the evidence will be presented. If accepts a plea, the world will never know.
Unfortunately, this is an employer, with contracts and clauses and can act very differently in a manner as they wish.

If A-arod does not challenge it, rest assured the evidence sufficed.
If he challenges, just like the criminal going to trial, then we will eventually know and be able to still debate it all as opinions will always differ on what each of us considers just punishment.

Starscream 08-05-2013 02:37 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Blueface (Post 1869921)
I think I am misunderstood.

Of course I believe there should be proof.
I just don't believe we are the judges of said proof.
I don't believe we are at liberty to know at this time.

As I mentioned earlier, compare it to a criminal or civil case.
Action is taken such as an indictment.
Eventually, accused accepts a plea or is tried. If the latter, then the evidence will be presented. If accepts a plea, the world will never know.
Unfortunately, this is an employer, with contracts and clauses.

If A-arod does not challenge it, rest assured the evidence sufficed.
If he challenges, just like the criminal going to trial, then we will eventually know and be able to still debate it all as opinions will always differ on what each of us considers just punishment.

I agree with that.:tu

Blueface 08-05-2013 02:38 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Starscream (Post 1869919)
The MLB isn't the employer, the Yankees are (i'm assuming it still works that way). It would be a different story if the Yankees handed out punishment b/c he's signed with them. If I were a team owner, I would be highly upset if the league tried to ban one of my players without evidence.
I'm probably wrong here though in regards to the business side of the game and how it works nowadays.

Of course his employer is the Yankees but I see them as Cadillac, where baseball is GM as it relates to control of rules for the league.
Interesting point you raise as we haven't heard a word from the Yankees but I am sure the savings in pay justifies that for them.;)

AdamJoshua 08-05-2013 03:17 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Starscream (Post 1869919)
The MLB isn't the employer, the Yankees are (i'm assuming it still works that way). It would be a different story if the Yankees handed out punishment b/c he's signed with them. If I were a team owner, I would be highly upset if the league tried to ban one of my players without evidence.
I'm probably wrong here though in regards to the business side of the game and how it works nowadays.

You sign a contract that says you will uphold the values set by MLB, I'm sure there is the same for each individual team, but up on top of the ladder is MLB.

Supposedly there are 100s of names in the files, the person that gave the names was pissed off how MLB has handled it and hasn't been cooperating as of late, so they say.

I have a feeling the yankees aren't as ticked off as they are pretending to be, unless it's the fact they wanted him banned for life so they could get out from under his huge contract, same reason he was fighting for a shorter ban.

Oh well he'll hit just as good without playing as he has when he was playing, the problem is they need to bring up / get a full time 3rd baseman for next year, then go back to arod after that, sucks to be them.... haha

Starscream 08-05-2013 08:17 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Blueface (Post 1869924)
Of course his employer is the Yankees but I see them as Cadillac, where baseball is GM as it relates to control of rules for the league.
Interesting point you raise as we haven't heard a word from the Yankees but I am sure the savings in pay justifies that for them.;)

I'd bet the Yankees are hoping for the suspension. It'd save them a ton of money and headache.:)

357 08-06-2013 08:51 AM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poet (Post 1869905)
Guilty, with or without proof? :confused:


OK, sounds fair to me. :D

I think most of those who chose not to appeal, did so to prevent the evidence from being made public. Would you accept 1/3 pay reduction at your job without a fight if your accuser had nothing on you?

yourchoice 08-06-2013 09:47 AM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave128 (Post 1869903)
Also, why does it appear that ARod is the only player that will be granted an appeal?

It's my understanding everyone had the right to appeal, but only ARoid is choosing to do so.

shilala 08-06-2013 10:04 AM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yourchoice (Post 1870232)
It's my understanding everyone had the right to appeal, but only ARoid is choosing to do so.

I don't think that's the case. I forget what the distinction between an appealable offense and one that can't be appealed.
The list I saw had (no appeal) after the first half of the names, and no such thing after the second half of the names.

I wish I wasn't brain dead and could remember the distinction for you, Joel. I read so many stories I can't think of where to look.

Ahh, I got it. The players were suspended for non-analytical positives, meaning they didn't get caught by testing, so they can't appeal. The CBA says they can appeal tests, but not non-analytical offenses.
A few of the guys also failed a test, Colon, Cabrera, and Grandal all had positive tests in the past year, plus they were damned by the Biogenesis records. Being that the test and records overlapped, it'd be double jeopardy if they charged them for failing the test and being caught in the paperwork. So they charged them with the non-analytical evidence and just dropped the positive tests, avoiding appeals.

