![]() |
Re: Padron Question
Thanks. Someone said they spoke to Jorge and he said they were all the same blend. I have been wondering if this was true. Would have been nice if some aged 000's would taste like a 1926...
|
Re: Padron Question
Try the 1964 PAN's & PAM's, and the Serie 1926 (Mad or Nat)...they're really great cigars...
|
Re: Padron Question
Series 1926 Nat- My Favorite Cigar Of All Time!:dr:tu
|
Re: Padron Question
I like the 3000 and 6000 a lot. Do not try the 1964 or 1926 lines though :D
|
Re: Padron Question
another nod to the Londres, here! I also like the 2000 a lot. But my understanding is that they are all the same blend, just different sizes with the x000 series being given more ascetically-pleasing wrappers.
I personally think all of the regular (i.e. non Anny) Padrons need a decent amount of humidor time before they are at their best, to my tastes at least. But those Mexican-grown wrappers are mighty tasty! |
Re: Padron Question
Another vote for the Londres. Don't let the smaller ring guage fool you, they pack in the flavor!!
|
Re: Padron Question
Quote:
From my understanding it is a Nicaraguan puro. |
Re: Padron Question
Quote:
The Padrons don't advertise this because there are so many people that prefer the term "puro" to be attached to the cigars, but they've been growing their wrapper in Mexico for years and I'd guess they'd tell you if you asked (the family, not some company mook). |
Re: Padron Question
who else could be a source of info as the padron has no reps, only family?
|
Re: Padron Question
Quote:
|
Re: Padron Question
Quote:
FWIW I have no stake in this discussion,purely repeating what I was told. |
Re: Padron Question
Quote:
I've no idea if there's any merit to the statement or not. |
Re: Padron Question
Well, I've looked everywhere to try to find the answer, and it remains a mystery. I had just assumed it was a Nicaraguan puro...
I am going to e-mail the company and see if we can get a definitive answer. |
Re: Padron Question
I was told this info by another cigar maker (not a rep) who I'd rather not name because I'm sure he wouldn't want to publically say anything that could be taken as a knock no Padron ... but you would all know the name of the cigar maker I'm talking about.
Anyway, he said that he's toured the Padron's facilities, knows the family, and enjoys the product himself ... the only trouble he has with them is that (in his opinion), they are less than fully honest by letting people believe their tobacco is all grown in Nica when in fact the wrappers are grown in Mexico. Again--I have nothing against Mexican tobacco. Pepin's new Murcielago (EO Brand) uses a Mexican binder and wrapper, and I'm told it's an awesome cigar (have not smoked one). And I don't care where the grow the wrappers for the Padrons, as I love Padrons. If I learned they encourage cockroaches to crawl all over the PAN wrapper leaf, it would not change the fact that I love that cigar. |
Re: Padron Question
Quote:
|
Re: Padron Question
All this talk of Mexican tobacco made me go to the local taqueria for tacos de chorizo con todo and Pacifico. :dr:dr
Oh, now I'm smoking a nappy looking natural Padron Delicia. Seriously, this thing looks like a piece of re-bar. Yum! Viva Mexico! |
Re: Padron Question
Padron 2000, Londres, Exclusivo and Imperial '64, and No. 2 and No. 6 '26 are my favorites!!!
|
Re: Padron Question
After reading all of this I sent an email to Jeff Padron; here is the response I received from him:
Quote:
|
Re: Padron Question
Very interesting. Nice work.
|
Re: Padron Question
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.