Originally Posted by uptown_isy (Post 229525)

I feel bad for the sucker who was actually willing to pay for her.

Originally Posted by Ahbroody (Post 229547)

Hmmmmmmm where was BamBam during this incident.
He lives in Ohio wonder if he now has a record. Come to think of it he kind of looks like that chick if he was wearing a wig. Well if we dont here from him for a few days guess we know what happened.

Originally Posted by taltos (Post 229822)

Someone has to service the Ohio State crowd. Come to think of it, didn't she play right tackle last year?:ss

Originally Posted by pnoon (Post 229752)

Sure. She can also be running guns to Nicaragua or selling heroin on the street corner. As long as the paths don't cross, it's all good. :rolleyes:

Originally Posted by Darrell (Post 229819)

I bet she has a great personality. :ss

Originally Posted by Drazzil (Post 229743)

I honestly do not see a problem with it. Using classroom computers to set up liasons would be a huge no-no and might even be grounds for disclipinary actions, but as long as the two careers the teacher worked never crossed paths, I dont see what the huge issue here is.

Originally Posted by pnoon (Post 229752)

Sure. She can also be running guns to Nicaragua or selling heroin on the street corner. As long as the paths don't cross, it's all good. :rolleyes:

Originally Posted by morefifemusic (Post 229840)

It would be in most unions contracts. Falls under a similar line of using the school computer for any illegal activity.



While Peter's response sounds tongue and cheek, the fine line between what is appropriate and isnt for a teacher is a good point.

I am not allowed to smoke pipe at school (obviously), but if I am around town smoking and one of my students see me, is that grounds for discipline? I don't think so (and I think the district would have a real hard time doing anything like that). However, if I am busted on my own time for meth use or something like that, it is a different story.

Item four of the NEA (National Education Association, one of the two main national organizations for teachers_ Code of Professional Ethics states:

[The teacher...] Shall make reasonable effort to protect the student from conditions harmful to learning or to health and safety.

Being a methamphetamine addict would likely pose a risk to health and safety. Engaging in prostitution could be argued to as well.

In particular, I work at a day treatment with students with severe behavior disorders. Many of the students have also been sexually abused or perpetrated sexual offenses themselves. Having a prostitute teaching them would probably not be the best idea. :hm

Anyway, interesting story. I am particularly curious if this was her first time. The new article says her record was clean till now.

Originally Posted by morefifemusic (Post 229840)

It would be in most unions contracts. Falls under a similar line of using the school computer for any illegal activity.



While Peter's response sounds tongue and cheek, the fine line between what is appropriate and isnt for a teacher is a good point.

I am not allowed to smoke pipe at school (obviously)

Originally Posted by Drazzil (Post 229743)

I honestly do not see a problem with it. Using classroom computers to set up liasons would be a huge no-no and might even be grounds for disclipinary actions, but as long as the two careers the teacher worked never crossed paths, I dont see what the huge issue here is.

Originally Posted by floydpink (Post 230082)

Not sure about Ohio, but where I live, they plaster your pic on the internet if you get caught with a prostitute.

That would suck.

Originally Posted by floydpink (Post 230082)

Not sure about Ohio, but where I live, they plaster your pic on the internet if you get caught with a prostitute.