I'm not exactly sure why Aroid can appeal. Maybe because of the punishment or because it's his second charged violation?
I'll see if I can figure that one out.

357 08-06-2013 10:24 AM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Aroid was punished under a different rule, one about damaging the sport. It's penalty is subject to the commish only if I remember correctly.

shilala 08-06-2013 10:27 AM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 357 (Post 1870245)
Aroid was punished under a different rule, one about damaging the sport. It's penalty is subject to the commish only if I remember correctly.

That'd be it. I know it was something outside the CBA because I heard that, but had no idea what.
Thanks, Mike!!! :tu

Dave128 08-06-2013 11:00 AM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Thanks for clearing that up for me, fellas.

dave 08-06-2013 11:05 AM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shilala (Post 1870240)
Ahh, I got it. The players were suspended for non-analytical positives, meaning they didn't get caught by testing,,,,,

Quite obviously MLB's testing is a useless, abject failure. PED's remain rampant and there's not a damn thing MLB can do unless someone snitches or a doc gets careless.

yourchoice 08-06-2013 12:23 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shilala (Post 1870240)
I don't think that's the case. I forget what the distinction between an appealable offense and one that can't be appealed.
The list I saw had (no appeal) after the first half of the names, and no such thing after the second half of the names.

I wish I wasn't brain dead and could remember the distinction for you, Joel. I read so many stories I can't think of where to look.

Ahh, I got it. The players were suspended for non-analytical positives, meaning they didn't get caught by testing, so they can't appeal. The CBA says they can appeal tests, but not non-analytical offenses.
A few of the guys also failed a test, Colon, Cabrera, and Grandal all had positive tests in the past year, plus they were damned by the Biogenesis records. Being that the test and records overlapped, it'd be double jeopardy if they charged them for failing the test and being caught in the paperwork. So they charged them with the non-analytical evidence and just dropped the positive tests, avoiding appeals.

I'm not exactly sure why Aroid can appeal. Maybe because of the punishment or because it's his second charged violation?
I'll see if I can figure that one out.

Huh...I hadn't heard that before. Not saying it's inaccurate, but ESPN said this in their article here.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ESPN
The 12 other players agreed to deals for their suspensions in which they gave up the right to appeal.

Which I inferred that if they didn't agree to the deals they could have appealed. I don't know for sure though...

gorob23 08-06-2013 12:29 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Starscream (Post 1868676)
I hate A-Rod because he steals signs from second and sells it to the man up,

I would blame the catcher for this not the runner at second for doing his job... now the PED's that a whole different ball game.

Just my .02 I'm done

Rob :tf

billybarue 08-07-2013 10:05 AM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dave (Post 1870262)
Quite obviously MLB's testing is a useless, abject failure. PED's remain rampant and there's not a damn thing MLB can do unless someone snitches or a doc gets careless.

Plenty they can do about it. Weekly MANDATORY random and non-random drug screening. I am subject (Not weekly) to it as an airline pilot and have spent 24 years in the AF/AF Reserves subject to it.

The owners can build monstrous new stadiums, charge $12 for a 16 ounce beer, players make $5 million plus a year, agents and lawyers are raking in the cash, corporations, corporate sponsors (stadiums), and advertising agencies (think about 10 seconds of Super bowl air time) are swimming in money from pro sports, tax revenue base for: stadiums, concessions, parking, etc etc are making politicians powerful and rich too.

In all that money the first priority SHOULD be to keep this game, OUR GAME, clean. There is plenty of money flying around to do that. And therein lies the problem - there's plenty of money flying around and everybody wants their big cut; at the expense of the game. You throw "thirty pieces of silver" on the table and you can get people to do anything - It's human nature.

So I turn my introspection to the fan (Us). ARoid, Bonds, McGuire, all exist not because of their greed and ego (per se), but rather because we continue to fund it. Everybody keeps going to the stadiums and buying the merchandise and worshipping these guys and it will just continue. The purity of the game is gone. But, after 20 years I had to go back and see an MLB game with my 6 year old son. Out in San Diego, great new stadium and location. I don't pay attention anymore. I was just there for the spectacle and the stadium and the show, As well as the desire to take my son to his first game. The players, coaches, managers, and owners are nameless to me. I don't care who is up on that stage or the statistics - it's nothing more than a theatrical production. Good player on third, Chase Headley, I think. He had a good game defensively with a couple of hits. Fun player to watch, but I didn't see him. I just saw the face of Brooks Robinson, my all-time favorite, and I sat back and enjoyed the show and thought about all the great memories of the past. I am going to Wrigley next week (w/ my son) for the first time in my life. Again, just for the show and to see Wrigley - nothing more. We'll talk a lot about guys like Sanberg, Dawson, Santo, and Banks but I don't think I'll even notice who's in the lineup for the day we're there.

I am so jaded on baseball, the game I loved, I can't believe it. "Where have you gone Joe DiMaggio, our nation turns its lonely eyes to you ...."

dave 08-07-2013 10:12 AM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Good words, Billybarue. Closely mirrors my sentiments. I left baseball for good when it deserted me in '94. It still won't look me in the eye and I won't give it the time of day.

Col. Kurtz 08-07-2013 07:14 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dave (Post 1870691)
Good words, Billybarue. Closely mirrors my sentiments. I left baseball for good when it deserted me in '94. It still won't look me in the eye and I won't give it the time of day.

QFT. I was the biggest mets fan in the south growing up. Dykstra, strawberry, et. Al. They lost me in 94. Sealed the deal with Alomar's spit. All have been dirty and dead to me since then. Shame MLB. Shame. The roid record chasers affirmed my indignation. Bonds and Mac made a mockery of the sport from my perspective. Could care less about what I have heard is great AAA ball less than 10 & 20 miles from me. What role models? Who should care?

billybarue 08-09-2013 08:25 AM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Col. Kurtz (Post 1870893)
QFT. I was the biggest mets fan in the south growing up. Dykstra, strawberry, et. Al. They lost me in 94. Sealed the deal with Alomar's spit. All have been dirty and dead to me since then. Shame MLB. Shame. The roid record chasers affirmed my indignation. Bonds and Mac made a mockery of the sport from my perspective. Could care less about what I have heard is great AAA ball less than 10 & 20 miles from me. What role models? Who should care?

I was stationed at Scott AFB (just outside of St Louis) from '96-'99. I didn't know how great a baseball town it is and what the Cardinals have meant to MLB. I was pissed after '94, but i got sucked back in with the Griffey/McGwire home run race of '97. The deception continued into '98 with Sosa. I remember sitting pretty close to the first base line and commenting to a buddy, "cripes, McGwire's got three sets of traps (shoulders)". The dude was a mountain. He was getting "fisted" inside or throwing away from him. Seems if he got a bat to the ball he had the strength to put the ball out to any spot on command. Personally I liked the guy And loved the antics with Sosa, but the worst deceptions are promulgated by those you feel closest to or identify with. Again, it's not your Game Mac - it's OUR GAME!!!

The memory of McGwire at the press conference with tears in his eyes talking about how proud he was that his bat would sit next to Maris' in the HOF, still turns my stomach. IMO opinion McGwire couldn't carry water for Maris. And Mac taking the 5th in front of Congress and Palmiero shaking his finger at the committee. Not your game fellas, they continue to fail to grasp that point. And we continue to fail to remind them of it!

The Poet 08-09-2013 04:03 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Take this with as much salt as you can stomach, but it is a take nonetheless:

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/cuban-m...6476--nba.html

Starscream 08-09-2013 10:11 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poet (Post 1871804)
Take this with as much salt as you can stomach, but it is a take nonetheless:

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/cuban-m...6476--nba.html

Good read. Cuban can be an @$$, but he always speaks his mind.

shilala 08-10-2013 09:44 AM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
I feel much the same way as Cuban does, but when he says it there's not much weight left behind it since he's been snubbed by the MLB twice.
Had Aroid got 100 games like he should, it would all be a non-issue. Selig isn't retarded, he knows that. I'm not sure if he thinks he's sending a message to the fans, the players, or it's just his hurt pride.
It just doesn't make sense to say 211 games and know the whole thing will hang in the air forever. He has to know that fans are sick of the PED drama and that every time it plays out in the media, he looks bad for still not having a handle on it after all these years.

DaBear 08-10-2013 10:23 AM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Not trying to get anyone bent out of shape here, but I question strongly the supposed prior "purity" of the game, and the so called "role models" of old. Many of the biggest names in baseball were known drunkards(Mantle, Ruth, etc) amongst other things, so I question how they could be considered "role models"(not saying anyone here implied this, just making a point as many kids, and parents of kids want themselves/their kids to be the next Babe Ruth). Plus, baseball has a history of cheaters within the game. Mickey Mantle is now known to have corked bats(which his family refutes, but independent experts found true). The MLB has never even taken corking bats seriously, with only six suspensions for it in the last 40 years, with the worst of the suspensions lasting 8 games, and former players coming out and admitting to corking as well.

The Poet 08-10-2013 10:40 AM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DaBear (Post 1872089)
Not trying to get anyone bent out of shape here, but I question strongly the supposed prior "purity" of the game, and the so called "role models" of old. Many of the biggest names in baseball were known drunkards(Mantle, Ruth, etc) amongst other things, so I question how they could be considered "role models"(not saying anyone here implied this, just making a point as many kids, and parents of kids want themselves/their kids to be the next Babe Ruth). Plus, baseball has a history of cheaters within the game. Mickey Mantle is now known to have corked bats(which his family refutes, but independent experts found true). The MLB has never even taken corking bats seriously, with only six suspensions for it in the last 40 years, with the worst of the suspensions lasting 8 games, and former players coming out and admitting to corking as well.

No doubt, and not only "cheating". Ty Cobb was a nasty racist jerk, and Pete Rose was both a jerk and a liar. Sammy Sosa had a corked bat break at the plate, then denied he knew it was corked. And not to jump on Bear's anti-Yankee bandwagon (:D), Billy Martin was a mean drunk as well. We could go on forever, though its relevance to the issue (A-Rod's possibly excessive ban) could be questioned.

DaBear 08-10-2013 10:51 AM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poet (Post 1872094)
No doubt, and not only "cheating". Ty Cobb was a nasty racist jerk, and Pete Rose was both a jerk and a liar. Sammy Sosa had a corked bat break at the plate, then denied he knew it was corked. And not to jump on Bear's anti-Yankee bandwagon (:D), Billy Martin was a mean drunk as well. We could go on forever, though its relevance to the issue (A-Rod's possibly excessive ban) could be questioned.

My bringing this up comes from seeing a couple posts about how baseball has recently lost its purity(or at least thats how I read it). I'm just trying to point out that it ain't really a recent thing that a)players have been cheating and got caught, and b)baseball has lost its "purity."

The Poet 08-10-2013 11:38 AM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DaBear (Post 1872096)
My bringing this up comes from seeing a couple posts about how baseball has recently lost its purity(or at least thats how I read it). I'm just trying to point out that it ain't really a recent thing that a)players have been cheating and got caught, and b)baseball has lost its "purity."

True dat. Ain't nuttin' new under the sun for the boys of summer.

gorob23 08-10-2013 12:43 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by billybarue (Post 1871608)
it's OUR GAME!!! !

I grew up loving baseball. Played it every waking second. Made my friends play over the line, watched the games on TV, listen to "Scully" on the radio, checked the stats. Couldn't do a lick of math homework but could do ANY baseball stat in the world.

But then

The 1981 Major League Baseball strike was the fourth work stoppage in Major League Baseball since the 1972 Major League Baseball strike.[1] The strike began on June 12 and forced the cancellation of 713 games (or 38 percent of the Major League schedule) in the middle of the regular season. The two sides reached an agreement on July 31, and play resumed on August 9 with the All-Star Game, with regular season play resuming one day later.

My buddy and I were older, fed up and printed t - shirts up and started an organization

F.A.N.S. had the word baseball with the international Red Circle through it (copyrighted) and then they settled. I just realized since then I have coached more games at Chavez Ravine than I have gone to watch :r

oh Yea FA.N.S. = Fans Announce New Strike :tu

College ball :)

Rob

The Poet 08-10-2013 12:52 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gorob23 (Post 1872130)
I grew up loving baseball. Played it every waking second. Made my friends play over the line, watched the games on TV, listen to "Scully" on the radio, checked the stats. Couldn't do a lick of math homework but could do ANY baseball stat in the world.

But then

The 1981 Major League Baseball strike was the fourth work stoppage in Major League Baseball since the 1972 Major League Baseball strike.[1] The strike began on June 12 and forced the cancellation of 713 games (or 38 percent of the Major League schedule) in the middle of the regular season. The two sides reached an agreement on July 31, and play resumed on August 9 with the All-Star Game, with regular season play resuming one day later.

My buddy and I were older, fed up and printed t - shirts up and started an organization

F.A.N.S. had the word baseball with the international Red Circle through it (copyrighted) and then they settled. I just realized since then I have coached more games at Chavez Ravine than I have gone to watch :r

oh Yea FA.N.S. = Fans Announce New Strike :tu

College ball :)

Rob

That's all well and good, Rob, but how do you justify this opinion with your signature of "I love the Blackhawks"? The NHL has been MUCH worse in this regard to the fans than baseball ever was!

Not trying to start nuttin' or nuttin', just sayin' I don't see the logic . . . or rather, I do see a logical inconsistency here.

Blueface 08-16-2013 12:34 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Interesting article in today's USA Today.

http://usat.ly/14FHL1F

gorob23 08-16-2013 01:19 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poet (Post 1872132)
That's all well and good, Rob, but how do you justify this opinion with your signature of "I love the Blackhawks"?

Not trying to start nuttin' or nuttin', just sayin' I don't see the logic . . . or rather, I do see a logical inconsistency here.

Sir Poet,
If a man dwells on the past, then he robs the present. But if a man ignores the past, he may rob the future. The seeds of our destiny are nurtured by the roots of our past.

Rob :tf

Blueface 08-18-2013 12:19 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
As The World Turns, General Hospital, heck, even Dark Shadows don't come close to this soap opera.

http://www.sportingnews.com/mlb/stor...cid=mobileapp1

pnoon 08-18-2013 06:49 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Ryan Dempster's a low-life thug and should have been tossed.
I'm no fan of A-Rod but Dempster's and the Red Sox are classless.

Blueface 08-19-2013 12:10 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Helps explain why w know little about the evidence but seems like a good offer by MLB calling attorneys bluff.
http://usat.ly/161cIh4

The Poet 08-19-2013 01:03 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gorob23 (Post 1874350)
Sir Poet,
If a man dwells on the past, then he robs the present. But if a man ignores the past, he may rob the future. The seeds of our destiny are nurtured by the roots of our past.

Rob :tf


:confused:

OK, whatever, but what about the answer to my question? :r

icehog3 08-19-2013 06:22 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
What's NOT to love about the Blackhawks?!

kelmac07 08-19-2013 06:28 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by icehog3 (Post 1875214)
What's NOT to love about the Blackhawks?!

Sure as hell beats hearing about A-Roid every ten minutes.

icehog3 08-19-2013 06:30 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kelmac07 (Post 1875217)
Sure as hell beats hearing about A-Roid every ten minutes.

:lr :tu

Starscream 08-24-2013 09:09 AM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kelmac07 (Post 1875217)
Sure as hell beats hearing about A-Roid every ten minutes.

:tu

The Poet 08-24-2013 10:22 AM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kelmac07 (Post 1875217)
Sure as hell beats hearing about A-Roid every ten minutes.

I hear ya, Mac.


Still, that begs the question: If one is tired of hearing about this, one should maybe consider stop talking about it first. :D

Just :2 , and worth every penny.

kelmac07 08-24-2013 12:13 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
I hear ya Thomas, but every time I turn on ESPN or MLB Network...it's something about him and what he's done/or won't do. :bh :bh

He (any many others included) have turned the game I love into a carnival.

The Poet 08-24-2013 12:26 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Hey, think about ME for a second, who lives about a howitzer shot from The Bronx! :r

I also live a pistol shot from the Jets training facility, and had to deal with Tebowmania LAST year. :D

kelmac07 08-24-2013 12:32 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
I feel your pain brother. :D

The Poet 08-24-2013 12:40 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kelmac07 (Post 1876775)
I feel your pain brother. :D


No biggie, brother. I haven't liked A-Rod since he dissed his "buddy" Jeter in SI 'way back when. And I haven't liked the Jets since Namath put on pantyhose and a fur coat. :r

gorob23 08-24-2013 12:56 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poet (Post 1876777)
Namath put on pantyhose and a fur coat. :r

:r I remember that, that's about the time I figured out I kinda liked him .. Go Figure ;s

Rob :tu

The Poet 08-24-2013 01:41 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gorob23 (Post 1876779)
:r I remember that, that's about the time I figured out I kinda liked him .. Go Figure ;s

Rob :tu


Hey, different strokes for different folks, Rob.


Not that there's anything WRONG with that. ;)

gorob23 09-01-2013 12:36 PM

Re: Lifetime Ban for A-Rod?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poet (Post 1876784)
Hey, different strokes for different folks, Rob.


Not that there's anything WRONG with that. ;)



"The man who has confidence in himself gains the confidence of others".
Hasidic Saying

Rob ;)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.